Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Missouri Market (includes St. Louis)


riddlebox

Recommended Posts

McDonnell's Market Place

 

Mapped interstate

 

vurumyma.jpg

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

How's that G2 treatin ya?  My dad just switched back to our sprint account and got the G2 today (his work phone was through AT&T but they are cancelling that plan).  I played with the G2 for about 20 mins and was pretty impressed.  My One doesn't seem so special anymore, lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How's that G2 treatin ya?  My dad just switched back to our sprint account and got the G2 today (his work phone was through AT&T but they are cancelling that plan).  I played with the G2 for about 20 mins and was pretty impressed.  My One doesn't seem so special anymore, lol

 

I honestly have no complaints with the phone. The battery life is amazing. If your dad isn't going to be a heavy user of the phone he should get a full day of usage without charging.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like LTE speed has been steadily degrading. I guess it's not entirely surprising as more LTE phones are activated.

 

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

in some areas I agree others are speeding up. I hit 23 meg out near research park.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like LTE speed has been steadily degrading. I guess it's not entirely surprising as more LTE phones are activated.

 

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Where exactly were you when this was taken? It may be worth opening a trouble ticket if it's in an area that should have good coverage.

 

I will also need to see your engineering screen, or a signal check pro screen shot.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many sites are remaining in the STL Market? I would think that 1900 would get wrapped up by Spring, making room for the 800 rollout, right?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many sites are remaining in the STL Market? I would think that 1900 would get wrapped up by Spring, making room for the 800 rollout, right?

 

 

1900 LTE and 800 LTE updates will likely run side by side for several months. There's still more than 100 sites that are completely Legacy (as far as we know) in the Missouri market. It will likely take the better part of 6 months to get those 100 sites completed, as they are likely the hardest sites to get to. Either permitting is difficult, or the engineering is difficult, or some combination thereof. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man that LTE site on Campus near Zumbehl/70 is so bad I give up even using Tapatalk there.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

Are you saying that you're having difficulty with the LTE on it? I always pulled fairly good speeds from it on my One, although I am convinced something is weird with its downtilt or panel mounting as its coverage does not reach very far. You can see the side profile of the panels and they are aimed pretty low.

 

I switched to my new Nexus 5 on Tuesday of this week, though, and it will not connect to LTE on that site. And just like when this site was running legacy, EVDO is completely unusable on the two sectors facing the highway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you saying that you're having difficulty with the LTE on it? I always pulled fairly good speeds from it on my One, although I am convinced something is weird with its downtilt or panel mounting as its coverage does not reach very far. You can see the side profile of the panels and they are aimed pretty low.

 

I switched to my new Nexus 5 on Tuesday of this week, though, and it will not connect to LTE on that site. And just like when this site was running legacy, EVDO is completely unusable on the two sectors facing the highway.

I get .1 Mbps  some times even .01 Mbps on LTE when near there. Been that way for a couple weeks or more. I am still on my Note 2 and its by far the slowest I have seen when on LTE. When its the worst Tapatalk has problems connecting while I sit there munching on goodies from one of the fast food joints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you saying that you're having difficulty with the LTE on it? I always pulled fairly good speeds from it on my One, although I am convinced something is weird with its downtilt or panel mounting as its coverage does not reach very far. You can see the side profile of the panels and they are aimed pretty low.

 

I switched to my new Nexus 5 on Tuesday of this week, though, and it will not connect to LTE on that site. And just like when this site was running legacy, EVDO is completely unusable on the two sectors facing the highway.

 

 

I get .1 Mbps  some times even .01 Mbps on LTE when near there. Been that way for a couple weeks or more. I am still on my Note 2 and its by far the slowest I have seen when on LTE. When its the worst Tapatalk has problems connecting while I sit there munching on goodies from one of the fast food joints.

 

 

Which site is this? It's possible that it's already experiencing capacity issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which site is this? It's possible that it's already experiencing capacity issues.

W Clay & Campus St. Charles, MO Edited by Dkoellerwx
site ID
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...