Jump to content

Verizon offers to Buy Clearwire Spectrum Leases


marioc21

Recommended Posts

Just breaking from WSJ twitter feed:

 

Verizon is offering to buy $1.5 billion in spectrum leases from Clearwire.

 

Still looking for a full article. Will update when I find one.

 

 

 

Wall Street Journal @WSJ

 

Breaking: Verizon Wireless has offered to pay up to $1.5 billion to buy spectrum leases from Clearwire.http://wsj.com

 

https://twitter.com/WSJ

 

The Sprint related wireless news is sizzling today.

 

Update: Here's the WSJ Story. It's behind the paywall but search for the article title in google and it should get you through the paywall.

 

 

Verizon Wireless Pursuing Clearwire Spectrum

 

Verizon Wireless has offered to pay up to $1.5 billion to buy spectrum leases from Clearwire Corp., people familiar with the matter said.

...

Clearwire disclosed the offer in a securities filing Friday, but only identified the bidder as "Party J." People familiar with the matter confirmed it was Verizon. The price would be reduced by the present value of what Clearwire pays to lease the spectrum, an amount that could be substantial, the company said in the filing.

It's unclear whether Verizon, which is a joint venture of Verizon Communications Inc. and Vodafone Group PLC, has any ambitions with Clearwire beyond the spectrum purchase or how it might fit in with Sprint's agreement to buy the roughly 50% of Clearwire it doesn't already own. Clearwire said in the filing that it would evaluate the proposal and discuss it with "Party J" and Sprint.

...

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324345804578424514105025922.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, after the massive SpectrumCo-Cox AWS acquisition, another huge VZW spectrum purchase is perfectly reasonable. Not! That transaction would not stand a snowball's chance in hell of approval.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I interpret this as verizon trying to ensure that sprints bid for clear is deemed "undervalued" and nothing more. It is a play to keep sprint from holding too many advantageous spectrum cards

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, after the massive SpectrumCo-Cox AWS acquisition, another huge VZW spectrum purchase is perfectly reasonable. Not! That transaction would not stand a snowball's chance in hell of approval.

 

AJ

 

If it's just lease spectrum I fully support it and it would be good for Sprint/Clearwire/Dish/Softbank. Sprint on its own does not have the market clout to get 2500 built into phones affordably if they are the only carrier using that spectrum in the US. Look at what Sprint had to do to get the Iphone, will Apple build 2500 into a phone for Sprint without significant concessions again?

 

And considering the New Sprint spectrum holding divesting some leased spectrum might not be a bad thing in the FCC eyes.

 

*With ATT having WCS would the FCC really block a lease transfer? Especially given that with a Max lease of 15 years the carriers will all get a fair shot at it again in the future?

 

 

*Edit, transfer subject to reasonable buildout requirements of course*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, after the massive SpectrumCo-Cox AWS acquisition, another huge VZW spectrum purchase is perfectly reasonable. Not! That transaction would not stand a snowball's chance in hell of approval.

 

AJ

 

This is above the spectrum screen - why would it not be approved? Frankly, more than one company should offer 2.6 service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 503ducati

'No Slam Dunk'

 

http://blogs.wsj.com...s-no-slam-dunk/

 

Dish has made a stunning bid to buy Sprint S +13.18% for a cash-and -stock deal valuing Dish at $25.5 billion. Last year Softbank agreed to buy Sprint, also for a package of cash and stock. Dish claims its offer is worth 13% more.

 

. . .

 

Send questions, comments or story ideas to Dealpolitik@gmail.com.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is above the spectrum screen - why would it not be approved? Frankly, more than one company should offer 2.6 service.

 

I am with you. I have said it before and I will say it now. Unless Sprint plans to make money from OTT video (i.e. an extra $10-20/month for OTT video), they should just take the BRS spectrum out of Cleariwire and then try to get some money out of Clearwire by selling the network + spectrum to Dish or spectrum to Verizon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am with you. I have said it before and I will say it now. Unless Sprint plans to make money from OTT video (i.e. an extra $10-20/month for OTT video), they should just take the BRS spectrum out of Cleariwire and then try to get some money out of Clearwire by selling the network + spectrum to Dish or spectrum to Verizon.

 

Well, I think sprint using it for how they've explained (urban areas for additional capacity) is fine. I think the entire ecosystem is better off if there are more providers that offer 2.6GHz service. At 160MHz, there is enough to go around to benefit the ecosystem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a BRS/EBS graphic that I have embellished and posted numerous times. Band 7 (FDD) is nigh impossible. Band 41 (TDD) is the only feasible option.

