Jump to content

Sprint Launching New LTE Cities Oct. 29


Recommended Posts

We have the launch list! About 55 new cities to be officially launched with LTE this week.

  • Albuquerque (New Mexico Market)
    • Clovis, NM
  • Arkansas
    • Fort Smith, AR
  • Baltimore
    • Columbia, MD
    • Ellicott City, MD
  • Boston (Massachusetts)
    • Martha's Vineyard, MA
  • DFW
    • Athens, TX
  • East Kentucky
    • Lexington, KY
    • Fankfort, KY
  • East Michigan
    • Adrian, MI
  • East Texas
    • Jacksonville, TX
    • Paris, TX
    • Tyler, TX
    • Texarkana, TX
    • Texarkana, AR
  • Georgia
    • Auburn, AL
    • Opelika, AL
    • Milledgeville, GA
    • Warner Robin, GA
    • Waycross, GA
  • Gulf Coast
    • Pensacola, FL
  • Inland Northwest
    • Spokane, WA
    • Coeur d'Alene, ID
  • Louisiana
    • Fort Polk South, LA
    • Lafayette, LA
  • Milwaukee
    • Janesville, WI
  • Mississippi
    • Laurel, MS
    • Picayune, MS
  • Missouri
    • Farmington, MO
    • Jefferson City, MO
    • Kirksville, MO
    • Rolla, MO
  • North Wisconsin
    • Stevens Point, WI
  • New York City
    • Manhattan, NY
    • Queens, NY
    • Staten Island, NY
  • Oklahoma
    • Ardmore, OK
  • Orange County
    • Santa Ana, CA
    • Anaheim, CA
  • Oregon/SW Washington
    • Albany, OR
    • Corvallis, OR
  • Orlando
    • Lakeland, FL
    • Winter Haven, FL
  • South Carolina
    • Greenville, SC
    • Mauldin, SC
    • Easley, SC
    • Greenwood, SC
  • South Texas
    • Eagle Pass, TX
  • South West Florida
    • Cape Coral, FL
    • Fort Myers, FL
    • Naples, FL
  • Southern Connecticut
    • New Haven, CT
  • The Panhandle
    • Tallahasse, FL
    • Valdosta, GA
  • Upper Central Valley
    • Reb Bluff, CA
  • West Kentucky
    • Elizabethtown, KY
  • West Texas
    • Abilene, TX
    • Odessa, TX
  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is wrong with Janesville?

 

Jim, Sent from my Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

 

 

He was just hoping for some place semi-cool, like Madison.

 

:P

 

Well, the land of Paul Ryan has been coated in LTE goodness for a while already.  I was hoping for some new insight in the state.....like perhaps Madison as mentioned, mainly because we have all our towers (except 3) in progress, but only 3-4 accepted.  Nothing against Janesville in particular. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the land of Paul Ryan has been coated in LTE goodness for a while already. I was hoping for some new insight in the state.....like perhaps Madison as mentioned, mainly because we have all our towers (except 3) in progress, but only 3-4 accepted. Nothing against Janesville in particular. :)

Well then come on sprint ... winter is coming, lets get Madison some love already!

 

Jim, Sent from my Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the land of Paul Ryan has been coated in LTE goodness for a while already.  I was hoping for some new insight in the state.....like perhaps Madison as mentioned, mainly because we have all our towers (except 3) in progress, but only 3-4 accepted.  Nothing against Janesville in particular. :)

 

Until those in-progress sites are accepted, there won't be a launch. But it should happen pretty quickly once acceptances start since all the equipment is already installed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We have the launch list! About 55 new cities to be officially launched with LTE this week.

 

-snip-

 

Are these confirmed launched cities? Or are the still best guesses from members?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until those in-progress sites are accepted, there won't be a launch. But it should happen pretty quickly once acceptances start since all the equipment is already installed!

 

I was hoping in my heart of hearts that you were holding information for tonight's acceptance reports that would light my entire world up, alas, that was a long shot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Launched, and fully functional are two different things.  When an area gets to 40% of sites active, then it is launched.  

 

As has been shown by a few markets; like Orlando this 40% is not always correct. Orlando is currently at 54% LTE and 60% NV but the market as a whole has not launched, just a few cities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So NYC is fully launched now.

 

As long as LTE is fully functional in my area when I upgrade, I'll be satisfied, finally.

