Jump to content

1 Gbps TD-LTE Wireless Speeds


Recommended Posts

And the test was done in just 60MHz of bandwidth? I wonder what 100MHz of bandwidth would have done? I don't think we will see this at the beginning with Clearwire, but maybe down the road it's sure possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know. That was just 60mhz. I hope clearwire works with NSN. This along with their "Six Pipe" radio head would really push Clearwire in the forefront of LTE speeds and capacity in cities. I am more shocked at the fact that they were getting 300+Mbps per 20mhz carrier.

 

 

Does anyone know if Clear plans on continuing their retail service once LTE gets turned on? I so totally want those type of speeds with unlimited in my home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am more shocked at the fact that they were getting 300+Mbps per 20mhz carrier.

 

LTE_Rates.png

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know. That was just 60mhz. I hope clearwire works with NSN. This along with their "Six Pipe" radio head would really push Clearwire in the forefront of LTE speeds and capacity in cities. I am more shocked at the fact that they were getting 300+Mbps per 20mhz carrier.

 

Too bad they are already in a contract with Ericsson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know. That was just 60mhz. I hope clearwire works with NSN. This along with their "Six Pipe" radio head would really push Clearwire in the forefront of LTE speeds and capacity in cities. I am more shocked at the fact that they were getting 300+Mbps per 20mhz carrier.

 

The major supplier of Clearwire, DragonWave, announced today an agreement with Nokia Siemens Networks' microwave transport business. That might be good news since DragonWave's largest customer is Clearwire.

 

Source:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon and AT&T users can use their capped 2 GB plans for the month in less than 3 seconds!

 

:lol: You beat me to it. I was just about to type the same thing until I refreshed first and saw your post.

 

What's the point of these insanely high speeds with such low caps on all the data plans these companies have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the point of these insanely high speeds?

 

The qualifying prepositional phrase "with such low caps on all the data plans these companies have" is unnecessary. The above question alone is sufficient.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The qualifying prepositional phrase "with such low caps on all the data plans these companies have" is unnecessary. The above question alone is sufficient.

 

AJ

 

I think we should take it one step further and all just talk like Yoda.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The qualifying prepositional phrase "with such low caps on all the data plans these companies have" is unnecessary. The above question alone is sufficient.

 

AJ

 

That's obvious.... I need to stream several HD movies at once. It's the only way I have time to watch them all since I spend so much time reading the forums on S4GRU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should take it one step further and all just talk like Yoda.

 

"Unnecessary, the qualifying phrase is. Sufficient alone, the question is."

 

How is that?

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should take it one step further and all just talk like Yoda.

 

Judge me by my syntax, do you?

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the point of these insanely high speeds with such low caps on all the data plans these companies have?

 

To gouge their customers and make tons of money on data overage fees. ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need these speeds so that Google Instant will show our search results before we even know what we wanted to search for. No longer will it be information when you want it. It will now be information before you need it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think those speeds are for stationary terminals, not mobile. Not many phones can accommodate 8x8 MIMO. But it does brings to mind that Clearwire can go after home internet connections or even bundle home and mobile access. Now, can you imagine how much power the radio amplifiers will draw for a 100MHz channel? Yikes!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think those speeds are for stationary terminals, not mobile. Not many phones can accommodate 8x8 MIMO. But it does brings to mind that Clearwire can go after home internet connections or even bundle home and mobile access. Now, can you imagine how much power the radio amplifiers will draw for a 100MHz channel? Yikes!

 

Probably too much power. I only see standard sized Clear modems using that sort of power and connection. USB devices are just too small and the USB port just can't push enough power to it to use that kind of power. But we just won't know until Clearwire starts the upgrade next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need these speeds so that Google Instant will show our search results before we even know what we wanted to search for. No longer will it be information when you want it. It will now be information before you need it.
oh man tmi!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 503ducati

I'm guessing some may have already seen these videos of trials in Phoenix, AZ. early 2011.

 

 

 

http://www.lightread...?doc_id=205968

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkieK-mRBlk&feature=player_embedded

 

 

 

Sprint's Bob Azzi Talks LTE-Advanced(video)

OCTOBER 31, 2011 | Dan Jones |

 

http://www.lightreading.com/video.asp?doc_id=214055&

 

 

Clearwire, Sequans Fine Tuning TD-LTE

 

May 7th 2012

 

http://www.wirelessw...-tuning-TD-LTE/

Edited by 503ducati
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Straight from John Saw (via Kevin Fitchard at GigaOm), the Clearwire plan is to deploy a TD-LTE 20 MHz carrier, later to follow up with another TD-LTE 20 MHz carrier for 40 MHz carrier aggregation. Plans do not extend to 60 MHz, 80 MHz, nor 100 MHz bandwidth. So, can we now put to bed the ridiculous carrier aggregation and peak speed speculation?

 

http://gigaom.com/broadband/clearwire-you-want-fast-4g-hows-168-mbps/

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a follow up thought to John Saw's statements referenced above, Clearwire might consider dropping many of its EBS 2600 MHz leases as it shutters WiMAX over the next few years. That would cut costs, yet Clearwire would still retain up to 55.5 MHz of contiguous BRS 2600 MHz spectrum (BRS2, E, F, H blocks), which would jive nicely with Clearwire's TD-LTE 40 MHz bandwidth plans.

 

http://wireless.fcc....S-BandPlans.pdf

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...