Jump to content

Sprint switches gears, backs FDD rather than TDD plan for 600 MHz auction


Recommended Posts

 

Acknowledging that an FDD allocation for the upcoming 600 MHz auction has considerably more support than the TDD approach it has been pushing, Sprint said it now supports the idea of an FDD band plan, provided it is structured to maximize "auctionable bi-directional paired spectrum."

 

Read more: Sprint switches gears, backs FDD rather than TDD plan for 600 MHz auction - FierceWirelessTech http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/sprint-switches-gears-backs-fdd-rather-tdd-plan-600-mhz-auction/2014-01-09#ixzz2pvAMgtza 

Subscribe at FierceWirelessTech

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's sad the other carriers are so dead set on FDD, it is not the most efficient mode for LTE. It if also possible that there will be isolated 6MHZ channels that become available with no possible paired channel for a discrete uplink.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So from this article, it seems Sprint is set on FDD on the 600 Mhz auction? 

Sprint originally wanted TDD for 600 MHz but it's abandoned that plan because no one else wanted it. Also, I believe that TDD isn't well suited for these lower frequencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint originally wanted TDD for 600 MHz but it's abandoned that plan because no one else wanted it. Also, I believe that TDD isn't well suited for these lower frequencies.

 

Okay, but FDD would be more ideal than? If sprint were to snag some 600 Mhz for FDD, this would make Sprint a Quad band LTE network? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, but FDD would be more ideal than? If sprint were to snag some 600 Mhz for FDD, this would make Sprint a Quad band LTE network? 

Ehh FDD VS. TDD is kind of a hot topic, but both have their strength and weaknesses. Also, Yes is if Sprint got some 600 MHz it would be quad band.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather have 1xA carriers on 600 unless Sprint switches to VoLTE

600 may propagate too well for something that works so well with a weak signal like CDMA. It almost couldn't be used in an urban environment at all. You will have lots of bars in your signal strength indicator, but the quality of the signal would get pretty crappy. It's almost too good on SMR.

 

LTE on 600, especially given the fragile LTE airlink, could prove to be pretty good. Especially in rural areas allowing one boomer tower to cover a lot of distance.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm Robert that's interesting. I've never heard that before (well I knew CDMA worked well on a  weak signal and LTE was pretty fragile).

 

What about capacity on 600 LTE? Good enough to fill in holes left by 800/1900/2500 I assume, but would only be used as a last ditch effort with the pretty low capacity, correct? Would that give the LTE coverage needed to get a leg up on VoLTE rollout?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quadband phone???? ;)

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

There are already quad band lte phones on the market for other carriers so this is not unrealistic :) Over the coming years I fully expect to see hexaband LTE phones, at least if we see sprint and tmo hop into the sack with each other. The PA's exist, there are issues right now with fitting too many antennas in phones but this will evolve. 

 

It would be interesting to see what SprinTmo and to an extent AT&T did with regard to band access. Do you allow pretty much all phones on all bands or restrict access to some bands to premium phones? Sprint have said triband for all, but if they suddenly find themselves with 6 or 7  bands (600, 700 , 800 , 1700\2100, 1900 , 2500), would this affect the cost of handsets enough to make it worthwhile to not include access to some of the bands? i.e. if you have access to 1900 LTE does it really matter to allow access to the (potential) 1700\2100 LTE. These are just idle musing rather than any suggestion Sprint may attempt to screw people or anything similar and it will be a little less complex should Sprint not buy tmo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm Robert that's interesting. I've never heard that before (well I knew CDMA worked well on a weak signal and LTE was pretty fragile).

 

What about capacity on 600 LTE? Good enough to fill in holes left by 800/1900/2500 I assume, but would only be used as a last ditch effort with the pretty low capacity, correct? Would that give the LTE coverage needed to get a leg up on VoLTE rollout?

VoLTE on 600 will provide decent coverage. It will be closer to closing the VoLTE coverage gap. Put it on 450 like Africa, and maybe close it all together.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question.... With 800 already in place wouldn't 600 just be redundant?

If no additional low frequency capacity was ever needed, then yes. But ideally, Sprint should have at least a 10MHz wide low frequency carrier. That can never happen on 800.

 

Sprint needs to do the best it can to be competitive. It will survive without any 600. But if and when it comes to market, it should try to get it.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

VoLTE on 600 will provide decent coverage. It will be closer to closing the VoLTE coverage gap. Put it on 450 like Africa, and maybe close it all together.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

I know you may just be throwing that frequency out there but isn't 450Mhz reserved for public safety in the US?  I know in my area, public safety uses 453 and 458 Mhz. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you may just be throwing that frequency out there but isn't 450Mhz reserved for public safety in the US?  I know in my area, public safety uses 453 and 458 Mhz.

 

It was used for theoretical discussion of how to close the VoLTE coverage gap. It certainly is not possible in the U.S. But I bless the rains down in Africa.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was used for theoretical discussion of how to close the VoLTE coverage gap. It certainly is not possible in the U.S. But I bless the rains down in Africa.

 

Robert

 

I thought you were speaking in theory but just making sure. Thanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was used for theoretical discussion of how to close the VoLTE coverage gap. It certainly is not possible in the U.S. But I bless the rains down in Africa.

 

Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was used for theoretical discussion of how to close the VoLTE coverage gap. It certainly is not possible in the U.S. But I bless the rains down in Africa.

 

Robert

 

No blessing of rain for california? :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore.

 

AJ

I was hoping someone would get it.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was hoping someone would get it.

 

I meet you all the way.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...