 

As stated above, this doesn't mean the network is completed. There are still A LOT of sites to go in the NYC market. They are barely to the half-way point. Especially lower Manhattan is lacking in LTE coverage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has been shown by a few markets; like Orlando this 40% is not always correct. Orlando is currently at 54% LTE and 60% NV but the market as a whole has not launched, just a few cities.

 

They haven't fully launched a market anywhere. They are launching cities as they pass that 40% POPs coverage. (Not 40% site completion). Depending on the design of the network, it's possible to have more than half of the sites complete, but not reach the 40% pops coverage threshold. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has been shown by a few markets; like Orlando this 40% is not always correct. Orlando is currently at 54% LTE and 60% NV but the market as a whole has not launched, just a few cities.

Given it's namesake, the Orlando market will not launch until there is fair coverage around the city. Which is still not imminent. 95% of the sites in the market to date have been outside the city proper. A fact you guys down there experience often, no doubt. :(

 

It looks like the Urban Orlando deployment is starting to get legs now though.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Janesville??? really????  aw man, total fail. 

 

They have been announcing all kinds of small markets in Wisconsin (Wausau, Fond du Lac, etc.) while actively working on the big markets (Milwaukee, Madison, Kenosha, Racine).  I don't think they announce a city/market until every site has every NV option operating and approved.

 

Lately, when driving around I can't find ANY site in Racine County (just south of Milwaukee) or sites in the southern part of Milwaukee County that don't have the new Samsung equipment installed.  SInce I don't have a 4g phone, I can't tell how many of them are transmitting 4g but I bet a bunch are!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have been announcing all kinds of small markets in Wisconsin (Wausau, Fond du Lac, etc.) while actively working on the big markets (Milwaukee, Madison, Kenosha, Racine).  I don't think they announce a city/market until every site has every NV option operating and approved.

 

They announce when coverage reaches about 40% of the population.

 

Lately, when driving around I can't find ANY site in Racine County (just south of Milwaukee) or sites in the southern part of Milwaukee County that don't have the new Samsung equipment installed.  SInce I don't have a 4g phone, I can't tell how many of them are transmitting 4g but I bet a bunch are!

 

Samsung has basically put a freeze on acceptances and integrations, and put all efforts into installing equipment. They are pushing to get as much done before winter as possible. Once done, they will go back and start firing up LTE. Most of the sites you see probably aren't broadcasting LTE yet, much like Madison. If you want to catalog which sites have equipment installed and report them to the In-Progress thread, we can get them marked on the maps. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Samsung has basically put a freeze on acceptances and integrations, and put all efforts into installing equipment. They are pushing to get as much done before winter as possible. Once done, they will go back and start firing up LTE. Most of the sites you see probably aren't broadcasting LTE yet, much like Madison. 

 

Ah, that makes sense.  So the tower crews are out there doing the tower-top work and installing the new equipment cabinets but aren't adding 4g (or any new features) to the site.

 

On many of the sites I've looked at, the legacy panels are gone so the new Samsung equipment (and antennas) must be on the air transmitting the same formats that the legacy equipment did, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, that makes sense.  So the tower crews are out there doing the tower-top work and installing the new equipment cabinets but aren't adding 4g (or any new features) to the site.

 

On many of the sites I've looked at, the legacy panels are gone so the new Samsung equipment (and antennas) must be on the air transmitting the same formats that the legacy equipment did, correct?

 

If the legacy antennas have in fact been removed, than the 3G side of things must have been hooked up. When they'll go back for the LTE side of things is unclear at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So are you saying, once winter really hits, no one will be climbing towers? Or they're just trying to get as much of that part done as possible before winter?

 

They're trying to get as much of that done before winter. Work certainly continues during winter, we saw it last year, it will happen this year. They just want to get as much of the tower climbing out of the way as they can!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're trying to get as much of that done before winter. Work certainly continues during winter, we saw it last year, it will happen this year. They just want to get as much of the tower climbing out of the way as they can!

So, you're saying that in a couple months, they could fire up LTE on a whole bunch of sites?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, you're saying that in a couple months, they could fire up LTE on a whole bunch of sites?

 

That's my understanding. Whether that happens or not remains to be seen. We're seeing the same things happening in Lincoln and Omaha as we are in Madison and Milwaukee. Tons of sites installed, but very few - to no - acceptance reports. Really, most Samsung markets (northern California, Colorado, Idaho, Nebraska, Iowa, Wisconsin.. etc)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...