Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - East Iowa Market (Quad Cities, Cedar Rapids, Iowa City, Dubuque, Waterloo/Cedar Falls)


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

They did leave us the lovely Nebraska loop though.

 

Yes, it is like the Great Wall of Nebraska -- it can be seen from space.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They did leave us the lovely Nebraska loop though.

 

Oh, and I prefer to call it the Fremont Loop or the Norfolk Loop.  But I have not decided which one.  So, I will just defer to you Knights of Ak-Sar-Ben.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So besides the second carrier, is there really anything else they can do to help the area? I wonder if there are plans for more densification here.

 

We aren't data hogs at all (family of 3 averaging 4 GB), but I prefer to have unlimited for the piece of mind and because we don't know what the future holds. And for that reason alone I would prefer to be with Sprint. I just want piece of mind that our area will be useable in the foreseeable future instead of being in a park in the middle of town and not able to pull up the weather map to see if a storm was coming our way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm going to be downtown Cedar Rapids at the Doubletree for a week in a hotel room and the convention center. Can anyone tell me what I can expect from Sprint service at that location?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be downtown Cedar Rapids at the Doubletree for a week in a hotel room and the convention center. Can anyone tell me what I can expect from Sprint service at that location?

 

This is a bogus post.  Nobody actually goes to a convention in Cedar Rapids.  Who are you really?  Ed Helms?  John C. Reilly?  Anne Heche?

 

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since no one appears to have any Sprint experience here I can tell you that in the convention center and arena it is a rough go for a Sprint customer. Battery life is about 4 hours on the Galaxy S6 and HTC M9 because the signal strength is so low indoors. Outside the signal is usable on LTE but speed is about 1 MB/sec. I'm having to run my phone on wifi calling from my Verizon mifi to use it for a whole day inside the convention center. Wifi is $10/day per device.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seen this on Sprint's fourms.

 

https://community.sprint.com/baw/thread/210207

 

Any in put?

 

Thanks,

 

John

We've said it repeatedly already.

 

Quad cities and east Iowa will not get 2.5 deployments at this time . Speed connect, a local lte over the air home isp, owns and utilizes all the available 2.5/2.6 brs/ebs spectrum minus 6 mhz that's owned by sprint.

 

Unless sprint can get a deal with them for spectrum leasing then the only hope is to refarm a second pcs Lte carrier.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've said it repeatedly already.

 

Quad cities and east Iowa will not get 2.5 deployments at this time . Speed connect, a local lte over the air home isp, owns and utilizes all the available 2.5/2.6 brs/ebs spectrum minus 6 mhz that's owned by sprint.

 

Unless sprint can get a deal with them for spectrum leasing then the only hope is to refarm a second pcs Lte carrier.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

I get that. I looks like one of the towers was upgraded to 2.5.  Plus why would they install Ethernet for BackHaul? 

 

The closest tower (.2 miles away) is near West 13th Street. This tower shows the following:

4G 2500 MHz:

Completed (11/13/2014)

4G 1900 MHz:

Completed (7/22/2014)

4G 800 MHz:

Completed (9/14/2014)

3G 1900 MHz:

Completed (5/18/2012)

Voice / 1xRTT 800 MHz:

Completed (10/3/2013)

Backhaul:

Ethernet

Please keep in mind when viewing the "completed" date, you will need to add an additional 30 days for the optimization period.

There is another tower close by near East 21st Street that is .5 miles away. This tower shows the following:

4G 2500 MHz:

TBD

4G 1900 MHz:

Completed (8/9/2013)

4G 800 MHz:

Not Scheduled

3G 1900 MHz:

Completed (10/23/2012)

Voice / 1xRTT 800 MHz:

Completed (2/8/2014)

Backhaul:

Ethernet

 

Thanks,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get that. I looks like one of the towers was upgraded to 2.5.  Plus why would they install Ethernet for BackHaul? 

