Jump to content

CLEAR Spot Voyager


danielholt

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

 

So I moved back to Wake Forest, NC (The Research Triangle as AJ would call it) last week from a work reassignment that had me in Athens, GA... as many know, I stumbled upon 1 of the first unblocked Sprint LTE signals in the U.S., see http://s4gru.com/ind...dpost__p__17219 for more on that, anyways... back to my review....

 

As many people in the area know, Sprint absolutely suck here in the Raleigh/Durham area... theres no sugar coating that.. I am a strong Sprint supporter, and have seen with my own eyes what will be done, but in the mean time, the area here gets a check mark next to "needs improvement". Regardless, the area will be much improved over the next year, and I look forward to the achievements that the LTE deployment team make.

 

So...my new job assignment puts me on the 2nd floor of a building where we are maybe 1/4th of a mile from a WiMAX tower, now... I love to play internet radio at my desk all day, and use facebook, and the various other things to keep me in communication with my wife and outside world, also youtube clips, and maybe some large email attachments here and there, I do not ever recommend doing these things with an office internet connection, I am an IT supervisor for a living, and we regularly monitor bandwidth trends and usage at end users desk... Reports get compiled, and forwarded on to managers, long story short, big brother is watching, don't jeopardize your job, its a big deal I guess for me as I work with the federal government, and DOD, little companies may not be so stringent, but someone, somewhere down the line might ask you why you are eating up so much bandwidth, its something I would just rather avoid.

 

This brings me to my bandaid fix... Now, being that our Sprint service is less than desirable at the moment, my wife and I have decided on Verizon for our phone carrier, we have a youngin at home, and communication for us is vital, I wont go on about Sprint & dropped calls cause I don't want to turn this into a rant, its not... This topic is meant to be about making it by with what you have, and being that Verizon are amazing at deploying LTE all over the united states, and we have amazing coverage in our area, the fact that we are capped at a certain data limit is very unattractive. So being the tech guru guy I am, I needed an unlimited solution for my desk at work.... I looked at clear's website and decided on the Clear Spot Voyager.

 

 

Size:

The clear spot voyager is small, when I say small, I mean SMALL. I put a quarter next to the device for comparison purposes, as you can see, its the size of about 4 quarters, and is very thin as well... This is a device you can stuff in your wallet pocket and take with you!

 

Battery:

It has a micro USB port in the back, and will charge connected to a computer, or of course by an A/C connection. I have found that the battery last about 5 hours of heavy usage without a charge. The battery is non-serviceable, meaning when it dies, the device dies with it, unless you use the USB cord. I don't think this will be a problem as by the time these batteries die, clear will be pawning people off to an LTE solution, which makes this a great in between device.

 

Speed:

I put this thru the paces at my work, and discovered this is good for 6-10mbps down, and 1-1.3mbps up, I will continue to monitor over the next few weeks, and if anyones interested, I'd be more than glad to provide more results after a few more weeks of heavy usage.

 

Service:

I get a touch of service, meaning 1 bar or less of service depending on what room I am in, in my home. So for me this is a work only device, ironically enough I work only 3 miles from my home, I was really hoping to get good service where I live, this just wont be the case, my TWC wideband at home more than makes up for that anyways. Service at work is great, like I mentioned earlier in the post, my office is only 1/4th of a mile away from the tower, so at work I get "all the bars" which is a loaded expression, but for the purposes of this review, signal strength numbers really do not apply.

 

 

Finally, my last impression for this device is, if you live in an "excellent" WiMAX coverage area, and won't have Sprint LTE for awhile, this device may appeal to you. There are no contracts, I paid $53 with tax for this at best buy, and activated it at home as a customer owned device. This means you can cancel at any time. The plans are very flexible as well, you can buy as low as 2 hours of service, to a day of service, a week of service, and finally a month of service. If you buy a month of service you agree to be billed every calendar month after the day you signed up, but as I said before, there are no commitments, cancel guilt free when Sprint LTE comes to your town. Those are my 2 cents.

 

I give this device/service a 6/10.

