Jump to content

T-Mobile to end smart phone subsidies next year


kckid

Recommended Posts

It does not end the required 2 year contract.

 

Thank you for that takeaway.. Therein lies the real issue. If you are paying full price and not seeing a reduction in your bill (although some carriers do) you are still locked into a contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll play devils advocate for this topic.

 

For value customers who want simple phones, or what we like to call, feature phones, this model works exceedingly well. Plus, T-Mo does offer great service for the value, if you are in a good coverage area. I use my family as an example. They do not upgrade devices every year/month/day/week/minute like us, and rarely travel outside the tri-state area. For them, T-Mo offers the cheapest calling plan for families, with the very limited usage they actually have.

 

T-Mo will always be a player in the market, just a smaller one, more niche then anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am really interested to see how T-Mobile Network Modernization works out especially with the iPhone running on T-Mobile 3G, HSPA+, and LTE. It will also be interesting to see how good is the voice quality if T-Mobile will offer Wi-Fi Calling on the iPhone. I remember when Sprint first released the iPhone that there were quite a bit of customers that experienced service problems with slow connections that made the data speeds unusable for some of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As has been said here, the contract requirement on the Value plans is a deal breaker. In fact, it kind of makes me mad...there is NO justification for requiring that you sign a contract with a $200 ETF if there's no device subsidy. I mean, of course they can require it if people will sign it, but nobody should. I realize Tmo would love to still have us locked in and have us pay for our phones ourselves, but I won't sign a contract without a subsidy. I'm fine going without a subsidy as long as the monthly rate is lower (which it is on tmo) and there's no contract.

 

I do realize they have their monthly 4G plans that don't require a contract. But those have some features removed -- data roaming and call forwarding (so no Google Voice voicemail) among them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am really interested to see how T-Mobile Network Modernization works out especially with the iPhone running on T-Mobile 3G, HSPA+, and LTE. It will also be interesting to see how good is the voice quality if T-Mobile will offer Wi-Fi Calling on the iPhone. I remember when Sprint first released the iPhone that there were quite a bit of customers that experienced service problems with slow connections that made the data speeds unusable for some of them.

 

I think one big SPrint iPhone issue was that they were funneling all iPhone traffic through one gateway in their core network. That got fixed.

 

As for WiFi calling, I don't expect that it will be available on the iPhone. Voice quality on T-Mobile is generally fine though, second only to Sprint from what I've seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Telefonica execs warn tmobile over getting rid of subsidy.

 

Take it from someone with experience. "It was a disaster," said Tracy Isacke, director of Telefonica Digital.

 

Earlier this year Telefonica and Vodafone both decided to get rid of subsidies in Spain. The customer hemorrhaging hasn't stopped. In September alone, Telefonicalost 253,520 mobile users. Vodafone has similarly been losing customers and in Julybrought back subsidies for what it said was a limited time.

 

If all operators in a market were to get rid of subsidies, the shift could work, said Omar Javaid, managing director of BBO Global and until a couple months ago a Motorola Mobility executive. But when one operator like T-Mobile makes such a dramatic change, it's an invitation for the competitors to actually increase their subsidies to try to win more customers. "If someone wants to drop subsidies, that's an opportunity [for the competition] to go for the jugular," he said.

 

http://www.citeworld...onica-exec-says

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Telefonica execs warn tmobile over getting rid of subsidy.

 

[/font][/color]

 

http://www.citeworld...onica-exec-says

 

I predict t-mobile will crash and burn with this idea. As the analyst notes, this could work if all of the operators decided to go this route in a similar time frame. I think it could also work if it was VZW that was trying it. T-mobile, on the other hand, doesn't have the network, scope or appeal to pull this off by themselves.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile is going about it in a less upfront way vs. Telefonica/Vodafone. TF/VF didn't have payment plans for their handsets, and they may not have even lowered monthly pricing. T-Mobile OTOH has payment plans such that, if you want to pay for a handset in installments, you'll be saving a little money in the long run, but will otherwise be getting bills close to what you'd pay otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I assume that any agreement is not perpetual and has an end date. - Trip
    • I think it is likely that T-Mobile will be forced to honor any existing US cellular roaming agreements in those areas as a condition of them taking over the spectrum.  In that case, there would be no improvement of service unless T-Mobile improves the service offering in those areas.
    • My understanding is the MNO carriers are the one who have objected to the use of cell phones in commercial planes.  I understand that it ties down too many cell phones at once, thus I can not see this changing. However this depends on how it is structured. Use of a different plmn for satellite service might make it possible for planes only to connect with satellite. Private pilots have been using cellphones in planes for many decades. Far fewer phones at a lower altitude.
    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...