Jump to content

ICS Debug Lock Code Mystery Resolved - Finally


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

OK...this is probably not a big deal to most of you. But ever since I upgraded my E4GT a few months ago to ICS, I haven't been able to access my DEBUG menu. Which for me is a big deal. I live in that screen!

 

The Debug Screen is where wireless nerds hang out to see what channel they are on, look at their Mac Index, check out their Ec/Io ratio, etc. However, when I upgraded to ICS on my E4GT, it asked for me to enter a lock code. I assumed this was the MSL Code, which all Samsung devices have required to access debug screens in the past...but alas, no.

 

For months I have been searching for a work around, perusing forums, scouring developer comments and I haven't found anything. That is, until today.

 

THE ICS DEBUG LOCK CODE IS: 777468

 

It works on both my Galaxy Nexus and Epic 4G Touch. I went to try it on my EVO LTE, but the debug menu there isn't locked with a code. It may work in other ICS ROMs and devices too. Sound off below if you find it works in other places.

 

Special thanks to BigRushDog on XDA who posted the solution.

 

And for those of you who do not know, to access your Debug screen, go to your phone dialer and enter ##DEBUG# in your keypad. In the GNex, you have to enter *#*#DEBUG#*#*

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert, will you post some screen caps of the ICS debug screen? I would be very interested to see the fields contained within, as every debug screen/engineering screen/field trial app presents signal diagnostics a bit differently.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert, will you post some screen caps of the ICS debug screen? I would be very interested to see the fields contained within, as every debug screen/engineering screen/field trial app presents signal diagnostics a bit differently.

 

AJ

 

Here are a few screen caps - maybe you could walk us through what we should be looking at?

 

7357598866_3e804411bc_z.jpg

7172385469_b45915d850_z.jpg

7172386335_3c6c1759b4_z.jpg

7357602728_7d23d56bec_z.jpg

7357603100_a5fb124d07_z.jpg

7357603804_dc26e9401d_z.jpg

7172388373_109c8ae515_z.jpg

7172388743_7ac4597f72_z.jpg

 

 

Robert - thanks for finding this! I had all but given up.

 

here is the EVO 4G LTE in the exact same location where I took screenshot of GNEX

7172465479_5408bebec5.jpg

7172465503_976912dbc4.jpg

 

can we make any meaningful comparison between the two?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your signal is amazing. You must be right next to a cell site!

 

I was going to ask if his phones were laying next to an airave. I am in a parking lot with a sprint tower and have a -60 signal.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to ask if his phones were laying next to an airave. I am in a parking lot with a sprint tower and have a -60 signal.

 

With a -44 dBm signal, that handset could be practically humping an Airave.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Galaxy Nexus engineering screens line up quite consistently with the EVO LTE engineering screens. That has not always been the case. So, both are likely utilizing the same signal diagnostics embedded into Android 4.0.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a -44 dBm signal, that handset could be practically humping an Airave.

 

AJ

 

no airave - just an advantage of living "downtown"

 

Was able to get the EVO down to -41 and the GNEX down to -43 for the 1x engineering menu.

 

7358947656_458d6f73c0.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the GNex has already been posted, I will post the E4GT with ICS for comparison:

 

gallery_1_1_9845.jpg

 

 

gallery_1_1_6540.jpg

 

 

gallery_1_1_7497.jpg

 

 

gallery_1_1_28790.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

no airave - just an advantage of living "downtown"

 

Was able to get the EVO down to -41 and the GNEX down to -43 for the 1x engineering menu.

 

7358947656_458d6f73c0.jpg

 

Wow... Does your body get warm when you stand by the window? That's some crazy signal. That panel must be right next to you. Are you sure you aren't a NV contractor climbing on the tower rack taking screen shots? :)

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Wow... Does your body get warm when you stand by the window? That's some crazy signal. That panel must be right next to you. Are you sure you aren't a NV contractor climbing on the tower rack taking screen shots? :)

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

He must live on the top floor not far from the panels.

 

Sent from my LG Viper 4G LTE using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He must live on the top floor not far from the panels.

