Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Missouri Market (includes St. Louis)


riddlebox

Recommended Posts

I couldn't see any evidence of recently-disturbed ground, though.  Do they run fiber to every single site, I guess?

 

There has to be existing backhaul of some type there, whether fiber, microwave, or copper wire, if there is existing copper then there is existing conduit, and all they have to do pull new fiber in the existing conduit.  We do it all the time in traffic signal design, we replace existing 7-wire or twisted pair interconnect with fiber using the existing conduits.  They should be able to put the fiber lines in the conduit and keep the existing copper in place to keep the legacy equipment up and running. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed as I was driving home on 70 this evening, that it looked like the tower at 70 & Bercher looked like it had RRUs up on the rack.  My phone never showed 4G however.  I will try to get a look at that tower tomorrow on my way home again, unless anyone can beat me to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed as I was driving home on 70 this evening, that it looked like the tower at 70 & Bercher looked like it had RRUs up on the rack.  My phone never showed 4G however.  I will try to get a look at that tower tomorrow on my way home again, unless anyone can beat me to it.

Top or bottom rack?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was the bottom rack, but I'm not positive.  Just happened to see it while driving past on 70. 

Just looked at the street view of that site. Bottom rack is most likely sprint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nowhere even remotely close. 10 miles apart.

 

Looks about the same distance as the columbia/255 blips from telegraph.

 

But hey, I hope it's a new tower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks about the same distance as the columbia/255 blips from telegraph.

 

But hey, I hope it's a new tower.

Just got 4G on Main St in Alton. I will try to check it out during Lunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

speaking of distance, I know if varies depending on frequency, terrain & line of site but does anyone know the rough distance to expect for a Sprint cell site?

It all depends on the site. Could be 1 mile. Could be 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

speaking of distance, I know if varies depending on frequency, terrain & line of site but does anyone know the rough distance to expect for a Sprint cell site?

 

2 blocks to 10 miles. There really is no such thing as a typical rough distance. For the reasons you cite, and more. What height are the antennas mounted? What is the downtilt of the panels? Where is the device in relation to the panels? Are there RF shadows caused by large buildings, hills or mountains?

 

Every cell is specifically designed to cover an area. Very few cells are full sized at 5-10 miles. Most are engineered to be much smaller to provide a better signal and capacity in denser areas.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 blocks to 10 miles. There really is no such thing as a typical rough distance. For the reasons you cite, and more. What height are the antennas mounted? What is the downtilt of the panels? Where is the device in relation to the panels? Are there RF shadows caused by large buildings, hills or mountains?

 

Every cell is specifically designed to cover an area. Very few cells are full sized at 5-10 miles. Most are engineered to be much smaller to provide a better signal and capacity in denser areas.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

That said, could the extremely high and rising floodwaters in the Mississippi and Missouri rivers make the signal travel further?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That said, could the extremely high and rising floodwaters in the Mississippi and Missouri rivers make the signal travel further?

 

That's a good little stretch there...  fog will affect it more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 blocks to 10 miles. There really is no such thing as a typical rough distance. For the reasons you cite, and more. What height are the antennas mounted? What is the downtilt of the panels? Where is the device in relation to the panels? Are there RF shadows caused by large buildings, hills or mountains?

 

Every cell is specifically designed to cover an area. Very few cells are full sized at 5-10 miles. Most are engineered to be much smaller to provide a better signal and capacity in denser areas.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

The tower I get a signal off of in St Peters has a weak signal. I don't get a signal at all in my basement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

2 blocks to 10 miles. There really is no such thing as a typical rough distance. For the reasons you cite, and more. What height are the antennas mounted? What is the downtilt of the panels? Where is the device in relation to the panels? Are there RF shadows caused by large buildings, hills or mountains?

 

 

Every cell is specifically designed to cover an area. Very few cells are full sized at 5-10 miles. Most are engineered to be much smaller to provide a better signal and capacity in denser areas.

 

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

The tower I get a signal off of in St Peters has a weak signal. I don't get a signal at all in my basement.

4G?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The connection I got in Alton this morning is definitely fringe connecton from 270 and Riverview...went down there again signal was between -108 and -120 and Serving cell stayed on 138... mapped a couple points....I know I'm not supposed to with my GNex but I just had to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're price for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...