Jump to content

Is this site Legacy or NV?


Recommended Posts

So I have a tower that I've been keeping my eye on. It is a "Legacy" Marked tower, and it shows on the Maps as such. Looking at the tower, it looks legacy. Old panels still up on the tower. Now At work, I have a new NV Tower (New Panels, RRU's, etc.) and I connect to it on 3G SID: 4159 NID: 305. I go to this tower (Legacy Looking), sit right under it with a -58 signal and have the same SID: 4159 NID: 305. Now here's my big question.

 

Could this possibly be either:

 

A. GMO Site (According to a previous article, the Orlando Market didn't have any)

B. Full Build with RRU's on the Ground (Cannot tell because of where the cabinets are cannot see them)

C. Still Legacy (We are in an incumbent Market so could they be the same NID? Or does this only apply to eCSFB?)

 

Or...Am I totally off in thinking that the SID/NID are different with Legacy/NV Equip?

 

Any insight is appreciated.

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe SID/NID is the same between Legacy and NV. Some one correct me if I'm wrong.

 

On the Legacy site in question, you've identified it still has legacy panels but what about the base stations? If your location is still Florida, that would be Ericsson. Check to see if you can see any new base stations. That would give you an indication progress is underway and hopefully it will be a full build.

 

Pics would help too  :tu:

 

This site in Kansas is a full build but RRUs mounted on ground because of the water tower. If your Legacy site could not support the RRUs up by the panels, it would look something like this:

 

rwk8.jpg

 

IMAG0091.jpg?w=AABa5hLm5m5XuexhIdB2-BA6W

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the very helpful explaination! I'm familiar with the GMO/ Ground Mount RRU(Full Build) scenarios. Unfortunately,  I cannot see anything other than an old Nextel Radio hut on the ground. (Old Nextel Site as well) This is a pic of the tower.

 

 

RcGN8mB.jpg

 

This is an older picture, no change since this. I stopped by the base but could only see the one hut. The way this tower is positioned, the radio structures are hidden away...

 

I'm more curious about the SID/NID, because I keep hearing about how Legacy/NV Id's are different, but wonder if they're the same in an incumbent market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the very helpful explaination! I'm familiar with the GMO/ Ground Mount RRU(Full Build) scenarios. Unfortunately,  I cannot see anything other than an old Nextel Radio hut on the ground. (Old Nextel Site as well) This is a pic of the tower.

 

 

 

 

This is an older picture, no change since this. I stopped by the base but could only see the one hut. The way this tower is positioned, the radio structures are hidden away...

 

I'm more curious about the SID/NID, because I keep hearing about how Legacy/NV Id's are different, but wonder if they're the same in an incumbent market.

 

I don't see any NV equipment up there. Judging by the tower, there should be no issue making it a full build. Without seeing the base station, I would guess that this is still fully legacy. 

 

As far as the SID/NID stuff, last year Sprint consolidated the whole Missouri market into a new NID, all at once. Legacy sites included. So those don't really indicate much for an Ericsson market. Samsung markets seem to only change when a site gets NV equipment, but you're not Samsung :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Posted ImagePosted Image

The first photo is a site that has been there since about the fall. It's very low to the ground, around 30 feet like the one in photo #2. They are side by side but the one in photo #2 was just constructed about a week ago, they were hooking up the fiber when I took the photo today. I'm positive that the 2nd photo is Sprint (nTelos in this case) but the 1st has always confused me as to what it is. Anyone able to tell from the photograph?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first photo is a site that has been there since about the fall. It's very low to the ground, around 30 feet like the one in photo #2. They are side by side but the one in photo #2 was just constructed about a week ago, they were hooking up the fiber when I took the photo today. I'm positive that the 2nd photo is Sprint (nTelos in this case) but the 1st has always confused me as to what it is. Anyone able to tell from the photograph?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The top one kind of looks like some Nextel iDEN panels I saw that were installed very late in life as replacements or at new sites. Like post 2008. Do you see these often?

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The top one kind of looks like some Nextel iDEN panels I saw that were installed very late in life as replacements or at new sites. Like post 2008. Do you see these often?

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

There is one other place I've seen thin panels like that. But they're 2 panels side by side not single ones. It's about the same height too. That site has confused me as well.

The place where that photo was taken was a place where a year ago there was nothing. They were first put on an old telephone pole around fall, then transferred onto a "mini" tower as a permanent place shortly after.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The top one kind of looks like some Nextel iDEN panels I saw that were installed very late in life as replacements or at new sites. Like post 2008. Do you see these often?

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Also looks a lot like what Sprint used to use (still does on some GMOs) in a few places near me.  Two ports at the bottom of a narrow, shallow unit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...