Jump to content

Samsung to sell S4 LTE-Advanced phone starting this month


kckid

Recommended Posts

Some interesting tidbit I've found..

 

http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-samsung-galaxy-s-4-ltea-carriers-decline-20130626,0,5062851.story?track=rss

 

 

 

Samsung announced a new, ultra-fast version of its Galaxy S 4 flagship smartphone Wednesday, but there's a problem -- no major U.S. carrier is able to support the device's top speed at this point.

The Galaxy S 4 LTE-A is built to run on next-generation mobile networks known as LTE-Advanced. That technology is seen as the next step in the way users connect to the Internet through their carriers, following up on 3G, 4G and then 4G LTE networks over the last few of years.

“The introduction of the Galaxy S 4 LTE-A demonstrates Samsung’s desire and ability to provide consumers with technological innovations that take advantage of increased network speeds to deliver richer and fuller experiences," Samsung co-Chief Executive J.K. Shin said in a statement.

The tech giant says the GS4 LTE-A is the first commercial smartphone that can work with LTE-Advanced, and as such it can browse the Web, stream movies and download apps much faster than other devices.

Samsung says the GS4 LTE-A will launch later this summer in South Korea; the company did not say when it might come out in the U.S. That may be because currently, no major U.S. carrier has a full LTE-Advanced network.

Sprint says its network has some LTE-Advanced features already, and will add more over the summer. But its network is not officially LTE-Advanced and its LTE capabilities are available in only a handful of cities.

T-Mobile says it also plans to deploy LTE-Advanced features before the year's end.

Verizon and AT&T, meanwhile, have not made announcements regarding LTE-Advanced.

When asked about whether the carriers could support the new Samsung phone, AT&T and Verizon both declined to comment and T-Mobile did not respond.

Sprint said the phone would work on its network, but not at its top speeds. Sprint's LTE network is slower than the LTE-Advanced.

 

 

 

Specifically the bolded part. They did not outright reject talking about it nor saying it will not work which may be a hint that something is in the works...

 

discuss discuss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am betting that the first tri-band LTE compatible super phone will be the LG Optimus G2 with the S800 processor.  GS4 LTE Advanced won't make it over here.  We may see it in next year's GS5.  The only Samsung that will be compatible with tri-band LTE will be Note 3.

 

Those are my predictions.

 

Some interesting tidbit I've found..

 

http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-samsung-galaxy-s-4-ltea-carriers-decline-20130626,0,5062851.story?track=rss

 

 

 

Specifically the bolded part. They did not outright reject talking about it nor saying it will not work which may be a hint that something is in the works...

 

discuss discuss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gah, if that test video is for the current S4, I might just have to buy it on Sprint and forget about the S4 Active. I just want to be able to listen to it in the shower and not have to worry about water damage, that's all.

 

I'm starting to drool over the S4 now. Dangit, man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gah, if that test video is for the current S4, I might just have to buy it on Sprint and forget about the S4 Active. I just want to be able to listen to it in the shower and not have to worry about water damage, that's all.

 

I'm starting to drool over the S4 now. Dangit, man.

what vid.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The S4 durability test video on the first page.

 

Also, check this video out:

. It's hard to watch if you don't like seeing new technology get destroyed, but it's worth it.

I think why Samsung won the water test is because of the removable battery.   It lets the inside of the phone dry better.  Still who brings there phone near a toilet?   If I go to a beach phone stays in car!!  If im at a beach im usually in vacation rarely.  So I don't want to be bothered

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got 30 x 5 at home. America pays to much for things!!!!

You are wrong. Capitalism with its competition (*rolls eyes*) and its eye-gouging greed brings us the lowest price possible...

 

(I don't need the tag right?)

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...