Jump to content

Anyone surprised Sprint hasn't announced the Galaxy Nexus release date/preorder date yet?

ericdabbs

By ericdabbs
in Samsung

 Share

Recommended Posts

MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
Posted
Pre-order sold out! Our Galaxy Nexus pre-order inventory has been spoken for. Check back on April 22 for the national launch.

 

Amazed they sold out...

 

That was fast!

 

Sent from Joshs Evo Shift using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pyroscott Member Level: LTE Advanced

pyroscott

Posted
Posted

Pre-order sold out! Our Galaxy Nexus pre-order inventory has been spoken for. Check back on April 22 for the national launch.

 

Amazed they sold out...

 

I would have preordered it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
irev210 Member Level: 4G WiMax

irev210

Posted
Posted

I wonder if the Sprint version will have the qualcomm radio?

 

My phone does say "qualcomm 4G" on the bottom near the charging port. Is that on the Verizon version?

 

Yes, after a quick google search, qualcomm 4g sticker is on the verizon version as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
legion125 Member Level: 4G WiMax

legion125

Posted
Posted

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I read that Samsung was using an off-brand radio and and a good chunk of Verizon users were complaining about reception issues. There was some debate on other sites that Samsung would use a different radio to fix the issue. Perhaps that was lumped in with the other rumors about the Gnex getting an uprated processor and camera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
irev210 Member Level: 4G WiMax

irev210

Posted
Posted

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I read that Samsung was using an off-brand radio and and a good chunk of Verizon users were complaining about reception issues. There was some debate on other sites that Samsung would use a different radio to fix the issue. Perhaps that was lumped in with the other rumors about the Gnex getting an uprated processor and camera.

 

yeah, it uses a VIA CDMA chip and a Samsung LTE chip

 

Not sure why they have to put a qualcomm sticker on every phone...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4ringsnbr Member Level: 3G EVDO

4ringsnbr

Posted
Posted

yeah, it uses a VIA CDMA chip and a Samsung LTE chip

 

Not sure why they have to put a qualcomm sticker on every phone...

Qualcomm invented CDMA and anybody's CDMA modem must pay Qualcomm royalties. It's one of the reasons CDMA didn't take over globally despite its superiority over GSM. It's bad news that the Sprint version still has that VIA chip-- it gives poorer CDMA connections in marginal (-90 dBm and below) signal areas. There were numerous complaints with the Verizon version, but Sprint has even more marginal to poor signal areas since its 1x carriers are all on PCS (right now at least) instead of Cellular 850.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pyroscott Member Level: LTE Advanced

pyroscott

Posted
Posted

Qualcomm invented CDMA and anybody's CDMA modem must pay Qualcomm royalties. It's one of the reasons CDMA didn't take over globally despite its superiority over GSM. It's bad news that the Sprint version still has that VIA chip-- it gives poorer CDMA connections in marginal (-90 dBm and below) signal areas. There were numerous complaints with the Verizon version, but Sprint has even more marginal to poor signal areas since its 1x carriers are all on PCS (right now at least) instead of Cellular 850.

 

I'd like to see the proof that the LTE chip actually gets poorer CDMA connections. Sounds like rumormongering.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4ringsnbr Member Level: 3G EVDO

4ringsnbr

Posted
Posted

I'd like to see the proof that the LTE chip actually gets poorer CDMA connections. Sounds like rumormongering.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

It's not the LTE chip that is an issue-- the Nexus uses Samsung's CMC221 for that task... it is the CDMA (1x/EVDO) 3G chip that has an issue. And a friend of mine who works for Verizon confirmed that they did have slightly more reception issues with the GNex on 3G / 1x versus the HTC and Moto handsets. Compare your 3G CDMA signal strength with an HTC or Moto handset on Verizon in the same spot and you'll see a couple (1 - 5) dBm worse signal on average.

 

The LTE chip (CMC221) has nothing at all to do with your CDMA connections. On the GNex that comes from the Via Telecom CBP 7.1 which provides the 3G EVDO and 1x CDMA voice connection. This chip was also used on the Droid Charge and both handsets have a ton of posts documenting user issues with the CDMA signal quality on these handsets-- this is old news. The LTE performance of the GNex is top notch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pyroscott Member Level: LTE Advanced

pyroscott

Posted
Posted

Her CDMA RSSI was slightly higher but I suspect it was from a higher Ec/Io number on the nexus. Also, it almost looked like we were connected to different towers.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4ringsnbr Member Level: 3G EVDO

4ringsnbr

Posted
Posted

Her CDMA RSSI was slightly higher but I suspect it was from a higher Ec/Io number on the nexus. Also, it almost looked like we were connected to different towers.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Do more comparisons in many other places side-by-side. On average, you'll find the Samsung will tend to have a lower signal strength on CDMA / 3G. Perhaps not ALWAYS, but typically. I really wanted to get a GNex over my RAZR MAXX, but there is NO way I'll ever have a non-Qualcomm chip handling my calls-- the LTE data I'm not as particular about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

 

Do more comparisons in many other places side-by-side. On average, you'll find the Samsung will tend to have a lower signal strength on CDMA / 3G. Perhaps not ALWAYS, but typically. I really wanted to get a GNex over my RAZR MAXX, but there is NO way I'll ever have a non-Qualcomm chip handling my calls-- the LTE data I'm not as particular about.

 

Totally agree on that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pyroscott Member Level: LTE Advanced

pyroscott

Posted
Posted

 

Do more comparisons in many other places side-by-side. On average, you'll find the Samsung will tend to have a lower signal strength on CDMA / 3G. Perhaps not ALWAYS, but typically. I really wanted to get a GNex over my RAZR MAXX, but there is NO way I'll ever have a non-Qualcomm chip handling my calls-- the LTE data I'm not as particular about.

 

I'll try to remember

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Was in Red Hook again and I swear there are more Link5G sites as there are Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T small cells combined in the entire neighborhood. It seemed like every other street I turned down had one installed. Hopefully carriers will start hopping on them soon. Seems like a lot of effort to go through for no one to use them.  — — — — — T-Mobile converted the Sprint site on top of NYU Langone Brooklyn in Sunset Park. I first mapped one sector of it back in November 2023 but I thought it was a small cell so I never pinned it but I ran into another sector today which caught me off guard. I'm unable to find a permit for the conversion so it's definitely a surprise. There's another T-Mobile site 1 block away that T-Mobile initially installed back in 2019 so I'm kinda surprised they're keeping both considering the Sprint conversion is on a much taller building and could potentially provide much better coverage to the entire area.  — — — — — The old permit expired for this site without any work being done but a new permit was just approved a few days ago for a T-Mobile site at this address. Description mentions 3 antennas with 2 RRUs per sector. My guess is they're doing something similar to what they did at 360 Furman St in Brooklyn where they broadcast Band 2/66 and n25/41 from one antenna. It's a bit of a downgrade considering the site it's replacing was a full build with Ericsson 6449s. 
    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Still not seeing any ULS postings for pending T-Mobile UScellular merger in Dane county Wisconsin.
    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Came across another Crown Castle Solutions multi-tenant oDAS node in Brooklyn. Located at 40.7002286, -73.9612666. Nothing on T-Mobile or AT&T so I'm assuming these are all Verizon nodes that Crown Castle is anticipating another carrier will hop on down the line.
    • dkyeager
      Galaxy S22 thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Same with factory unlocked
    • PedroDaGr8
      Galaxy S22 thread

      By PedroDaGr8 · Posted

      June security update is out (S22U TMO)

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...