 

The closest tower (.2 miles away) is near West 13th Street. This tower shows the following:

4G 2500 MHz:

Completed (11/13/2014)

4G 1900 MHz:

Completed (7/22/2014)

4G 800 MHz:

Completed (9/14/2014)

3G 1900 MHz:

Completed (5/18/2012)

Voice / 1xRTT 800 MHz:

Completed (10/3/2013)

Backhaul:

Ethernet

Please keep in mind when viewing the "completed" date, you will need to add an additional 30 days for the optimization period.

There is another tower close by near East 21st Street that is .5 miles away. This tower shows the following:

4G 2500 MHz:

TBD

4G 1900 MHz:

Completed (8/9/2013)

4G 800 MHz:

Not Scheduled

3G 1900 MHz:

Completed (10/23/2012)

Voice / 1xRTT 800 MHz:

Completed (2/8/2014)

Backhaul:

Ethernet

 

Thanks,

John

 

How'd you get this information?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get that. I looks like one of the towers was upgraded to 2.5. Plus why would they install Ethernet for BackHaul?

 

The closest tower (.2 miles away) is near West 13th Street. This tower shows the following: 4G 2500 MHz:

Completed (11/13/2014) 4G 1900 MHz:

Completed (7/22/2014) 4G 800 MHz:

Completed (9/14/2014) 3G 1900 MHz:

Completed (5/18/2012) Voice / 1xRTT 800 MHz:

Completed (10/3/2013) Backhaul:

Ethernet

Please keep in mind when viewing the "completed" date, you will need to add an additional 30 days for the optimization period.

There is another tower close by near East 21st Street that is .5 miles away. This tower shows the following: 4G 2500 MHz:

TBD 4G 1900 MHz:

Completed (8/9/2013) 4G 800 MHz:

Not Scheduled 3G 1900 MHz:

Completed (10/23/2012) Voice / 1xRTT 800 MHz:

Completed (2/8/2014) Backhaul:

Ethernet

 

Thanks,

John

Sprints internal tools have been wrong before so it would not surprise me but someone can go check to confirm.

 

Also ether net can represent anything but typically ethernet represents fiber or aav.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Quad Cities is a mobile hell hole:

 

Sprint is there with no EBS/BRS. T-Mobile isn't there; iWireless (50% T-Mobile owned) is and HSPA+ only.

 

Verizon and AT&T are there but I'm not sure about their spectrum position. USCellular is there and that's the wild card, but I have no clue how their LTE networks would perform.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Quad Cities is a mobile hell hole:

 

Sprint is there with no EBS/BRS. T-Mobile isn't there; iWireless (50% T-Mobile owned) is and HSPA+ only.

 

Verizon and AT&T are there but I'm not sure about their spectrum position. USCellular is there and that's the wild card, but I have no clue how their LTE networks would perform.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ha ha. Yes it is. I think VzW and AT&T work fine here, but the others, not so much. That is surprising since we do have a pretty big population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I missing something?  I found complete Sprint BRS licenses for Cedar Rapids, Quad Cities, Waterloo/Cedar Falls and Dubuque looking just now on the FCC ULS.  Unless I'm reading it wrong, it is showing all the BRS blocks for all four markets.  However, SpeedConnect does control BRS in Iowa City.  

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=3195993

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=3195991

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=3196021

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=2589843

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I missing something?  I found complete Sprint BRS licenses for Cedar Rapids, Quad Cities, Waterloo/Cedar Falls and Dubuque...

 

Dubuque, Dubuque, da da da da da da...

Dubuque, Dubuque, da da da da da da...

Dubuque, Dubuque, da da da da da da…Dubuque

 

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I missing something?  I found complete Sprint BRS licenses for Cedar Rapids, Quad Cities, Waterloo/Cedar Falls and Dubuque looking just now on the FCC ULS.  Unless I'm reading it wrong, it is showing all the BRS blocks for all four markets.  However, SpeedConnect does control BRS in Iowa City.  

