Jump to content

S4GRU

Administrator
  • Posts

    33,136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1,212

Everything posted by S4GRU

  1. Nope. I had no idea. Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  2. WiMax deployment is completely different. WiMax was on Clearwire sites. LTE is on Sprint Network Vision sites. There is no correlation. Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  3. The panels are different and there are less of them on each sector. But I do not see any RRU's. But approx. 5% of sites will not get RRU's if the structure cannot support them. I'm not sure what to make of this. Thanks for the photos. Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  4. The FCC may require Sprint match coverage for their rural customers as part of the deal. Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk
  5. http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2120-listing-of-legacy-vendorsnetwork-vision-vendors-by-market/ Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk
  6. I misread your post. I thought you were inquiring about why two different sites are performing differently. Each site has two or three sectors. Each sector can perform differently. If one sector works well and another sector from the same site does not (with similar signal strength), then that is usually a capacity issue. The slow sector is over capacity. Too many users. It is possible that you could be experiencing interference. But if speeds are slow over that whole sector, then it is likely not interference. Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk
  7. Nice, France Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  8. You will get your wish this week. Stay tuned. Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk
  9. Ericsson markets are way behind in 3G upgrades at Network Vision sites. Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk
  10. The capacity of two 5x5's is the same as one 10x10. Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  11. The network needs to be upgraded. That's what Network Vision does. Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  12. Sprint is not getting the USCC network. Just subscribers and spectrum. Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  13. They are working on it. We should see the first Jacksonville site in this week's update. But the market will not launch this month. It is behind schedule. Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  14. AJ has agreed to work on this story for the wall. Timing of the story still up in the air. Could be this afternoon or tomorrow. Stay tuned. Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  15. Nope. Backhaul is the connection between a cell site and the Sprint network (MSC switching center or 4G network core). eHRPD is a 3G technology that is identical to EVDO, except that instead of your data going from the cell site through the internet to a legacy MSC, it instead goes to the 4G core. This allows your device to maintain one IP address as you transition from LTE to 3G. And you have a seamless experience. Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  16. LTE Advanced is a minor software upgrade. Sprint will be deploying it over its entire network too. But LTE Advanced in and of itself does not produce faster results. It's the additional hardware support of LTE Advanced that produces improvements. Things like wider channel support, carrier aggregation, additional MIMO antenna support, etc. However, if a Wireless carrier doesn't upgrade hardware to take advantage of LTE Advanced, and have devices that do, then LTE Advanced is just a label. So a lot of carriers will be singing the chorus of LTE Advanced, but it won't mean anything. Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  17. The round table format ate hairy spiders when drunk. Its towers became bloated after swallowing a mouthful of baby formula. The baby ate his poisoned barbeque chicken ribs without A1 steak sauce. Fix the chair leg before somebody trips and breaks their sister's glass. It peed shards of LTE droppings from bubbly fermented apples. Doctors gouge the helpless when options appear dangerously silly for perpendicular slicing. Around Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  18. ship shape Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  19. Every minor shareholder is at risk for what the major shareholders do. That's how investing works. In all of my investments, I am a minor shareholder. I am impacted by major shareholder decisions all the time. This is rediculous. But they all benefit from Sprint's investments in Clearwire, Sprint's customer status in Clearwire, Sprint making debt payments for Clearwire and they profit off of Sprint taking over Clearwire. Sprint has saved Clearwire from bankruptcy several times. And now Sprint will likely over pay shareholders for Clearwire. These are some greedy wrong minded SOB's. Many investors planned on Clearwire to fail and then profit off the asset sales. I guess they targeted Clearwire spectrum to be worth more than it is. A spectrum sale would be worth much less than what Sprint/SoftBank will pay. Idiots. Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  20. I never said any such thing. I don't discuss politics publicly. I work in government, that never gets you far. For all you know, I could have had a nightmare. Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  21. Emojis? What's that? Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
  22. Sprint is buying out a portion of USCC... LTE must be coming Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner
×
×
  • Create New...