Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy S4T L720T [Trimode] User Discussion Thread


lilotimz

Recommended Posts

Wow, kinda surprising that they have both band 26 and 41 in enabled from the beginning.

 

Yeah, but that was standard two months ago with the immediate update for the Galaxy Mega and Galaxy S4 Mini, was it not?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Curious of what SignalCheck shows when on LTE if it allows the PCI and GCI to be snagged.

 

Can be done if only I can figure a way to force LTE. 

 

Oh and guys. The nexus 5 have not been dethroned!

 

ne7ydy3a.jpgajataqa9.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DigiClaws

Discuss Discuss! 

 

-Edit- Firmware looks appears to be more up to date than the single band GS4

 

 

 

 

 

Where do you go to get to that last screenshot? Is that screen only for tri-band phones or can I get to it from my S4?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Where do you go to get to that last screenshot? Is that screen only for tri-band phones or can I get to it from my S4?

 

 

Triband only. 

 

-- Look at what my phone attempted to connect to!...

 

veve2eha.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Triband only.    -- Look at what my phone attempted to connect to!...

Is the -140RSRP Right ? OR does it show that when trying to connect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the -140RSRP Right ? OR does it show that when trying to connect?

 

Tried to connect and got booted off due to eCSFB. Values are null but correct. 

 

Also 3G icon is changed..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tried to connect and got booted off due to eCSFB. Values are null but correct. 

 

Also 3G icon is changed..

Ah, So band 41 RSRP values will be higher(lower) than traditional values?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Curious of what SignalCheck shows when on LTE if it allows the PCI and GCI to be snagged.

 

Unfortunately it doesn't seem so...

 

plKSmNQ.png?1

 

 

Ah, So band 41 RSRP values will be higher(lower) than traditional values?

 

yeah... about that...

 

7kcI2pl.png?1

 

ZAZ58IT.png?1

 

In comparison on the same spot for my B25 Nexus 5...

 

aE0ZE9r.png?1

 

boBpQgj.png?1

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are Band 41 results so low? it can't possibly be loaded.

Backhauls not upgraded. Seems to top out at about 20 mbps for this one. I know of several other ones in my area that I'll test out later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

re: exterior box photos

 

I see the LTE B26 frequency added, I don't see any explicit mention of Spark or the 720T part number anywhere.  Were there any other hints on the the box or is the Band26 / three LTE frequencies listed the only way to tell from the outside of the box?

 

I suppose it was on the end labels or something.

 

Mine should deliver Monday.  It has tracked into the Kentucky hub with UPS tonight.  2 days via ground from there.

 

Have you gathered any information useful to update the entry on PDADB?

http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=5202&c=samsung_sph-l720t_galaxy_s4_td-lte_samsung_altius

Link to comment
Share on other sites

re: exterior box photos

 

I see the LTE B26 frequency added, I don't see any explicit mention of Spark or the 720T part number anywhere. Were there any other hints on the the box or is the Band26 / three LTE frequencies listed the only way to tell from the outside of the box?

 

I suppose it was on the end labels or something.

 

Mine should deliver Monday. It has tracked into the Kentucky hub with UPS tonight. 2 days via ground from there.

 

Have you gathered any information useful to update the entry on PDADB?

http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=5202&c=samsung_sph-l720t_galaxy_s4_td-lte_samsung_altius

Looks correct. ede7eny4.jpg

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

Edit: 

 

iU00Oj3.png?1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are Band 41 results so low? it can't possibly be loaded.

  

Backhauls not upgraded. Seems to top out at about 20 mbps for this one. I know of several other ones in my area that I'll test out later.

 

It is the WiMAX "bandwithhog."

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...