Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Delaware market (including Wilmington, Dover, Laurel and Elkton MD)


cjinohio03

Recommended Posts

Hey guys can someone give me an update on the tower on limestone road in Hockessin... My 4g goes in an out and I mostly get 3g in the house. I know the tower is literally .4 miles from me so I know I should be getting better signal then that. I also know the second tower from me is almost a mile away and im not sure if that's updated with NV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have information about Newark and the UD area getting upgraded to 4g LTE service?  We never got 4g Wimax here but have been hoping that LTE would come.

 

Short answer, yes Newark and the UD campus will get LTE.

 

Longer answer, ~38000 Sprint locations are going to receive Network Vision (NV) upgrades (many already have). There are multiple towers that serve the Newark and UD campus area. Currently 75% have had the NV equipment installed and accepted at the towers. The remaining may be in progress but until they are confirmed in an acceptance report or observed and reported by an individual on this form we can't say for sure. At this time there are 8 sites in Delaware that are broadcasting LTE. This has all occurred within the last month. You can see this if you look at the Sensorly map (and some of it is very close to Newark). Gut feeling, you will probably see LTE from at least one tower in the area in less than 90 days.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They both updated with 3g , but you get a signal from a pa tower close too border. You just gettting some weak siganls .

When I spoke with sprint rep they said the tower on limestone is done eitj upgrads for 4g so im confused because if it was and it was broadcasted, Ishould be seeing 4g eeverywhere in the house and not just in the backyard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Delaware,

 

Does anybody knows if there its going to be any update coming to the City of Wilmington soon??

 

No firm information as to exactly when. However several sites have the hardware installed in the city and are just waiting on backhaul to be completed. It is possible something might happen tomorrow... If I was a gambling man my money would say probably something within the next 90 days on band 25 (PCS).

 

Now if anyone has a tri-band hot spot (or the soon to arrive tri-band phones) they may find parts of Wilmington already have LTE on band 41.

:ninja:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...