Jump to content
lilotimz

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RAvirani said:

I think it would be great if Sprint could pick some spectrum in the CBRS band—I could definitely see their NR network being primarily 2.5/3.5 GHz. Additionally, if CBRS spectrum were used for NR with massive MIMO, it would be a good overlay for the L1900 grid as it would have comparable coverage/range. 

Your point about roaming is definitely true too. It would be nice for us to roam in other countries on the same band as back home; additionally, with spectrum that lines up with international providers, Sprint may be able to break into the US international roaming market (which AT&T and T-Mobile primarily dominate today). 

 

1 hour ago, Fraydog said:

As it is, it’s time for Sprint to be active in spectrum auctions again. mmWave and CBRS are all needed.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

 

In the interview that Sprint's new CFO did today, he said that Sprint is content with what it has right now and doesn't see itself buying mmWave but if spectrum comes up for auction (non mmWave), Sprint will consider it. I think that's good news!

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Paynefanbro said:

 

In the interview that Sprint's new CFO did today, he said that Sprint is content with what it has right now and doesn't see itself buying mmWave but if spectrum comes up for auction (non mmWave), Sprint will consider it. I think that's good news!

Hmm...spectrum that could come up for auction that isn’t mmWave...wonder what that could be 😏…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, RAvirani said:

Hmm...spectrum that could come up for auction that isn’t mmWave...wonder what that could be 😏…

Sorry... what would it be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RedSpark said:

Sorry... what would it be?

According to FierceWireless Ajit Pai mentioned earlier this year that he is trying to auction off 28Ghz spectrum this November and that in the coming months he "intends to propose the next steps needed to make the 3.7 to 4.2 GHz band available for commercial terrestrial use"

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, RedSpark said:

Sorry... what would it be?

cmWave of course ;) .

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎3‎/‎3‎/‎2018 at 2:18 PM, Fraydog said:

 


Isn’t Sprint faster in Chicago? I have friends up there and they seem to be saying Sprint has been faster there for a while.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Sorry about my late reply. My online reading S4GRU has been very limited the past few months.

Sprint has been advertising using Schaumburg in their Chicago speed test examples. While I'm sure Sprint service in Schaumburg has improved throughout the past few years since I had Sprint, I was very impressed by it in Schaumburg back then, just not so much in some other areas. By now it looks like Sprint is doing really well around here, which is good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry about my late reply. My online reading S4GRU has been very limited the past few months.
Sprint has been advertising using Schaumburg in their Chicago speed test examples. While I'm sure Sprint service in Schaumburg has improved throughout the past few years since I had Sprint, I was very impressed by it in Schaumburg back then, just not so much in some other areas. By now it looks like Sprint is doing really well around here, which is good.
T-Mobile has some Wicked speeds.3239ecaedb78f36a70eb47fedd177b0e.jpg

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of these speedtests by all of these carriers are great. What I am looking for is consistent coverage and consistent speeds. It does not help me if in one spot it's 150Mbits and then in another 3G. I would be perfectly happy if it was consistently between 10-20Mbits throughout the coverage area.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/20/2018 at 11:33 AM, bigsnake49 said:

All of these speedtests by all of these carriers are great. What I am looking for is consistent coverage and consistent speeds. It does not help me if in one spot it's 150Mbits and then in another 3G. I would be perfectly happy if it was consistently between 10-20Mbits throughout the coverage area.

T-Mobile just upgraded the only stealth site in town and gave it tri band lte...4X4 MIMO and 256 QAM...the signal at the coverage edge is a bit dirty but it works none the less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, danlodish345 said:

TMobile has a gotten good..

Screenshot_20180407-030305_Speedtest.jpg

I like that ping. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I like that ping. 
Yeah the thing is really low which is amazing. It used to be in the mid-forties about a year ago. So they've gotten better.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sigh...

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sigh...

