Jump to content

"Lightsquared gets additional rope"


xcharles718

Recommended Posts

I guess they're still working on attempting that DoD spectrum swap.

 

From Daily Wireless

http://www.dailywire...dditional-rope/

 

...LightSquared has reportedly reached a $190 million agreement with its creditors that will let it continue operations until September 2013, Bloomberg reports. At stake was the company’s ability to draw upon $190 million of encumbered cash at LightSquared LP, the main operating subsidiary of the company.

 

LightSquared filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in May after LightSquared’s founder, Harbinger Capital Partners CEO Philip Falcone, failed to strike a deal with lenders — holding more than $1 billion in company debt — to keep the company afloat.

 

 

The deal will allow the company to use as much as $190 million in collateral until the fall of next year while repaying creditors $6.25 million a month.

Meanwhile, a group of lawmakers pressed the FCC to review using Department of Defense spectrum for LightSquared.

“A spectrum swap is the most resourceful and efficient way to quickly expand broadband access nationwide,” the letter said. The letter was sent by Reps. Jim Moran (D-Va.), Maurice Hinchey (D-N.Y.), Steve Rothman (D-N.J.) Rodney Alexander (R-La.) and Ander Crenshaw (R-Fla.), all members of the House Appropriations Committee...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope they do not get it. I'd rather it go to someone like tmobile/sprint/ other RCA members over light squared.

 

FCC could give sprint the 700 and sprint give up the 800mhz.

 

Or tmobile buys 10mhz of the spectrum, and promises to build out the full 20mhz all over it's network.

 

Either way, we would have 3 national carriers using 700mhz, and if FCC forces interpolabolity. We could have smaller regional guys have the ability to roam on any of the three.

 

That sounds like a better plan than rewarding light squared on a failed gamble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope they do not get it. I'd rather it go to someone like tmobile/sprint/ other RCA members over light squared.

 

FCC could give sprint the 700 and sprint give up the 800mhz.

 

Or tmobile buys 10mhz of the spectrum, and promises to build out the full 20mhz all over it's network.

 

Either way, we would have 3 national carriers using 700mhz, and if FCC forces interpolabolity. We could have smaller regional guys have the ability to roam on any of the three.

 

That sounds like a better plan than rewarding light squared on a failed gamble.

 

Where would they get this 700MHz spectrum that you're talking about? All of the 700MHz spectrum has been spoken for with public safety taking a big chunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I am mistaken, isn't the spectrum light squared is trying to swap for is the public safety 700mhz.

 

 

Also AT&T only has 20mhz in like 1/3 of the country. Another 1/3 has 10mhz and the last 1/3 has no 700mhz. I believe Chicago is a 10mhz market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I am mistaken' date=' isn't the spectrum light squared is trying to swap for is the public safety 700mhz.

 

Also AT&T only has 20mhz in like 1/3 of the country. Another 1/3 has 10mhz and the last 1/3 has no 700mhz. I believe Chicago is a 10mhz market.[/quote']

 

Lightsquared is trying to swap for Department of Defense spectrum. I believe that the lowest frequency they could hope for from the DOD is in the 900 mhz band, but realistically, they will probably get something comparable to what they had, just without the interference issues.

 

Sent from my CM9 Toro using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I am mistaken, isn't the spectrum light squared is trying to swap for is the public safety 700mhz.

 

 

Also AT&T only has 20mhz in like 1/3 of the country. Another 1/3 has 10mhz and the last 1/3 has no 700mhz. I believe Chicago is a 10mhz market.

 

As if PS is going to just roll over and play dead!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

So I was looking through the permits for CT and saw that lightsquared was approved to install 3 antennas on a cell tower in Avon CT at 376 deercliff rd.

Last year they had applied for quite a few of them inside the Vegas City limits.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year they had applied for quite a few of them inside the Vegas City limits.

 

Las Vegas was a LightSquared test bed.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Last year they had applied for quite a few of them inside the Vegas City limits.

 

 

Las Vegas was a LightSquared test bed.

 

AJ

I figured as such, but they let quite a few of their permits lapse without doing anything to them.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured as such, but they let quite a few of their permits lapse without doing anything to them.

 

But with the permits they did use, they wrecked GPS.  So, that has to count for something.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was in Red Hook again and I swear there are more Link5G sites as there are Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T small cells combined in the entire neighborhood. It seemed like every other street I turned down had one installed. Hopefully carriers will start hopping on them soon. Seems like a lot of effort to go through for no one to use them.  — — — — — T-Mobile converted the Sprint site on top of NYU Langone Brooklyn in Sunset Park. I first mapped one sector of it back in November 2023 but I thought it was a small cell so I never pinned it but I ran into another sector today which caught me off guard. I'm unable to find a permit for the conversion so it's definitely a surprise. There's another T-Mobile site 1 block away that T-Mobile initially installed back in 2019 so I'm kinda surprised they're keeping both considering the Sprint conversion is on a much taller building and coule potentially provide much better coverage to the entire area.  — — — — — The old permit expired for this site without any work being done but a new permit was just approved a few days ago for a T-Mobile site at this address. Description mentions 3 antennas with 2 RRUs per sector. My guess is they're doing something similar to what they did at 360 Furman St in Brooklyn where they broadcast Band 2/66 and n25/41 from one antenna. It's a bit of a downgrade considering the site it's replacing was a full build with Ericsson 6449s. 
    • Still not seeing any ULS postings for pending T-Mobile UScellular merger in Dane county Wisconsin.
    • Came across another Crown Castle Solutions multi-tenant oDAS node in Brooklyn. Located at 40.7002286, -73.9612666. Nothing on T-Mobile or AT&T so I'm assuming these are all Verizon nodes that Crown Castle is anticipating another carrier will hop on down the line.
    • Same with factory unlocked
    • June security update is out (S22U TMO)
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...