Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Tucson/Yuma Market


jasper7821

Recommended Posts

Very possible.

I called Sprint and reported the issue, they said that the tower next to my house is being worked on and will be down until the first week of June, when I asked why they said they are preparing it for LTE by merging CDMA tower and some other tower, they asked me to update my PRL so I can pick up other towers, not sure what that means!

Edited by htabbach
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 17 November 2011

 

 

 

I wonder if Sprint will have any major phone launches until next summer. Cuz would they release this Nexus with WiMax? That would be lame. It's fatally wounded and diying in the corner. Do they release it with 3G only? They would get laughed off the face of the earth. Samsung and Google probably wouldn't go for it, either. I think Sprint holds out and there is Galaxy Nexus release on the Now netowerk.

My area has been bad since Wednesday, the tower is completely off line. But that's a good sign. The legacy panels are gone and only the NV ones are up. I'm just hoping to catch an Ericson guy at some point to ask them about 800 band.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just hoping to catch an Ericson guy at some point to ask them about 800 band.

 

Note, they're not even installing 800 RRUs on these IBEZ towers yet, so be armed with some good questions ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Very possible.

 

 

I called Sprint and reported the issue, they said that the tower next to my house is being worked on and will be down until the first week of June, when I asked why they said they are preparing it for LTE by merging CDMA tower and some other tower, they asked me to update my PRL so I can pick up other towers, not sure what that means!

 

Updating PRL won't do that. That's the myth and poor training the CSRs receive.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note, they're not even installing 800 RRUs on these IBEZ towers yet, so be armed with some good questions ;)

 

 

maybe if I get to talk to them, they can shed some light. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay so I just did the ##update# and I noticed my PRL went from 51096 to 51097 on my iPhone 5. What does this mean?

Read up on what a PRL is and that should help answer your question. Here is an article on PRLs:

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-338-what-is-a-prl/

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha thanks ya'll, will do if im allowed ill put up all the info i can, itll ve exciting knowing what's happening as it's happening! I start june 1st so we shall see! Ill definetly shard the love

 

Retail peons are told nothing of value.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not sure on how long it will take for Sprints LTE to be live in Tucson. Many people said in this month of June but I doubt that :/

Deployment is already underway at approximately 12-18 sites around Tucson. And more are starting every week.

 

The first sites will start go live from these. Probably some time in June, but may push out into July. It will take many months to get complete coverage, but it's coming.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sounds great! Although what confuses me is on the Deployment List that you have running, Tucsons ' LTE accepted sites ' was at 0%. So im curious why.

Accepted means they are complete and Sprint has accepted them from the OEM. Sites that are under deployment now are not shown in accepted numbers. They will show as accepted as they start going live.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not happening! .-. It's like the time when I usually get the best speeds, I always have full bars but my speeds are malfunctioning or something.attachicon.gifImageUploadedByTapatalk1370596168.586425.jpg

 

I didn't work today, but I know on Wednesday there were 5 tickets open for Tucson proper (read: nothing outside of Tucson/immediate county, Oro Valley, Marana, and outlying areas are under different network ticket dropdowns I didn't look at) about tower issues. Some were Network Vision upgrade notifications, some were entire site outages, one was a data block issue if I remember correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I don't know if this means anything, but I ALWAYS have 5 bars in my room. Today I've been experiencing 3 bars most of the time & 1xRTT keeps switching between 3G back and forth on my iPhone 5. Before I always had 3G without ever going to 1xRTT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you rephrase please? What does this mean happened? :o

 

It just means that 5 towers were having issues in the immediately Tucson area. Oro Valley, Marana, Green Valley, Sahuarita, Catalina, etc. are all separate and not considered directly part of Tucson so they are split into a separate subsection on the Network Event Board for open network tickets, I didn't look at those the other day as I don't live there. hehe

 

Some were just notices of Network Vision upgrades that may take longer than a day (I've seen tickets have ETR dates anywhere from 2-30 days out).

 

Some were towers being completely down, voice, text, and data.

 

One was specifically about a, EVDO data blocking issue. So data sessions were being blocked on the network side for some reason, could have been capacity, a bottleneck in backhaul, etc. where the tower was actively denying connections due to some issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand how I can get slow speeds at this time..attachicon.gifImageUploadedByTapatalk1370694299.554118.jpg

 

It could mean alot of things, work could be underway so it might be connecting to a far tower. If there is one thing i have learned form here its that you need to be patient with these things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

work is definitely underway as everyone has said, being patient is the best policy, saying how poor the service is ect is obvious for users in this thread, but from what ive been seeing in my short tenure at sprint is the service is being upgraded as we speak, the tool shows us the towers and supposedly what is being done to said towers, netwok vision upgrades is what the system shows. 

 

itll be here soon just gota keep patient!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at a village inn close to middle of tucson and I got this a lot.ImageUploadedByTapatalk1370836762.144289.jpg

I had that for almost two weeks, but my service got better two days ago; and then boom, the tower close to my house was 3g accepted.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...