Jump to content

LG G Flex 2 [FCC ID ZNFLS996]


NateC

Recommended Posts

Wait I thought it could do 2 carrier of 20mhz on b41? Is it that important to have even more than 2 carriers at this point? From what I had read its 32gb internal, plus additional support for more with a microsd. And its a device with a 5.5" screen 1080p is overkill anyway, just saying. Lol

 

The table may have been expanded for clarity or I just focused on the "Total maximum bandwidth of 20Mhz" (I originally quoted the table but that was removed).   I will now wait for reviews / actual usage.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is it confirmed that this phone is full CCA compliant? I live in a market where if the speculation about US Cellular joining CCA with Sprint is true, it would be a massive perk for me. Is this a safe phone to buy if that happens?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is it confirmed that this phone is full CCA compliant? I live in a market where if the speculation about US Cellular joining CCA with Sprint is true, it would be a massive perk for me. Is this a safe phone to buy if that happens?

 

based on what i can tell by the graph that was posted, yes it is fully CCA compliant and will work with USCC LTE. I'm in the same boat you are in that would be a huge boost to sprint around here if it comes to pass :D my yearly upgrade is up in february (have the 1st flex), hopefully this is out by then as i will most likely be getting it :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am out of the upgrade mode on the new plans with 3 lines on LG G2's all bought from Swappa. I've basically decided not to do any upgrades from the G2 unless it is fully CCA compliant. I'm really in no hurry unless roaming with US Cellular goes live and then I would buy something the next day.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am out of the upgrade mode on the new plans with 3 lines on LG G2's all bought from Swappa. I've basically decided not to do any upgrades from the G2 unless it is fully CCA compliant. I'm really in no hurry unless roaming with US Cellular goes live and then I would buy something the next day.

 

comparing the graph posted in this thread to the graph in this article

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-373-teaser-x-marks-the-spot-for-the-first-sprint-ccarrpp-fully-compliant-handset/

 

it looks like the flex 2 is fully CCA compliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm only asking this out of curiosity.  Since this is CCA compliant, it appears the LTE bands it supports is also T-Mobiles (B2, B4, and B12).  Does this mean that this device could essentially run on T-Mobile's network if unlocked from Sprint (or another SIM-Unlock method)? 

 

I'm not wanting to jump ship - but my brother has a HSPA+ only phone and I'd like to see what he'd get speed-wise on LTE in my area on T-Mobile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm only asking this out of curiosity. Since this is CCA compliant, it appears the LTE bands it supports is also T-Mobiles (B2, B4, and B12). Does this mean that this device could essentially run on T-Mobile's network if unlocked from Sprint (or another SIM-Unlock method)?

 

I'm not wanting to jump ship - but my brother has a HSPA+ only phone and I'd like to see what he'd get speed-wise on LTE in my area on T-Mobile.

It should be fully compatible, with the likely exception of T-Mobile's version of WiFi-calling. I'm not sure if their VoLTE would work.

 

Sprint phones already work just fine on T-Mo 2G + W-CDMA if they've been successfully unlocked (like my S4 has been), so LTE should be no different. The question was raised earlier in this thread, however, if Sprint will domestically unlock this phone upon request, if it turns out the release date is mid-February or later. The prevailing opinion seems to be that they won't, citing the device's earlier period of "development" that predates 2/11.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm only asking this out of curiosity.  Since this is CCA compliant, it appears the LTE bands it supports is also T-Mobiles (B2, B4, and B12).  Does this mean that this device could essentially run on T-Mobile's network if unlocked from Sprint (or another SIM-Unlock method)? 

 

I'm not wanting to jump ship - but my brother has a HSPA+ only phone and I'd like to see what he'd get speed-wise on LTE in my area on T-Mobile.

 

This presumed Sprint variant LG G Flex 2 does not support band 4 W-CDMA 1700+2100.  So, outside of LTE coverage, it will not be fully functional on the T-Mobile network.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This presumed Sprint variant LG G Flex 2 does not support band 4 W-CDMA 1700+2100.  So, outside of LTE coverage, it will not be fully functional on the T-Mobile network.

 

AJ

I've thrown custom ROMs on my G2 and it has WCDMA that maxes out I think at 14mbps (haven't checked the band).  Does that mean this device has less compatibility with global usage than the G2 when not on LTE? (Outside the US?) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've thrown custom ROMs on my G2 and it has WCDMA that maxes out I think at 14mbps (haven't checked the band).  Does that mean this device has less compatibility with global usage than the G2 when not on LTE? (Outside the US?) 

 

Maybe, but not really.  For W-CDMA, few countries other than the US use band 4 AWS-1 1700+2100 MHz.  Most hitched their wagons to band 1 IMT 1900+2100 MHz.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This presumed Sprint variant LG G Flex 2 does not support band 4 W-CDMA 1700+2100. So, outside of LTE coverage, it will not be fully functional on the T-Mobile network.

Ah, good catch. While unfortunate, I don't think that omission will be too impactful. By mid-year (if you believe their projections), most full build sites will have B2 and/or B4 LTE with fallback to B2 W-CDMA, and rural GMOs will remain PCS-only for awhile. Some markets that are short on AWS may also start seeing DC-HSPA refarmed down to HSPA+21 for wideband LTE, so that the remaining B4 W-CDMA carrier won't be any faster than the B2 one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know if it will be the same as the Sprint model?

 

Nope, not for sure, but the Sprint model includes USCC LTE compatibility, so I assume the models are the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is their 1900/2100 WCDMA for HSPA+ 42?

What and where?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a b1 2100 but USA doesn't use it

There's no 1900/2100 combo

 

Band 1 is 1900+2100 MHz and has been for about 15 years.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I meant for T-Mobile US.  I thought AWS was 1700/2100, I didn't know of a combo of 1900/2100.  Is HSPA+ 42 the only thing that would be lacking on T-Mobile with this device?

 

To keep things simple, let us just refer to band 2 PCS and band 4 AWS.  T-Mobile has refarmed some of its band 4 AWS for LTE, moving some W-CDMA over to band 2 PCS -- but not everywhere across its network.  The fallback on a device without band 4 W-CDMA will be somewhat compromised on T-Mobile.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that I've decided this will be the device that replaces my G2. I can't find a good reason not to at this point. I need to have lollipop by the spring because I plan to install an aftermarket Android Auto deck so this phone seems like the winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that I've decided this will be the device that replaces my G2. I can't find a good reason not to at this point. I need to have lollipop by the spring because I plan to install an aftermarket Android Auto deck so this phone seems like the winner.

 

same here, my yearly upgrade is up on 2/1/15, so unless HTC comes out with a new phone that wows me between now and the Flex 2 being available, i'll be getting this phone :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

same here, my yearly upgrade is up on 2/1/15, so unless HTC comes out with a new phone that wows me between now and the Flex 2 being available, i'll be getting this phone :)

My only complaint about this device is the exclusives.  It'll only be for AT&T/Sprint.  This means a lot less development for the device and I like to tinker with my androids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious to know...which android auto head unit do you plan on installing and why.

 

Thanks

I am not sure yet but have some Google Alerts set up for the Pioneer, Kenwood & Parrot units that were announced at CES. Which one I ultimately select will be based on features and price. I have a bit of a unique application in that this will be replacing a 2-DIN Jensen unit in a motorhome which uses the touch screen for a backup camera image so I need to make sure that the device supports backup cameras.

 

I also do not have any steering wheel audio controls or voice recognition keys so I will need to pick one that provides all of that for me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...