Jump to content

Is Sprint planning to deploy 60 GHz or 80 GHz microwave backhaul in Network Vision?


Recommended Posts

Just curious if anyone knew if Sprint is planning to deploy microwave backhaul at 60 GHz or 80 GHz during Network Vision? I know that 60 GHz is unlicensed spectrum while 80 GHz is licensed spectrum so I would think that 80 GHz backhaul would be more costly. It appears that 80 GHz backhaul has a few benefits over 60 GHz backhaul in that it can travel farther and has higher overall throughput capacity.

 

Millimeter-wave (60 GHz) E-Band (80 GHz) Range 3 Km 5 Km Throughput 1 Gbps 10 Gbps Frequency 57-64 GHz 71-84 GHz Licensed No Yes

 

http://www.wimax.com/microwave-backhaul/backhaul-for-wimax-top-8-technical-considerations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious if anyone knew if Sprint is planning to deploy microwave backhaul at 60 GHz or 80 GHz during Network Vision? I know that 60 GHz is unlicensed spectrum while 80 GHz is licensed spectrum so I would think that 80 GHz backhaul would be more costly. It appears that 80 GHz backhaul has a few benefits over 60 GHz backhaul in that it can travel farther and has higher overall throughput capacity.

 

Millimeter-wave (60 GHz) E-Band (80 GHz) Range 3 Km 5 Km Throughput 1 Gbps 10 Gbps Frequency 57-64 GHz 71-84 GHz Licensed No Yes

 

http://www.wimax.com...-considerations

 

I have recently seen some of the Backhaul contract awards. To me it appears that the contracts for the backhaul put the entire burden on the vendor. They provide a complete package. Ethernet via AAV, Microwave, fiber...whatever. Then NV OEM's take the ethernet connection left for them at every site and connect it all up. How the vendor gets the ethernet to the site is largely up to them. I imagine each backhaul vendor will have their own microwave schemes and you will see tons of variability between vendors.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can those specific microwaves used for LTE? This article stated those microwaves used to support WiMax network

 

I am pretty sure that 60 GHz and 80 GHz microwave backhaul is applicable to both WiMax and LTE. Those 2 frequency ranges are common for microwave backhaul.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can those specific microwaves used for LTE?

 

I use my microwave for popcorn.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And one frequency doesn't provide more bandwidth than the other. It all depends on the modulation scheme and channel width they can use. As you go higher in the spectrum you also have to worry about more rainfade.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And one frequency doesn't provide more bandwidth than the other. It all depends on the modulation scheme and channel width they can use. As you go higher in the spectrum you also have to worry about more rainfade.

 

Yes indeed. And to compensate for rainfade, they have to make higher frequency links shorter and shorter distances.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have recently seen some of the Backhaul contract awards. To me it appears that the contracts for the backhaul put the entire burden on the vendor. They provide a complete package. Ethernet via AAV, Microwave, fiber...whatever. Then NV OEM's take the ethernet connection left for them at every site and connect it all up. How the vendor gets the ethernet to the site is largely up to them. I imagine each backhaul vendor will have their own microwave schemes and you will see tons of variability between vendors.

 

Robert

 

The backhaul component is very interesting. Do you have any other examples, like you provided with the Chicago rollout (like boston :))

 

I've always been curious how the backhaul vendor effects the end-user's experience and how local backhaul actually ties into the sprint network.

 

I would love to hear any insight on how they choose backhaul, the performance difference between vendors (say AT&T vs. Level 3, Comcast, etc).

 

Lastly, how often does sprint actually have their own fiber reach a base station?

Edited by irev210
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why doesn't microwave their own fiber when they can? They do have fiber in a few U.S. cities but not the metro loops needed to bring them to the tower. So I wonder if they ever considered microwaving it from their IP Node to the tower.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lastly, how often does sprint actually have their own fiber reach a base station?

 

I'm assuming where ever Sprint can provide local loop access, they can do that.

Edited by Deval
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why doesn't microwave their own fiber when they can?

 

Instant oatmeal is a good way to microwave fiber.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Instant oatmeal is a good way to microwave fiber.

 

AJ

 

If it can be done in a timely matter and within NV's budget, i'm all for it.

 

:rofl: That is so funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming where ever Sprint can provide local loop access, they can do that.

 

I am just curious how often that happens. I am also curious if a base station hooked directly into sprint's network performs better than one that is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am just curious how often that happens. I am also curious if a base station hooked directly into sprint's network performs better than one that is not.

Here's a pic of Sprint's fiber network in N. America.

oatmeal-and-craisins.jpg

Or maybe it's this,

North-America-GMPLS.png

can't really tell the difference.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Luckily, that hasn't arisen in my area where I am, aside from having B14 (well, ALL of AT&T signal) not work at all in Coosa county, Alabama. I wish there was a service for first responders that would go to ANY available carrier, provider, etc..and in the absolute worst case scenario, would give us service. I've been on an ambulance, trying to find an address, and my driver actually had to pull over and we pulled out a map book and tried to find the road using the "old fashioned way".. and that takes valuable time away that sometimes may be vital to someone surviving. BUT, I will say that I've only seen that in Coosa county... both my Tmo and AT&T phones had zero service and I couldn't get GPS, and neither could my driver (VZW service). Maybe satellite will help with that in those times where that occurs.. but that's an extreme example.     Edit to add: Let me add some context to this.. Coosa county isn't regular coverage area for my job.. so it's not a regular thing that we are dispatched to Coosa county.. and actually, there's been a change and that county now has it's own ambulance service that operates.. so the only time we might receive a request is if it's a multiple casualty scenario, or it's a transfer going home from our contracted hospital.  The way that reads above, it may seem like we are just out without some sort of GPS gadget to direct us on where to go, but for the most part, we know our coverage area pretty well. Dispatch can also give us cross streets for reference inside our coverage area (and our home county). Coosa just isn't a regular area for my job to run in. 
    • "Priority" doesn't mean "exclusivity."  When emergency services don't need B14, AT&T can use it for everyone else.  The trade-off is that when it is needed for emergency services, they not only get all of B14, but they have also arranged for priority on the rest of the AT&T network as well.  Beats having spectrum sitting unused most of the time and then not having enough when disaster strikes, as it could be without a partnership with a wireless company like AT&T. - Trip
    • I've wondered if being on the first responder plan has the priority over other 'regular' lines in the same way firstnet does (or, supposed to do with B14...I've seen normal customers on AT&T hit B14 so it's not {specifically} for Firstnet only)...  
    • T-Mobile prices people pay are all over the map. The free lines are key, so take them if ever offered again.  Your priority level would be a key factor for your price.  Only T-Mobile would know the average prices people pay.  Samsung has been offering very good deals at time of new model introductions so I have gone that route for factory unlocked, which allows me to also have a Verizon priority MVNO for when T-Mobile signal fails or I manually override.
    • I also wanted to post a speed test result.. I only do these once in a while from my home area because we are gonna be the last to see changes, like load balancing.  Right now they are digging all over the place for fiber installs, so I'm not sure what the hold-up is on making the upload speed a little more in-line with download speeds, but here is the most recent from my area:   https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/10133670525
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...