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=3195993

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=3195991

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=3196021

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=2589843

Try searching it on the dashboard and see what you get. For example your first link is for WQLW474. Using the dashboard to search Scott County Iowa and BRS pulls up WQLW474, but it shows they only 6 MHz in Scott County on that license. It is like your links are showing the entire BRS spectrum and not what Sprint actually has. SpeedConnect literally has most of the BRS on the dashboard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try searching it on the dashboard and see what you get.

I did.

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/searchMarket.jsp

 

Used this link, like I always do. Changed Market Type to BTA. Changed Radio Service Code to BRS. Used market codes for Iowa City, Quad Cities, Cedar Rapids, Waterloo/Cedar Falls and Dubuque.

 

In all those, SpeedConnect is shown to only be licensed with BRS in Iowa City only. No SpeedConnect BRS licenses in the others at all. Only Sprint shown as a BRS license holder in all the rest.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did.

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/searchMarket.jsp

 

Used this link, like I always do. Changed Market Type to BTA. Changed Radio Service Code to BRS. Used market codes for Iowa City, Quad Cities, Cedar Rapids, Waterloo/Cedar Falls and Dubuque.

 

In all those, SpeedConnect is shown to only be licensed with BRS in Iowa City only. No SpeedConnect BRS licenses in the others at all. Only Sprint shown as a BRS license holder in all the rest.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

See the edited post that I added to while you were typing. We'll get this figured out. I still don't think your 4 links tell us what Sprint actually has. It is like they're simply showing the BRS spectrum range. If you start from here http://reboot.fcc.gov/spectrumdashboard/systemInfo.seam?conversationId=934 and browse using the map for Iowa---> Scott County---> BRS see what you get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try searching it on the dashboard and see what you get. For example your first link is for WQLW474. Using the dashboard to search Scott County Iowa and BRS pulls up WQLW474, but it shows they 6 MHz in Scott County on that license. It is like your links are showing the entire BRS spectrum and not what Sprint actually has. SpeedConnect literally has most of the BRS on the dashboard.

 

I am not trying to disparage anyone -- just being honest.  But the Spectrum Dashboard is kindergarten stuff.  And it is crap.

 

As someone who has cataloged and mapped spectrum for the last 12 years, the FCC ULS tells the true tale.  The FCC ULS is the only worthwhile source.  With the FCC ULS, you drink straight from the bottle.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

See the edited post that I added to while you were typing. We'll get this figured out. I still don't think your 4 links tell us what Sprint actually has. It is like they're simply showing the BRS spectrum range. If you start from here http://reboot.fcc.gov/spectrumdashboard/systemInfo.seam?conversationId=934 and browse using the map for Iowa---> Scott County---> BRS see what you get.

I get what your saying. But in a place where two license holders exist in a BTA, both licenses will be shown in the ULS. Sometimes there's even a half dozen license holders. Like what has happened in the Iowa City BTA. There's many shown. But in Quad Cities, Cedar Rapids, Waterloo/Cedar Falls and Dubuque, a license sweep of all of BRS only shows Sprint in the ULS. The ULS will show if part of the license has been disaggregated, and none are shown for these licenses. Sprint's licenses in East Iowa are whole.

 

I wonder if SpeedConnect has some weird single broadcast location licenses in BRS. Or possibly some geographic leases that are not market wide. It's bizarre.

 

I have been looking at BRS licenses a long time, and if you can't count these as being all Sprint, then you can't count on anything else you read in the FCC ULS. Because where Sprint does have all the BRS spectrum in a market, the license looks exactly the same as these in the ULS.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on my review, I wouldn't rule out Sprint B41 in East Iowa market, except for Iowa City. Unless Sprint has EBS there. I did not check that.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on my review, I wouldn't rule out Sprint B41 in East Iowa market, except for Iowa City. Unless Sprint has EBS there. I did not check that.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

All owned by speed connect.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...