Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - East Iowa Market (Quad Cities, Cedar Rapids, Iowa City, Dubuque, Waterloo/Cedar Falls)


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

I am in Cedar Rapids. Just switched back to Sprint via MVNO (Ting). Should I be seeing 4g LTE now? I have a Samsung Galaxy Nexus LTE. I see CDMA - eHRPD under status. My wife was on stock rom and had 4g. Now I am on custom rom and cannot get 4g and I should be. My PRL is 24016 and radio is GJ04. I am near Blairs Ferry road and C Avenue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are people's experiences on the CR tower at Lindale Mall? I've got a strong LTE signal but no usable data. Had to switch to 3G to use the phone. Just visiting for the holidays so just curious if this tower is complete or in progress?

It was providing good LTE up until week before Thanksgiving. I too had great signal strength but no data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this mean that all 3G sites should now be LTE now?  

No. It just means the new equipment is installed and voice and 3G has shifted to the new equipment. Thus there are no more "legacy" or "old" sites in East Iowa right now. LTE activation is separate, but the equipment is there no on every site. Fiber backhaul and acceptance by Sprint are still needed on many of the East Iowa sites before LTE begins broadcasting. Maps of where sites sit progress wise in East Iowa are available to sponsors of the site in my signature line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was providing good LTE up until week before Thanksgiving. I too had great signal strength but no data.

$G LTE is back on for this tower, drove by last night and was pulling 20M down, 7M up.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive the noob-ism, but does "fiber capped" on such-and-such a day mean that tower has backhaul and is LTE ready? Or does that mean something else?

 

On another note, Mediacom has been going offline between midnight and 6AM for the past few days. Maybe they're running new fiber?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On another note, Mediacom has been going offline between midnight and 6AM for the past few days. Maybe they're running new fiber?

I'd prefer to discuss items pertaining to the spreadsheet and other perks of being a sponsor in the sponsor thread.- Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Self-censored accordingly. My apologies for the infraction.

No worries there was no infraction there all as far as I'm concerned. We've just put a lot of effort into those maps and spreadsheets to help us and ultimately the site as well out. I'd prefer people (like you did) support the site and as a perk of that you get access to the detailed information we have there.

 

I responded to you on the sponsor side. :tu:

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4711-nebraska-iowa-market-spreadsheets-and-maps/?p=248679

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dkoellerwx expects the Quad Cities and Cedar Rapids to be officially "launched" as LTE markets by Sprint imminently based on Sprint updating coverage maps (which they tend to do before launching a market).

 

Keep in mind this is largely a marketing decision as there are still sites that will get LTE in both the Quad Cities and Cedar Rapids that don't have it yet (where those sites are located is available to site sponsors by clicking the link in my signature).

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/5175-sprint-launching-new-lte-cities-december-2013/&do=findComment&comment=251609

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Had a sighting of 4G in Iowa City yesterday, but it was gone today. Hopefully means it is very close. East side, on HWY 6.

 

4giowacity.jpg

Become a sponsor and check out the sponsor threads and see a lot more info on our sites and great info from many other awesome people. Iowa City has had LTE for a couple weeks. Pretty cool! Hopefully more to come soon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Got this text yesterday from sprint! Any value in it?SprintFreeMsg: Over the next month the new network will be largely completed in your area making it better than ever! http://sprint.us/network1 Reply S to stop

Yes, the value is that you now owe me $3 for my time.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

First Band 26 sites accepted in the East Iowa market. Details in the Premier Sponsor B26/LTE 800 thread.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...