Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - North Wisconsin Market (Wausau/Green Bay/Appleton)


n9ovreric

Recommended Posts

Sorry about the grainy pic, ill get a better one soon. Can anyone tell which on here is Sprint and if so are they doing the update on the Sprint panels? If you look close, there is two guys up there.IMAG0001.jpg

 

The bottom rack appears to be Samsung Sprint NV equipment.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bottom rack appears to be Samsung Sprint NV equipment.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Thanks, thats what i thought also, i'll get better pics of the equiptment in a little bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well went back to the site to take more pice, but my camera was dead. I can confirm though by the boxes on the ground this is NV equiptment. I also seen the new Samsung boxes on the ground. Looks like they are almost done with the panel install as i also seen new coax coming down the tower, just not to the boxes yet. The Samsung boxes are running though so i assume it will be live soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tazman

They are back working on the tower by HWY 29 and S. 72nd Avenue in Wausau.  I talked to the guys and they were install ing parts inside the building.  Looked like batteries or power supplies, they said that they were very heavy.

At least there is some movement but it is a very slow process, but at least some movement.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Milwaukee market is supposed to be 75% done by October. The rest of Wisconsin should be close to the same plan. That isn't for sure though.

That's great to hear! At this point, I'll be happy if Green Bay is 25% done by October. Haha!

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see they turned on the 3g here signal went up and data speeds on evdo are holding around 2meg down. I was watching the signal change. Must have been adjusting the down tilt. LTE signal went down then back up. In Wausau.

 

:D

 

sent from my galaxy note 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a Sensorly is showing a spot near Oneida on the map now.  This is great to see.  Hopefully this is one of many spots that will start to pop up soon.

I saw that too so that must mean the Oneida tower is broadcasting.  There is also a new 3G/4G complete tower in Seymour as of yesterday or today.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw that too so that must mean the Oneida tower is broadcasting.  There is also a new 3G/4G complete tower in Seymour as of yesterday or today.

 

Nice!  How did you get the info that there's a new tower?  Just wondering how I would go about finding this info for Green Bay and Appleton.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice!  How did you get the info that there's a new tower?  Just wondering how I would go about finding this info for Green Bay and Appleton.  :)

 

 

If you become a sponsor, you get access to the maps that show the completed sites.

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1195-information-about-s4gru-sponsorship-levels-and-how-to-become-a-sponsor/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you become a sponsor, you get access to the maps that show the completed sites.

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1195-information-about-s4gru-sponsorship-levels-and-how-to-become-a-sponsor/

 

Nice!  I was only able to afford a donation of $10 at this time, but I look forward to checking out these maps!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tazman

Guess I need to get a pay pal account so I can become a sponsor.

 

My wife was showing here coworker the LTE at work in downtown Wausau today, they were comparing the speed of Sprints LTE with CellCom's 3g.  CellCom always loaded the page faster, my wife has the iPhone5.  I told her that Sprint isn't complete with the LTE build out yet and it should get faster.(Hope I am right).

My coworker says that Sprints  LTE in Stevens Point is very fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can say that the LTE I have seen in Milwaukee and Sheboygan is pretty fast. I also saw extremely fast LTE in Grand Rapids, MI: 19.54 Mbps down and 4.99 Mbps up. I'm hoping we will see these speeds everywhere once NV is complete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I Just mapped that spot on sensorly. I was at the range and I looked at my phone and saw 4g I was excited tell I left the range and a mile down the road it was gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...