Jump to content

PRL 60687

CuriousTim
 Share

Recommended Posts

gopher_otis Member Level: 1x Advanced

gopher_otis

Posted
Posted
Just checked my iPhone for an update and it went from 51086 to 51087.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner

 

Try typing ##873283# into the dial pad then hit the call button. Wait a minute or so and your PRL should be updated. Mine is at 60687.

 

 Sent via Forum Runner on my redsn0w iOS 5.1 iPhone 4 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
themuffinman Member Level: LTE Advanced

themuffinman

Posted
Posted

Got the update too but I am unsure. I wish someone would pull the prl from the Nexus to see if it has roaming with Metro PCS LTE

 

Uhhh, no roaming with metro pcs lte or anyone else's lte for that matter.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
djmiro83 Member Level: 1x Advanced

djmiro83

Posted
Posted

 

Try typing ##873283# into the dial pad then hit the call button. Wait a minute or so and your PRL should be updated. Mine is at 60687.

 

 Sent via Forum Runner on my redsn0w iOS 5.1 iPhone 4 

 

That's odd mine didn't update to 60687. Perhaps it's because I'm still on 5.0.1? (can't update or I lose my JB)

 

Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gopher_otis Member Level: 1x Advanced

gopher_otis

Posted
Posted
That's odd mine didn't update to 60687. Perhaps it's because I'm still on 5.0.1? (can't update or I lose my JB)
That's probably it. I don't think we're going to have to wait much longer for 5.1 to be untethered though.

 

 Sent via Forum Runner on my redsn0w iOS 5.1 iPhone 4 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
Posted

That's probably it. I don't think we're going to have to wait much longer for 5.1 to be untethered though.

 

 Sent via Forum Runner on my redsn0w iOS 5.1 iPhone 4 

 

Hopefully not. I have 2 iPhone's to update to 5.1 for others, but just waiting for the untether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
djmiro83 Member Level: 1x Advanced

djmiro83

Posted
Posted

 

Hopefully not. I have 2 iPhone's to update to 5.1 for others' date=' but just waiting for the untether.[/quote']

 

Odds are it's taking a while because there technically is an untethered 5.1 JB out there, however I'm thinking their exploit can't be made public since it required an apple dev account. Same thing happened with the 5.0.1 4S JB. We'll get it in due time.

 

Sent from my JB iPhone 4S using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
Posted

 

Odds are it's taking a while because there technically is an untethered 5.1 JB out there' date=' however I'm thinking their exploit can't be made public since it required an apple dev account. Same thing happened with the 5.0.1 4S JB. We'll get it in due time.

 

Sent from my JB iPhone 4S using Forum Runner[/quote']

 

My old 3Gs is the best for jailbreaks. Limerain has made it untethered for life. :)

 

Sent from Joshs iPhone 3Gs using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wolvan Member Level: Digital

Wolvan

Posted
Posted

I updated both my Epic 4G and my wife's Epic 4G Touch after seeing this post. Big help for us in the signal department. We live in the south Chicago area where they have been struggling with the NV rollout and our coverage has been horrible the last few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gopher_otis Member Level: 1x Advanced

gopher_otis

Posted
Posted
My old 3Gs is the best for jailbreaks. Limerain has made it untethered for life. :)
It's because the 3GS has a certain boot rom that makes every jailbreak untethered.

 

I updated both my Epic 4G and my wife's Epic 4G Touch after seeing this post. Big help for us in the signal department. We live in the south Chicago area where they have been struggling with the NV rollout and our coverage has been horrible the last few weeks.
It's still meh for me even with the update. Glad it's gotten better for you!

 

 Sent via Forum Runner on my redsn0w iOS 5.1 iPhone 4 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
Posted
It's because the 3GS has a certain boot rom that makes every jailbreak untethered.

 

 Sent via Forum Runner on my redsn0w iOS 5.1 iPhone 4 

 

the newer boot rom 3Gs' are limited to tethered on iOS 5.1 right now. They changed the bootrom midstream, but my replacement still had the old one.

 

Sent from Joshs iPhone 3Gs using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gopher_otis Member Level: 1x Advanced

gopher_otis

Posted
Posted

 

the newer boot rom 3Gs' are limited to tethered on iOS 5.1 right now. They changed the bootrom midstream' date=' but my replacement still had the old one.[/quote']Oh crap, I didn't know they changed it. Very clever Apple.

 

 Sent via Forum Runner on my redsn0w iOS 5.1 iPhone 4 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deval Member Level: LTE Advanced

Deval

Posted
Posted

Thanks. And actually that is 21087. The first real world PRL that has an ACQ record for 800SMR! I see it attached to SID 22439 in the NY Geo area.

 

So this will "see" 800mhz CDMA sites?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
Posted

Are there any CDMA 800 sites to be found anyway???

 

Yes, there are 2 confirmed in the Chicago area & one unconfirmed in the LA area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

So this will "see" 800mhz CDMA sites?

 

Yes. For Chicago Sprint customers, your phone will check the standard PCS channels first. If it cannot find any PCS channels it will check the 800SMR band before roaming. It will also check the PCS band for EVDO data when connected on the SMR. Kinda dumb if you ask me, if PCS EVDO was available then you wouldn't be on SMR for voice in the first place. Just wasted battery looking for a EV signal.

 

This is only on the 21xxx PRLs on 800SMR 1XA capable phones, by the way.

 

SID/NID 22439/65535 Sprint Nextel - Chicago IL; Fort Wayne IN; Gary IN; Kenosha WI; South Bend IN Added with:

Pref Geo:Same Prio:More RoamInd:Native EVDO-Enabled:Yes

1X Scan: SMR/476 SMR/526

EV-Scan: Sprint - 0084:0AC0(Same) - PCS/150 PCS/225 PCS/325 PCS/550 PCS/625 PCS/75 PCS/475 PCS/600 PCS/50 PCS/675

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Dkoellerwx
      T-Mobile to acquire UScellular

      By Dkoellerwx · Posted

      Probably a lot of Midwest towers. Slight bias since Nebraska is a weird market, but there are tons of USCC sites that T-Mobile isn't yet co-located on. Think a similar situation in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Missouri. But some other markets, like yours, probably don't have that issue!
    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Bubble Gum
    • chamb
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By chamb · Posted

      Sticky Customers - YES, and leave them flip to the T-Mobile PLMN when needed and they will be even more likely to Stick.
    • Trip
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By Trip · Posted

      It seems to me that if the goal is to improve rural, the US Cellular buy-out would get them only part of the way there, considering there are plenty of rural areas that US Cellular does not serve.  But I also have a hard time reading it the way I think that article is, that the cost of this deal comes straight out of the $9 billion.  I mean, they're getting spectrum for their existing operations in US Cellular markets, including places that I wouldn't call rural.  (Roanoke, VA is the 9th largest city in the state, for example.)  It seems like some of it should be allocated to rural expansion, but certainly not the whole purchase price. There's also something to be said for getting the customer base of potentially sticky customers who have been used to US Cellular being the only game in town for potentially decades. - Trip
    • dkyeager
      T-Mobile to acquire UScellular

      By dkyeager · Posted

      T-Mobile has stated 15% of their sites don't have 5g triband. In WV I know WISPs had a lot of 2.5GHz, but T-Mobile was trying to buy as much as possible. More rural FWA would be a big selling point that might overcome any soft bandwidth cap slight overages. Especially since UScellular likely started offering it on c-band.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...