Jump to content

Sensorly 4G LTE Coverage Comparisons


Recommended Posts

I thought it might be interesting to compare the Sensorly 4G LTE maps of Sprint, The Dark Side (AT&T), and Verizon.

 

Clearly, Sprint is behind The Dark Side, but only very slightly behind. Even Verizon, while it has very broad coverage, is rather spotty and incomplete.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Maps were collected at about 7:00 PM EST, Tuesday, November 20.)

 

(Also, we should probably note that Sprint LTE mappers are obsessed, and many are likely

to be deranged :jester: and may drive many, many miles trying to find that elusive LTE,

while Dark Side and Verizon mappers may be slightly more normal.)

 

(Thanks to Dkoellerwx for helping me show the full US map. Click on each image to see it in

a larger size.)

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To see the whole US, click the fullscreen button on the upper right side of the map :tu:

course, then you can't switch between providers

 

Not even if you pay the ETF :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

 

Yeah, they have to deal with data caps. Sprint users could care less.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

And they apparently haven't looked at the data usage. Very very little data is used.

 

Sent from a little old Note 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And they apparently haven't looked at the data usage. Very very little data is used.

 

Sent from a little old Note 2

 

 

Checked the data usage on my phone for sensorly last month. It had used 315mb of data, if you only get 2gb you might not want to use the program that much.

 

Sent from my EVO using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
    • T-Mobile and EQT Announce Joint Venture to Acquire Lumos and Build Out the Un-carrier’s First Fiber Footprint https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-eqt-jv-to-acquire-lumos
    • Unable to confirm if it's really off but I noticed this morning that I'm no longer connecting to Band 41 on my home site. Switching my phone to LTE-only pretty much always put me on Band 41 since it was the least used band on T-Mobile's network. Now I'm only able to connect to Band 2/66. Not complaining because it means speeds are faster on LTE and maybe 150MHz n41 is around the corner.
    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...