Jump to content

HTC EVO 4G LTE


P_M_G

Recommended Posts

If we purchased this phone now' date=' and because Sprint does not have LTE yet, will we be able to roam on Verizon LTE?

 

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2[/quote']

 

Sprint does have LTE on over 350 sites and adding every day.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sprint does have LTE on over 350 sites and adding every day.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

 

At the rate they are deploying they seem to be much faster than VZ...right? Nation coverage in under 2yrs...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

At the rate they are deploying they seem to be much faster than VZ...right? Nation coverage in under 2yrs...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

I'm not certain the rate VZW deployed. But given that VZW is putting 700 LTE on much less total sites, Sprints deployment rate is unprecedented in wireless history as far as I can recall.

 

VZW did not install 700 LTE at every site in the markets they have deployed. They just deployed enough for seamless coverage based on 700 propagation. They are then going back and adding more in existing markets for more capacity after initial launch.

 

So even though VZW LTE deployment had been fast, that has to be kept in mind. Sprint, even if it rolls out slightly slower than VZW, will actually be much more impressive because Sprint's scope of work is so much greater.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not certain the rate VZW deployed. But given that VZW is putting 700 LTE on much less total sites, Sprints deployment rate is unprecedented in wireless history as far as I can recall.

 

VZW did not install 700 LTE at every site in the markets they have deployed. They just deployed enough for seamless coverage based on 700 propagation. They are then going back and adding more in existing markets for more capacity after initial launch.

 

So even though VZW LTE deployment had been fast, that has to be kept in mind. Sprint, even if it rolls out slightly slower than VZW, will actually be much more impressive because Sprint's scope of work is so much greater.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

 

I can attest to that. Coverage is "seamless" in St. Cloud but I am lucky to break -85bdm. I went to Minneapolis, and I was getting between -60 to -85bdm.

 

I am currently getting -117dbm LTE in my living room. Poor

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can attest to that. Coverage is "seamless" in St. Cloud but I am lucky to break -85bdm. I went to Minneapolis, and I was getting between -60 to -85bdm.

 

I am currently getting -117dbm LTE in my living room. Poor

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

-117? Do you even have usable data at that low of signal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Wow. Surprising. Upload isn't very good though.

 

No. But what would WiMax give at this signal? It's no wonder LTE won out over WiMax.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. LOL This is at -121

 

That is probably not RSSI but RSRP (or another LTE specific signal strength measure). If RSRP, one conversion factor that I have encountered is to add 14 dB.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. But what would WiMax give at this signal? It's no wonder LTE won out over WiMax.

 

Scott, come on -- that is not even a remotely relevant comparison. Honestly, you should know better than that.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. But what would WiMax give at this signal? It's no wonder LTE won out over WiMax.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Lately in Visalia, I can barely pull those speeds with almost max WiMax signal strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Scott, come on -- that is not even a remotely relevant comparison. Honestly, you should know better than that.

 

AJ

 

Right. Clearwire is not even close to representative of what WiMax is capable of.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. Clearwire is not even close to representative of what WiMax is capable of.

 

The fair comparison would be in equivalent spectrum (both in propagation and in bandwidth). And 10 MHz x 10 MHz of Upper 700 MHz spectrum is certainly not equivalent to 10 MHz (or even 5 MHz) of BRS/EBS 2600 MHz spectrum.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scott, come on -- that is not even a remotely relevant comparison. Honestly, you should know better than that.

 

AJ

 

Completely agree...put WiMax on 700MHz at same bandwidth and see what happens....

Clearwire just put a foul taste on the whole standard as they were one of the only ones using it, and on that spectrum and the way the deployment went, it can't compare to what VZ has done on 700MHz...which is what the reg consumer sees...

 

 

BUT in Scott's defense it was like 3am when he posted that, and we all know he likely knows this anyway....imho posts at those hours anything is possible. lol :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not certain the rate VZW deployed. But given that VZW is putting 700 LTE on much less total sites, Sprints deployment rate is unprecedented in wireless history as far as I can recall.

 

VZW did not install 700 LTE at every site in the markets they have deployed. They just deployed enough for seamless coverage based on 700 propagation. They are then going back and adding more in existing markets for more capacity after initial launch.

 

So even though VZW LTE deployment had been fast, that has to be kept in mind. Sprint, even if it rolls out slightly slower than VZW, will actually be much more impressive because Sprint's scope of work is so much greater.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

 

YES!!!

 

And I'm just thinking about it in simple market terms...Sprint will have LTE covered everywhere roughly that currently gets Sprint CDMA service(omitting the areas that have other providers like in west Kansas) right now within a 2yr deployment...Verizon seems to be taking longer to do theres...On top of that I'm still surprised that they are using little dots to mark LTE areas instead of a blanket coverage shaded map...

 

By 2013 end it will be interesting to see the marketing ploy Sprint goes with...ESP if VZ is still deploying its LTE then and not fully covered its service area...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sprint does have LTE on over 350 sites and adding every day.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

 

Sprint already has lte? not where I live in NJ.

 

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to know it's a solid device. And you are lucky you got to play with it at the HTC/Sprint event.

 

Yep, and a lot of good feedback from the crowds. Everyone who used it liked it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint already has lte? not where I live in NJ.

 

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2

 

Sprint sure does have LTE live in many areas now!!! :)

 

 

Welcome to the site btw!

 

Take a few min to read the section here to learn some more:

http://s4gru.com/ind...lte-deployment/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

South Jersey is not in the first two rounds of NV deployment. But Central and North Jersey and Philly are.

 

We keep maps of completed NV/LTE sites in our Sponsor section. We are just starting to create LTE coverage maps in our Premier Sponsor section.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YES!!!

 

And I'm just thinking about it in simple market terms...Sprint will have LTE covered everywhere roughly that currently gets Sprint CDMA service(omitting the areas that have other providers like in west Kansas) right now within a 2yr deployment...Verizon seems to be taking longer to do theres...On top of that I'm still surprised that they are using little dots to mark LTE areas instead of a blanket coverage shaded map...

 

By 2013 end it will be interesting to see the marketing ploy Sprint goes with...ESP if VZ is still deploying its LTE then and not fully covered its service area...

 

Yes it will be interesting to see what Verizon will say when they are still lighting up new LTE areas when Sprint finishes. I'm sure that will hurt their stockholder confidence in some way that a carrier less than half their size one upped them! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...