IMG_20120715_163558.jpg

IMG_20120715_163618.jpg

IMG_20120715_163703.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

im happy to report, i am still using it at work, i put some 3M double sided tape on it, taped it to top of cube... and i pull a consistant 7-8mb down, 1-1.5mb up, which is more than enough for my needs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

im happy to report, i am still using it at work, i put some 3M double sided tape on it, taped it to top of cube... and i pull a consistant 7-8mb down, 1-1.5mb up, which is more than enough for my needs.

 

How much data are you using per month?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Picked one up today at best buy for 50$, was able to get it activated and working and then clear's website totally went belly up.

 

The spot itself has been working fine though, seems to work even better than my evo 3d at getting and staying connected to wimax.

 

It's remarkably small and light. About half the size of an iphone or so.

 

First impression is that you should pick one up if you are in a good coverage clear market and can use a nice portable hotspot.

 

No contract, so you can pay for only the time you need it.

 

It works well with both usb connected (like a dongle, but with a standard micro-usb cable/charger) and wifi.

 

 

The 8 device limit is just annoying though.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That particular model also has serious issues getting good throughput. I've seen a max of about 8-9 Mbps on it when the network could do double that with the home modem. Much lower signals too. But hey, it's small...and the field test system is one of the best I've seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Verizon hotspot is also limited to 8 devices. I think I've never exceeded 4 connections.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 8 device limit is just annoying though.

 

Clearly, Dick Van Patten was wrong. Eight is NOT enough.

 

Eightcastshot.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? A limit of 8 devices annoys you?

 

Well let's see my gadgets include, 2 phones, laptop, and a tablet. So that is just 4 by myself. Not even including other potentially wireless devices like wii and xbox which are plugged into the ethernet and dsl.

 

Add 2 or 3 other people in the house and their phone + whatever, plus any number of guests etc.

 

Obviously not everyone is going to be sucking down netflix at the same time, but once a device has connected, it will tend to stay connected and/or reconnect at will and these connection add up and can prevent other devices from connecting.

 

And since Idling on wifi (even with a hotspot) is better than the same devices idling on 3g/4g, I would expect less wisecracks about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And since Idling on wifi (even with a hotspot) is better than the same devices idling on 3g/4g, I would expect less wisecracks about it.

 

It sounds like you need to get FTTB -- fiber to the body. Or you can realize that not all of your four devices need to be connected at the same time.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That particular model also has serious issues getting good throughput. I've seen a max of about 8-9 Mbps on it when the network could do double that with the home modem. Much lower signals too. But hey, it's small...and the field test system is one of the best I've seen.

 

Thanks for the reply. I think I've only seen 10+ meg on either of my evo's a couple times, so up to 8-9 would be fine with me and better than I typically see anyway.

 

By field test, do you mean the 4g info shown on the advanced settings? or is there some special url or way to access more info?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just bought the Clear Spot Voyager. Better signal strength than the latest Virgin Mobile and T-mobile portable devices I tested (and returned). Delightfully tiny device. But I can't find this info:

 

1) Can I leave this unit plugged in 24/7? Store rep advised against it but didn't really know. So far the surface hasn't become too warm.

2) Does the Clear Modem with Wi-Fi (same price, not portable) receive a stronger signal? Store rep says they're equal, but you'd think a bigger device would give me more bars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just bought the Clear Spot Voyager. Better signal strength than the latest Virgin Mobile and T-mobile portable devices I tested (and returned). Delightfully tiny device. But I can't find this info:

 

1) Can I leave this unit plugged in 24/7? Store rep advised against it but didn't really know. So far the surface hasn't become too warm.

2) Does the Clear Modem with Wi-Fi (same price' date=' not portable) receive a stronger signal? Store rep says they're equal, but you'd think a bigger device would give me more bars.[/quote']

 

1) It's perfectly safe to leave it plugged in 24/7.

 

2) The Clear modem with wifi has a better antenna than the Voyager. It has been proven in the past. Don't remember where the post is regarding it though.

 

Sent from my LG Viper 4G LTE using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) It's perfectly safe to leave it plugged in 24/7.

 

2) The Clear modem with wifi has a better antenna than the Voyager. It has been proven in the past. Don't remember where the post is regarding it though.