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk


What's the problem?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What's the problem?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Those speeds are making me envious lol. We are still waiting on a site they've been meaning to build for quite sometime, till then we can't expect those nice speeds.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Those speeds are making me envious lol. We are still waiting on a site they've been meaning to build for quite sometime, till then we can't expect those nice speeds.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Well the speeds aren't like that all over town and it's really only at night when the network is unloaded

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well at times we can reach 20 between midnight and 6am. Other areas do pretty good despite the spectrum constraints in the Cincinnati market.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well at times we can reach 20 between midnight and 6am. Other areas do pretty good despite the spectrum constraints in the Cincinnati market.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk


Yes I understand where you're coming from is only 55 mega Hertz total over here

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes I understand where you're coming from is only 55 mega Hertz total over here

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Once they flip the switch on our 5mhz of B66 here in the area(which I hope it's soon) it should help.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Once they flip the switch on our 5mhz of B66 here in the area(which I hope it's soon) it should help.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

TMobile has come a very long way here but they still have a long way to go and terms of coverage and actual overall signal strength.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.pcmag.com/news/360673/t-mobile-5g-wont-start-out-much-faster-than-4g

This sums up T-Mobile’s 5G Deployment Issue:

According to Karri Kuoppamaki, T-Mobile's VP of radio network technology development and strategy, higher-frequency millimeter wave spectrum only has cells about 900 feet wide, though Verizon's chief network officer Nicola Palmer said last year that they can get gigabit speeds at 2,000 feet from a cell.

_______

So that’s a 900 foot cell radius which comes out to 0.1 square miles. The continental US is over 3 million square miles. T-Mobile’s 600MHz network doesn’t have the carrying capacity for true 5G speeds so it will need to supplement with millimeter wave in high-speed hotspots.... and the economics for a wide deployment of that are hard to justify.

VS.

Dr. Saw previously said this about Millimeter Wave:

https://www.lightreading.com/mobile/5g/sprint-says-no-to-mmwave-yes-to-mobile-5g/d/d-id/739592

Sprint's CTO said Wednesday that he is not sure that using millimeter waves to deliver 5G services is a practical economic use of the high-band spectrum and that Sprint will be focusing on using its existing bandwidth to deploy 5G, at least initially.

_________

Dr. Saw’s specific quotes:

"What is the cost to deliver a bit over millimeter waves? Where is the business case on that?" John Saw asked at the Citi conference in Las Vegas.

and

"We need to solve the cost challenges before you can scale millimeter wave," Saw said.

He did say that mmWave could be useful as a hotspot "overlay" to a lower band 5G network, but he added that "the laws of physics say it won't propagate very far."

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another interesting bit from that PCMag article is this;

Quote

But the value in low-band 5G isn't its initial state; it's the ramp-up. 5G technology has a lot more room to grow than 4G, even if it's starting out just a bit ahead of current speeds.

"Initially, we didn't see gigabit speeds on LTE; we saw very low speeds. But today we see much higher than that. It's kind of irrelevant what [the speed] number is going to be on day one, as it will improve over time," Kuoppamaki said.

T-Mobile can't provide gigabit speeds on 600MHz alone whereas they can on LTE through CA and numerous technologies. Sprint can achieve gigabit speeds on both 5G-NR and LTE at the same time using Band 41. That's a huge advantage and Sprint should focus on playing up that advantage and increasing density quickly so that most cities, suburbs, and even some exurbs are blanketed in Band 41.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Paynefanbro said:

Another interesting bit from that PCMag article is this;

T-Mobile can't provide gigabit speeds on 600MHz alone whereas they can on LTE through CA and numerous technologies. Sprint can achieve gigabit speeds on both 5G-NR and LTE at the same time using Band 41. That's a huge advantage and Sprint should focus on playing up that advantage and increasing density quickly so that most cities, suburbs, and even some exurbs are blanketed in Band 41.

That’s a huge advantage for Sprint.

