Jump to content

HTC Gluuv


PDXmike

Recommended Posts

Pretty sure this is an April Fool's joke, but if not, it's amazingly ridiculous. Good for a few chuckles. :lol:

 

http://www.htc.com/www/go/gluuv/

Pretty sure it is, Samsung put something similar out too.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, read this last night, had me laughing for a while, LOL.  If you actually read the whole thing its pretty funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, read this last night, had me laughing for a while, LOL. If you actually read the whole thing its pretty funny.

The Pokemon joke put out by Google is still my favorite so far. That's probably due to that being my dream job from the ages of 4-12 :P.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pokemon joke put out by Google is still my favorite so far. That's probably due to that being my dream job from the ages of 4-12 :P.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Google probably has the best april fools joke every single year.

 

Also, "translate to emoji" for chrome on mobile devices is pretty awesome as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google probably has the best april fools joke every single year.

 

Also, "translate to emoji" for chrome on mobile devices is pretty awesome as well.

That one made me laugh for a bit, then I saw the "baby shaming" one...I'll let everyone make up their own minds on that one.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish tech companies stayed out of the "April Fools" trend. Yeah it can make you laugh, but can confuse too many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish tech companies stayed out of the "April Fools" trend. Yeah it can make you laugh, but can confuse too many.

I get where you're coming from, but is it really tech companies fault that Americans are as dumb/gullible on average as we are? I really had fun running around my local outlet malls the other day "catching Pokemon" with Google maps while I was waiting people to finish shopping...

Some of the other jokes though like the smart gloves/shoes I can see as maybe taking it a bit too far.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get where you're coming from, but is it really tech companies fault that Americans are as dumb/gullible on average as we are? I really had fun running around my local outlet malls the other day "catching Pokemon" with Google maps while I was waiting people to finish shopping...

Some of the other jokes though like the smart gloves/shoes I can see as maybe taking it a bit too far.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Oh, I think the Pokemon is a cool idea. It's the fake gadgets or fake release news, etc. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I think the Pokemon is a cool idea. It's the fake gadgets or fake release news, etc. etc.

At least they didn't push out a fake 4.4.3/new OS. That'd have been cruel

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, read this last night, had me laughing for a while, LOL.  If you actually read the whole thing its pretty funny.

One of my brothers sent me the link last night, but I didn't have a chance to look at it until this afternoon. The thumbs up to like a Facebook post and "ARMIE > SELFIE... Beautiful sunset? Pound it." had me laughing pretty good.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I think the Pokemon is a cool idea. It's the fake gadgets or fake release news, etc. etc.

Unless they're using these fake gadgets to test the waters on some ideas they have kicking around in product development. Wouldn't surprise me if someone at least looked at the responses to these to see if there is anything worth pursuing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the HTC Gluuv.  It's so bad.

 

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...