 

Sent from my LG Viper 4G LTE using Forum Runner

Thanks for the feedback! I'm averaging 1.13Mbps download in my brick building with the Voyager, tops 1.26. Surely we can do better with 4g! You've inspired me to exchange for the Modem with Wi-Fi. Assuming I survive Hurricane Sandy, I'll report back... Edited by biff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feedback! I'm averaging 1.13Mbps download in my brick building with the Voyager, tops 1.26. Surely we can do better with 4g! You've inspired me to exchange for the Modem with Wi-Fi. Assuming I survive Hurricane Sandy, I'll report back...

 

Be careful over there on the east side of the country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone long time lurker. Thought I would reply to the 8 device limit. You have to remember that processing power is limited in these devices. The more wifi connections the faster the processor needs to be. Otherwise things slow down even if you have great internet connection.

 

I have a ispot for over 2 years in the DC area and it has been great. I get 4-6Mbps down and 1.5Mbps up.

 

Even during hurricane Sandy I have a -58 rssi and 31 cinr connection. Clear has been reliable through every weather disaster I have experienced in DC.

 

Good luck to all weathering the storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even during hurricane Sandy I have a -58 rssi and 31 cinr connection. Clear has been reliable through every weather disaster I have experienced in DC.

 

To be honest, that speaks less to the reliability of Clearwire's WiMAX service, more to your proximity to the cell site. With -58 dBm RSSI and 31 dB CINR (carrier to interference and noise ratio), you are located very close to the site.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably correct about proximity to the cell site. According to clear's website I am a little more than a 1 mile (as a bird flies) from the nearest tower. It also helps I put my ispot in the attic of a 3 story home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably correct about proximity to the cell site. According to clear's website I am a little more than a 1 mile (as a bird flies) from the nearest tower. It also helps I put my ispot in the attic of a 3 story home.

Since when was there a database of Clear towers? EDIT: Just saw the site, new coverage map! That's very helpful. Never realized coverage was so "swiss cheesy".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if I should start a new thread about this, but the Voyager is part of my inquiry, we'll try here first. As some others have commented, Clear sales people have been pushing the current generation device (Voyager included) out the door with a promise that they will be "LTE ready" when Clear's network is upgraded. Most of us here on the forums would immediately dismiss this chit-chat as people not knowing what they are talking about, much like promises of LTE by a certain date from Sprint sales people. However upon interviewing sales associates and a "manager", who readily admit they don't have any idea what TD-LTE is, or by what nature the devices they are selling would be "upgraded", it was revealed to me that the "LTE ready" line was actually put in their sales literature. This indicates to me that someone several levels removed from facing consumers made this decision..

 

So how about it? I was and still am of the opinion that handset sized TD-LTE chipsets are not on these fine shores, mostly because i haven't seen any FCC docs about them. Is it possible that the hardware is there but inactive? Or is Clear about to have another class action on their hands?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if I should start a new thread about this' date=' but the Voyager is part of my inquiry, we'll try here first. As some others have commented, Clear sales people have been pushing the current generation device (Voyager included) out the door with a promise that they will be "LTE ready" when Clear's network is upgraded. Most of us here on the forums would immediately dismiss this chit-chat as people not knowing what they are talking about, much like promises of LTE by a certain date from Sprint sales people. However upon interviewing sales associates and a "manager", who readily admit they don't have any idea what TD-LTE is, or by what nature the devices they are selling would be "upgraded", it was revealed to me that the "LTE ready" line was actually put in their sales literature. This indicates to me that someone several levels removed from facing consumers made this decision..

 

So how about it? I was and still am of the opinion that handset sized TD-LTE chipsets are not on these fine shores, mostly because i haven't seen any FCC docs about them. Is it possible that the hardware is there but inactive? Or is Clear about to have another class action on their hands?[/quote']

 