 

A93ArgECIAAh-0h.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is above the spectrum screen - why would it not be approved? Frankly, more than one company should offer 2.6 service.

I would be extremely surprised if VZ planned to actually utilized that spectrum.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be extremely surprised if VZ planned to actually utilized that spectrum.

 

I think they would have places where they could use it. Het nets, small cells, DAS systems, super crowded places. They have 2x10 AWS they can still deploy in most places.

 

That said, I still think VZW is making a play for EBS for two reasons.

 

1. They are up against the spectrum cap.

2. They want to inflict their own "Operation Chaos" on the Sprint/Dish/Clear fiasco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2. They want to inflict their own "Operation Chaos" on the Sprint/Dish/Clear fiasco.

 

Apparently, VZW is being advised by Leopold Stotch of Sanford Bernstein...

 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with Verizon or Dish or AT&T buying a slice of that spectrum. Unless Sprint/Clearwire become OTT video providers and/or fixed broadband ISPs, they will have no use for that spectrum for strictly mobile needs. I would not mind at all if there was a three way split of the spectrum. VZ and Dish split the EBS spectrum and Sprint/Clearwire get the BRS spectrum. Dish also gets the Clearwire infrastructure. Sprint/Clearwire gets some money out of it to wipe out some of Clearwire's debt and the spectrum gets utilized. Then Sprint turns around and merges with T-Mobile/MetroPCS. Sprint is happy, VZ is happy, Dish is somewhat happy, the feds are happy that we have 4 carriers again, and most importantly, I am happy because we have 3 strong competitors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint merging with T-Mobile / MetroPCS is a non-starter. They have too much M/A activity that it's completely impractical right now, and downt he road once the CLWR / SoftBank / Dish dust settles, I don't think it would make much sense anyway.

 

Besides, didn't the Nextel deal teach us anything about completely incompatible networks and frequencies? T-Mo and MPCS have 1900, but they've got a lot of other baggage too that complicates. You can't play in every spectrum pool, you've got to settle on a few and Sprint seems to have settled on 800/1900/2.5/2.6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint merging with T-Mobile / MetroPCS is a non-starter. They have too much M/A activity that it's completely impractical right now, and downt he road once the CLWR / SoftBank / Dish dust settles, I don't think it would make much sense anyway.

 

Besides, didn't the Nextel deal teach us anything about completely incompatible networks and frequencies? T-Mo and MPCS have 1900, but they've got a lot of other baggage too that complicates. You can't play in every spectrum pool, you've got to settle on a few and Sprint seems to have settled on 800/1900/2.5/2.6

 

I don't know...AT&T and Verizon seem pretty close to playing with every spectrum pool (700/850/AWS/PCS). AT&T goes even further with investing in WCS spectrum as well. I agree that Sprint needs to settle on a few bands but I feel Sprint should support bands that everyone else is also using for economies of scale. I wouldn't object if Sprint decided to add AWS band spectrum support at some point in the future whether that is through obtaining some AWS spectrum (ex: Cricket purchase) or if LTE roaming becomes available. The other 3 major carriers are planning to deploy LTE on AWS spectrum and there will be an upcoming AWS spectrum auction perhaps in 2014 to expand the AWS band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other 3 major carriers are planning to deploy LTE on AWS spectrum and there will be an upcoming AWS spectrum auction perhaps in 2014 to expand the AWS band.

 

Yes and no. AT&T is doing some token AWS LTE deployment right now, but that is only until AT&T further consolidates its Lower 700 MHz spectrum holdings and gets LTE up and running on Cellular, PCS, and WCS. Then, expect AT&T to bow out of AWS, selling off what little remains to VZW and/or T-Mobile.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint merging with T-Mobile / MetroPCS is a non-starter. They have too much M/A activity that it's completely impractical right now, and downt he road once the CLWR / SoftBank / Dish dust settles, I don't think it would make much sense anyway.

 

Besides, didn't the Nextel deal teach us anything about completely incompatible networks and frequencies? T-Mo and MPCS have 1900, but they've got a lot of other baggage too that complicates. You can't play in every spectrum pool, you've got to settle on a few and Sprint seems to have settled on 800/1900/2.5/2.6

 

Of course after the dust settles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...