Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Central Illinois Market (Peoria, Springfield, Quincy, Bloomington/Normal, Terre Haute)


DaQue

Recommended Posts

I drove last night and found the lincoln and 74 tower to using 4G.  It covers most of CU North of university fairly well.   It goes further south of not blocked by trees or buildings.   Found a strong hot spot by Timpone's restaurant. (reflection off the chemistry lab?). 

 

Today drove the west side and found the west Springfield tower using 4G.  It covers everything West of prospect well (again it may be blocked by buildings etc...)   in the open areas it works down to Curtis road.   

 

The tower on Mattis (near Curtis) was not using 4G yet.   All of this is mapped on Sensorly. (may take 24 hours to show up). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems they may have turned on LTE throughout most of the twin Cities. 'Bout time Sprint!!!!!

Sprint has had the equipment in place for a long time. The internet providers have been screwing Sprint over by not delivering fiber on time. Not much Sprint can do about it.

 

So, it's not "'Bout time Sprint"

 

It's, "'Bout time CenturyLink!"

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has had the equipment in place for a long time. The internet providers have been screwing Sprint over by not delivering fiber on time. Not much Sprint can do about it.

 

So, it's not "'Bout time Sprint"

 

It's, "'Bout time CenturyLink!"

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

I'm not sure where all this CenturyLink backhaul is. Their native footprint is very small in this market. I know that's what the docs say, but consider me skeptical.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the sprint tower upgrade map the following towers in Champaign now have 4g (or will soon) 

 

These are confirmed by Sensorly data... 

West Bradley 

North Lincoln

NE of Bradley and Mattis 

West Springfield 

 

Likely but not confirmed on Sensorly 

East University Ave

Philo road

 

Not yet functional (as of 9-22)

Downtown Champaign 

Campus

South Neil 

South Mattis 

 

Does anyone have news? 

Edited by Phil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Downtown tower looks hooked up and work is completed. Still haven't gotten a better signal though like I should. Campus still looks like it's fiber is done. But throughout downtown and campus I'm on the edge of band 26. I almost never see band 25 anywhere. No sight of band 41 at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess that's why I'm always on 26 lol. Last night at a friend house by Bradley and Duncan I disabled band 26 picked up band 25. Did a speed test on both and found band 26 to be over 12mbps down versus band 25 9mbps just wish downtown would get done I pull 2mbps at best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For some reason, I want to say 25 is useda bit more or perhaps there are propagation issues since I'll often hit under 10 and often 3P-4 on the downlink. I'm considering jumping to a Spark phone once all towers are up. Latency has been low though - so, no issues there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For some reason, I want to say 25 is useda bit more or perhaps there are propagation issues since I'll often hit under 10 and often 3P-4 on the downlink. I'm considering jumping to a Spark phone once all towers are up. Latency has been low though - so, no issues there.

Don't get the galaxy s5 I'm on my third one and still having problems
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For some reason, I want to say 25 is useda bit more or perhaps there are propagation issues since I'll often hit under 10 and often 3P-4 on the downlink. I'm considering jumping to a Spark phone once all towers are up. Latency has been low though - so, no issues there.

 

Band 25 has more users currently, so speeds are often going to be slower than B26.

 

Don't get the galaxy s5 I'm on my third one and still having problems

 

Get a G3! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The G3 is good you say? I know the G2 has worked well for my sister and her fiance.

 

 

The G3 is very good. Several steps above the G2. I would be using it as my daily driver, but I temporarily switched back to my N5 for network monitoring since it is rooted and my G3 is not (don't feel like rooting right now).

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/6006-lg-g3/page-54?p=367022&do=findComment&comment=367022

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Probably a lot of Midwest towers. Slight bias since Nebraska is a weird market, but there are tons of USCC sites that T-Mobile isn't yet co-located on. Think a similar situation in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Missouri. But some other markets, like yours, probably don't have that issue!
    • Sticky Customers - YES, and leave them flip to the T-Mobile PLMN when needed and they will be even more likely to Stick.
    • It seems to me that if the goal is to improve rural, the US Cellular buy-out would get them only part of the way there, considering there are plenty of rural areas that US Cellular does not serve.  But I also have a hard time reading it the way I think that article is, that the cost of this deal comes straight out of the $9 billion.  I mean, they're getting spectrum for their existing operations in US Cellular markets, including places that I wouldn't call rural.  (Roanoke, VA is the 9th largest city in the state, for example.)  It seems like some of it should be allocated to rural expansion, but certainly not the whole purchase price. There's also something to be said for getting the customer base of potentially sticky customers who have been used to US Cellular being the only game in town for potentially decades. - Trip
    • T-Mobile has stated 15% of their sites don't have 5g triband. In WV I know WISPs had a lot of 2.5GHz, but T-Mobile was trying to buy as much as possible. More rural FWA would be a big selling point that might overcome any soft bandwidth cap slight overages. Especially since UScellular likely started offering it on c-band.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...