 

Sent from my LG Viper 4G LTE using Forum Runner

 

Yup. I have a pretty good view. Location posted here:

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/373-my-tower/page__view__findpost__p__10207

 

the panels that are flush with the building are Sprint and clearwire. The panels that are higher are Verizon (I think).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup. I have a pretty good view. Location posted here:

 

http://s4gru.com/ind...dpost__p__10207

 

the panels that are flush with the building are Sprint and clearwire. The panels that are higher are Verizon (I think).

 

How much of a zoom lens do you have that you can get me a close up of the Clearwire panels? I have something similar to that in Lansing and want to make a comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Anyone know how to map the channel numbers to actual frequencies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know how to map the channel numbers to actual frequencies?

 

What type of channel numbers? CDMA2000, WiMAX, or LTE? ARFCN conversion varies by band and airlink tech.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CDMA2000 1900/800 and LTE 800. Playing around with a SDR and want to take a look at the signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back to the "my signal is stronger than yours" argument...the signal is usually in the -40s. Crazy talk...but that's what happens when the cell site is a block and a half away.

 

ForumRunner_20120630_212734.png

 

I would get pictures, but I would need to climb up on a mountain or somethig to be able to see the roof of the four-story building where the site sits. Maybe tomorrow, since mountains aren't exactly in short supply around here :)

 

Sent from my Galaxy SIII-32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having trouble with the difference between RX power (pilot stregenth?) and RSSI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
So in other words the lock code is "sprint" 777468 that is an easier way to remember it :)

 

Never noticed that. Thanks!

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • As far as I know it's ubiquitous. Ultimately the network decides if you should use VoNR vs VoLTE but pretty much anytime my phone is in standalone mode and I place a call, it goes over NR.   Yup, it was terrible. After a while, I just connected to the WiFi, and that worked fine at about 90Mbps. I get the feeling that rather than doing a "real" upgrade where they install new antennas, upgrade backhaul, etc., T-Mobile instead installed new radios onto the existing and already overloaded DAS and called it a day, which isn't enough. Compared to Yankee Stadium, where they actually went and deployed new antennas/radios for their n41 upgrade, and you're able to get upwards of 200Mbps at sold-out games, Arthur Ashe really is a joke. What's worse is that the folks in their NOC likely know this already, but no effort is being made to change that. I'm not asking for T-Mobile to deploy mmWave everywhere like Verizon but there is a real use case for it at stadiums.
    • Does anyone know how well implemented is VoNR in the 5 boroughs. Does anyone use it? I have an iPhone 15 Pro. Does anyone know if T-Mobile is still working on upgrading their network? It seems like the service has gone down. My phone struggles in parts of the Belt Pkwy, and data is slow. 
    • I come to the US Open men’s semifinals and finals every year, and I’ve never been able to use my T-Mobile phone successfully. Usually AT&T is the top performer—good to hear Verizon has upped their game. 
    • One sector down, two more to go — — — — —  I was at Arthur Ashe Stadium for the U.S. Open today and the good news is that there is an n25/41 DAS setup throughout USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center. From the "boardwalk" to the outdoor concession area, to inside the stadium; you connect to standalone n41 and n25 everywhere via oDAS and iDAS. The bad news is that in the actual stadium it's beyond useless. While I saw strong coverage as indicated by signal bars and I was able to make calls and send texts, there was no data throughput at all. Running a speed test failed 9 out of 10 times. The only time I got a speed test to work was by switching to LTE funnily enough or by using NSA 5G where the test would initiate via LTE and then n41 would kick in giving me ~20Mbps. T-Mobile has so much traffic on their 5G network that now n41 gets bogged down before LTE. That was a first for me! In the stadium in the same area Verizon got 1.2Gbps on mmWave and LTE kept timing out when trying to test it. My Boost line on AT&T got upwards of 150Mbps on C-band and I know they have mmWave deployed as I saw their Nokia mmWave antennas deployed but I was unable to test it. In the outdoor concession area T-Mobile performed well getting over 150Mbps on n41. AT&T in these areas saw over 250Mbps on C-band and I didn't get the opportunity to test Verizon there. It just seems like 140MHz n41 is not enough capacity for the amount of people inside the stadium. Hopefully T-Mobile is considering deploying n258 to all of these stadiums since they now own that mmWave nationwide. It'd make a world of difference in terms of capacity at these venues. Bonus Pics: Verizon and AT&T mmWave Hidden carrier neutral DAS: 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...