Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Orange County Market (Anaheim/Santa Ana/Irvine/Huntington Beach)


mbaseball3

Recommended Posts

 

Ha ha the map updates! I'm sure your busy. Just giving you a hard time.

 

I guess you haven't seen the 5 LTE sites added today in the OC.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must be looking at the wrong map, Can anybody give me a link to the same map that has 5 updates for OC area?

 

Go to the interactive map section of the sponsor's forum and look at the thread "NV sites complete"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm seeing a bit of LTE showing up in Westminster. Anyone think that's OC?

 

at the merging of 22 and 405 freeway? it has been there for couple of days. seems like is just a lingering off of 605 and 406 merging, i hope i am wrong :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

at the merging of 22 and 405 freeway? it has been there for couple of days. seems like is just a lingering off of 605 and 406 merging, i hope i am wrong :)

 

Looking at Sensorly, I can tell you this is almost certainly the case. It's much darker at the 405/605 interchange. Very faint at the 405/22.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Guys.. been a lurker for a long time. The past 3 weeks, i've been going crazy with Sprint in my area (Irvine, UCI area). I was getting dropped calls like crazy. Today, 4G LTE popped up and I couldn't be more excited. was getting close to 9250kbps on the DL and 2500kbps on the UL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Guys.. been a lurker for a long time. The past 3 weeks, i've been going crazy with Sprint in my area (Irvine, UCI area). I was getting dropped calls like crazy. Today, 4G LTE popped up and I couldn't be more excited. was getting close to 9250kbps on the DL and 2500kbps on the UL.

 

The UCI tower is live

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Guys.. been a lurker for a long time. The past 3 weeks, i've been going crazy with Sprint in my area (Irvine, UCI area). I was getting dropped calls like crazy. Today, 4G LTE popped up and I couldn't be more excited. was getting close to 9250kbps on the DL and 2500kbps on the UL.

Map it if you can!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

on* Also, a bit out of subject here but the Galaxy S4 will be announced on March 14 (My Birthday) I just got into a two year contract on Nov 2012 and I wanna give myself a late present. Is it possible for me to get an early upgrade per say switch my s3 for the S4 ?? (I don't mind paying extra)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure they will be off before 5. They are just testing and teasing. I give up following it until a tower just stays on.

My phone was stuck in a boot loop when I drove by that area on my trip home, so I'll assume by the lack of stuff on Sensorly that it was off. Not really surprised, but I still like to investigate. I'll report back after the morning commute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noticed Something interesting in all of my tests at 1 am to 1 30am, all the upload were capped at 20kb/s (prolly doesn't mean anything). I should mention that I was having no signal around 5pm few times in and out. Thought I share... (Westminster)

post-9982-13618708899054_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I finally experienced the whole no service no 3g inn n in out extended service last night. I'm surrounded by 3g NV completed towers so I'm gonna go on a limb and say that was a good sign!

 

Where was this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
    • Lots of time if you can get close to the pole, you will see a sticky label on the box that is low enough to read. Most of the time it warns of RF exposure but also it may have a toll free number to call if there is an issue. Sometimes there is a power company meter with the name of the user. I would be surprised if there was nothing there to help identify it.  Thinking further, if this is multi-Tenant oDAS, then maybe you might only see some name like Crown Castle or maybe even a department in the city government.   An app on your phone may show the carrier(s)
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...