I'm going to guess class action lawsuit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just installed the update, and it's good!  As you recommended, I turned off both TA adjustments, and turned on displaying it when it's zero.  The value is basically spot-on.  It's bouncing between 18 and 19 for the Cameron Valley site, and it is in fact between 0.87 and 0.92 miles, as displayed in the app.  This is probably a better estimate of the TA values than any other device I own provides. As far as the -44 goes, I'll have to take it out and verify that it no longer records those cases. If this device didn't have that annoying reset problem, and got the Android 14 update (and in so doing supported TA on NR and continued to allow band locking), it would easily be the best device I own.  Easily.  And would be the device I standardize on for the 5G era.  I'll probably have to wait for a future device to come out with Android 14 and then see what happens. And I know I didn't have to, but I love SCP.  It is my primary tool for tracking the goings-on of the various networks and is very easy to use and work with across my 10 phones.  I am very happy to send a token of my appreciation your way now and then.  Thanks again! - Trip
    • Sorry, I misread your message -- yes, the app would show 0 if an invalid value was being reported. I don't think I had any MediaTek devices myself, but the beta testers have had a decent variety of devices over the years.   Sorry, I didn't word that very well in my last post -- I added an option to control display of LTE TA when it is 0. By default it will now be hidden (sadly a lot of devices do not show it) but anyone who wants to display it can adjust accordingly. There will be 3 user-selectable options related to LTE TA now -- the existing correction option, correction on LTE-TDD (which is independent/in addition to the existing correction option), and TA:0 display. In your case, I'd disable the TDD option and enable the TA:0 option; the defaults will be the opposite of what I think you need.   You did not have to do that, but I sincerely appreciate it, thank you! Beta update is rolling out now, let me know how it goes.
    • In order: This is very helpful to know.  Thanks. That makes a lot of sense, though it's showing me zero rather than nothing; it looks like if it's calculating a negative number, I'm seeing zero instead.  It makes me wonder how many devices you've tested against which use the MediaTek chipset.  This is only the second one I've used, and the first one was very, very old (didn't have B41), so it's possible that the MediaTek chip doesn't need the correction while others do.  Separately, I doubt that a real world case will ever see 1282, so I imagine any value above 1281 could be ignored. I would ask you to please not hide TA values of 0, or if you hide them by default, add an option to not hide them.  I am aware that, for example, the S22 doesn't report a valid TA value and always reports zero, but zero is a legitimate value and is useful to know when trying to identify sites. I'll look forward to your impending update, and I'm going to send along another donation if I can find the link.  Thanks so much, as always!  - Trip
    • I received the reports, thanks! You didn't catch it happening (it captures the diagnostics as soon as you hit send or long-click the connection banner on the main screen), and I had sent you an e-mail to clarify which value was -3.. but your screenshots confirmed my hunch that you meant RSRQ!   I know exactly what is happening here. Somewhere along the way, I learned that TD-LTE bands (33-53) needed a TA correction of -19 applied, and I confirmed it on several devices. Perhaps that is no longer universally true.. but what you're seeing SCP display matches that correction. Below 19 you see nothing, at 19 you see 0, and above that you see TA-19. The upper limit is 1282, which is why you see 1263. Your phone must report 1282 when the TA is unknown, which is not technically safe but I can work around that. Funny enough, I had a change to TA coming in the next update that had nothing to do with your issues.. TA:0 will be hidden moving forward, since several devices report 0 when it cannot be identified. I'll have an app update out shortly that addresses all of this, let me know how it works for you and thanks for the detailed feedback!
    • Mike, We ended up going out this morning to do errands in spite of the tropical storm.  I locked the phone on LTE B41, turned off the TA correction checkbox, and watched it carefully while out and about.  I have four screenshots for you. https://imgur.com/a/kCPTCnB First, I happened to get a screenshot of it doing the -44 dBm thing.  I also tried to send you at least one set of diagnostics showing the -44 dBm but I don't know where precisely in the process it collects the diagnostics.  Hopefully there's something useful in them. The rest of the screenshots are far more interesting.  All three were taken within seconds of each other in the CVS parking lot.  The phone's diagnostic screen shows a TA of 17, and oddly, the SCP diagnostics screenshot also appears to show a TA of 17.  But SCP's normal display is showing 0.  Not entirely sure what to make of that.  It looks like SCP won't show me a value other than 0 until I hit about 19 according to the phone diagnostic screen. It also appears that when SCP is showing a TA of 1263, that's the equivalent of a null value for the TA--no TA is calculated.  The phone diagnostic screen appears to show just "12" when that's happening; the SCP diagnostic screen shows 1282 in the TA section when that happens, a difference of 19, which is highly convenient given what I noted above about the TA value.  (I can't test that the phone diagnostic screen is limited to two characters and is thus truncating 1282 to just "12" as I suspect given where I am right now.  Had I known to be looking for it, I'd have tested in the middle of nowhere yesterday.) Anything catch your eye?  Anything I can do to help more?  - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...