Jump to content

Sprint's Q1 Earnings Report (May 5th, 2015)


Ascertion

Recommended Posts

Marcelo: "It's going to be a MASSIVE densifcation of our network." "We are right now in the final stages, where we're selecting vendors...Balancing Macro/Pico Cells (counts)" 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connections. Includes m2m, wholesale, etc

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Would still put sprint at 3rd overall. I was under the assumption this was supposedly the quarter sprint fell to 4th, and lost subscribers, not gained them
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would still put sprint at 3rd overall. I was under the assumption this was supposedly the quarter sprint fell to 4th, and lost subscribers, not gained them

 

They're still losing phone customers.  Basically their MVNOs and tablet sales are keeping them growing.  It was good to see their churn % fall below 2.  Might mean the worst of the phone losses might be behind them.  But if they do want to hold onto #3 they will need to get that turned positive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint reports a loss for Q4 2014 struggles to amid competition and departing customers.

 

 

http://www.androidcentral.com/sprint-reports-loss-continues-struggle-departing-customers

 

Yeah they made some very stupid decisions one of them over paying to get the Iphone which has taken Softbank to get that money back. The only thing they should be doing it putting up new towers like crazy and updating their current network but overall just improve their network coverage.  Either way at this point it might be good for them to merge with T-Mobile and work with Google more on their new service as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with Claure, I don't really care about what place they're in as long as everything shows improvement. And everything is improving, so yey.

#GettingBetterEveryday

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're still losing phone customers.  Basically their MVNOs and tablet sales are keeping them growing.  It was good to see their churn % fall below 2.  Might mean the worst of the phone losses might be behind them.  But if they do want to hold onto #3 they will need to get that turned positive. 

Unless I read the newsroom report wrong I see total net postpaid additions 211,000 with 41,000 loss for total of 170,000 (postpaid) additions.

That's pretty good...actually damn good for what Sprint has gone through.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint reports a loss for Q4 2014 struggles to amid competition and departing customers.

 

 

http://www.androidcentral.com/sprint-reports-loss-continues-struggle-departing-customers

 

Yeah they made some very stupid decisions one of them over paying to get the Iphone which has taken Softbank to get that money back. The only thing they should be doing it putting up new towers like crazy and updating their current network but overall just improve their network coverage. Either way at this point it might be good for them to merge with T-Mobile and work with Google more on their new service as well.

They made a commitment to buy certain amount of iPhones. They didn't overpay per unit.

 

Of course it'd be good to reduce competition for sprint TMO. And bad for consumers. Bye unlimited.

Anyway by the time a new fcc is seated to consider the merger in mid 2017, TMO and sprint will likely have made "too much" progress to argue they NEEED a merger.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I read the newsroom report wrong I see total net postpaid additions 211,000 with 41,000 loss for total of 170,000 (postpaid) additions.

That's pretty good...actually damn good for what Sprint has gone through.

The way his post is worded, he is talking about post-paid phone customers. The net adds includes tablets pumping things up (Sprint isn't the only carrier doing this). The bullet immediately below is

  • Postpaid phone losses of 201,000 improved sequentially for the fourth consecutive quarter and improved by nearly 500,000 year-over-year

Still signs of things potentially turning around...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I read the newsroom report wrong I see total net postpaid additions 211,000 with 41,000 loss for total of 170,000 (postpaid) additions.

That's pretty good...actually damn good for what Sprint has gone through.

They lost postpaid phones 210k

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint adds 1.2 million net additions to its platform for fiscal Q4, its highest total in three years

 

 

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sprint-adds-1.2-million-net-additions-to-its-platform-for-fiscal-Q4-its-highest-total-in-three-years_id68989

 

 

If they can keep making some network improvements that will hopefully keep things going in the right direction.. :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They made a commitment to buy certain amount of iPhones. They didn't overpay per unit.

 

Of course it'd be good to reduce competition for sprint TMO. And bad for consumers. Bye unlimited.

Anyway by the time a new fcc is seated to consider the merger in mid 2017, TMO and sprint will likely have made "too much" progress to argue they NEEED a merger.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not unless they are still losing money. Both carrier haven't made a year end profit in years. This is the strongest argument for a merger. In a the U.S. vzw and ATT make rather large profits and sprint and T-Mobile lose money which is not a situation that argues well for four carriers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I read the newsroom report wrong I see total net postpaid additions 211,000 with 41,000 loss for total of 170,000 (postpaid) additions.

That's pretty good...actually damn good for what Sprint has gone through.

 

That was the net postpaid amount.  All of those were tablet additions.  They lost 201,000 phone customers.  That's a continued improvement from last year and earlier quarters.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was the net postpaid amount.  All of those were tablet additions.  They lost 201,000 phone customers.  That's a continued improvement from last year and earlier quarters.  

 

it's important to keep this all in context too, they have over 50 million customers, 200k losses accounts for 0.4% or less of their total customers..they're not hemmoraging customers like they were, and they're slowing and offsetting losses. postpaid adds will come with network improvements, they have so far.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not unless they are still losing money. Both carrier haven't made a year end profit in years. This is the strongest argument for a merger. In a the U.S. vzw and ATT make rather large profits and sprint and T-Mobile lose money which is not a situation that argues well for four carriers.

 

TMO (and Sprint?) was losing money in 2011 when FCC, DOJ said NO

TMO and Sprint were losing money in 2014 when FCC, DOJ said NO

 

Look at DT capital markets 2015. Legere said TMO is way ahead of his team's expectations back in 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's important to keep this all in context too, they have over 50 million customers, 200k losses accounts for 0.4% or less of their total customers..they're not hemmoraging customers like they were, and they're slowing and offsetting losses. postpaid adds will come with network improvements, they have so far.

 

The only reason it matters is that those phone customers are the highest revenue customers.  They also tend to be stick around the longest because you have them on phone leases or Easy Pay.  But the good thing is the trend-line is going in a positive direction.  Slowly, but surely.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's important to keep this all in context too, they have over 50 million customers, 200k losses accounts for 0.4% or less of their total customers..they're not hemmoraging customers like they were, and they're slowing and offsetting losses. postpaid adds will come with network improvements, they have so far.

 

I'm very disappointed there was no 2.5 Ghz news; that can only mean not much progress was made last 3 months.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very disappointed there was no 2.5 Ghz news; that can only mean not much progress was made last 3 months.

Most 2.5 deployment has shifted to priority markets. That won't add more pops of coverage, but it will improve network quality in those markets.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TMO (and Sprint?) was losing money in 2011 when FCC, DOJ said NO

TMO and Sprint were losing money in 2014 when FCC, DOJ said NO

Right. But those where the decision of the ideological bent of the current FCC. In 2017 we are likely to have a different ideology governing the FCC, one that might be more inclined to listen to what the market seems to be saying. It does no good to have four national carriers unless they are all profitable, otherwise we end up with three or less anyway and have to go through bankruptcy rather than a merger to get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...