Sprint’s PR/Comms shop needs to be on the ball here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

T-Mobile has become better around here since the initial introduction of BingeOn and the all-unlimited plans. However still not excellent quite yet. I've had some issues at an outdoor mall I've gone to a few times recently, but I'm not sure its necessarily the network. I definitely need a new phone - waiting for the Sony XZ2 Premium, so it may be the limitations of the Microsoft Lumia 950xl I'm still using, grudgingly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By DesignGuy
      Fierce has a poll posted... and is utilizing a bracket style contest to find out who their readers think is the most powerful person in the telecom industry. Between Marcelo and the pink clad Chihuahua of a man... I give it to Marcelo. I think the final winner should be Masa, it's is a name people know and will get to know more in the coming years worldwide. But for the current poll, it's an easy decision for me!  
       
      http://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/vote-now-to-decide-who-most-powerful-person-u-s-telecom-industry
       
       
       
    • By derrph
      With the introduction of the new plans Sprint has announced. I told one of my friends about the $60 unlimited plan and she was shocked yet happy about it. She currently has T-Mobile and there has been times where my Sprint service has out performed her service even in the city with puling up information and out of town...well... you already know how that went. She was talking about switching and stuff but then she sent me a typical article bashing Sprint and I got irritated by it and I had to explain to her that Sprint is not bad at all. These articles are based on past experiences from 3+ years ago. I told her I'm pulling 60+ mbps on LTE but she's worried about Sprint being slow ( because of what she read). Guys give me some advice on persuading her to give Sprint a chance. 
       
      I feel like articles that are being posted is what keeps away customers.  It makes no sense that T-Mobiles 2g network is not spoken about when they are in the news for changes to plans and such. But good ol Sprint makes changes and articles that get posted rips Sprint apart for filth. 
    • By belusnecropolis
      http://ces.cnet.com/8301-35284_1-57616761/how-i-got-t-mobiles-ceo-kicked-out-of-at-ts-ces-party/
      Roger Cheng @cnet appears to have had the most fun out of this, it kind of wrote the story for him I guess, so there is that. Also, just noticed the extra title Q, that is gonna drive some people nuts today. Top lel.
    • By Paynefanbro
      Am I the only one that likes to look at Verizon's coverage comparison tool. I think it gives a good idea of a carrier's generalized coverage as far as those cities that have been announced. However, it takes a while for it to get updated. I look at Verizon's map and think, no one will ever build an LTE network of that size. When I look at T-Mobile, I see a spotty, spread out network. AT&T is also spotty with a few highways covered here and there. Sprint seems to be more put together as in even if it is spotty, they are in blobs rather than random remote areas.
       
      I've also found a few places that Sprint has coverage in but not Verizon such as in southern Texas.
       
      http://www.verizonwireless.com/wcms/consumer/4g-lte.html
    • By kripatel
      I'm a former sprint customer, and recently moved to T-mobile.  The main reason I moved to T-mobile had to do with the speed of the network from the speed testing websites, and they seemed to be more reliable.  The second resons was that it was on GSM network which would allow for International roaming when abroad.  However, I've found that when T-mobile is available it is fast, but lacks indoor penetration, something I notieced of Sprint as well, it also is not available everywhere such as sprint overall coverage.  So I am now thinking of switching back to sprint because I live in Indiana and travel a lot on the road, which requires coverage that is not readily provided by T-mobile.
      My question, if and when Sprint moves LTE to 800mhz and 2.5Ghz, are new phones required to take advantage of that frequency or will the Moto X and Iphone 5s work on those bands?  Secondly, I read that Verizon will be shutting down its CDMA network sometime next year and move to Voicelte, I'm thinking this will effect Sprint coverage since I'm sure they use their network at times.  Any thoughts on that or has Sprint also announced moving to Voice over LTE?
      My main concern was with speed of the network, which when I have coverage with T-mobile, is much slower than Sprint (my wife still has sprint).  I'm not sure I understand why the network is slower on Sprint and whether that will improve over time specfiically in Indianapolis.  I appreciate any feedback so that I might move back to Sprint for the best long-term viability.
  • Posts

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×