Jump to content

Why is Sprint's 4G LTE Signal so bad almost everywhere [in my area]?


Recommended Posts

I haven't seen any decent results from B26 yet, it's the same strength as B25 for the most part.

 

I have not experienced optimized B26 yet either, and I've been up and down the Northeast plenty of times in plenty of cities. Maybe this will be a springtime task up here, I know another member from NC said his area just got optimized down there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not experienced optimized B26 yet either, and I've been up and down the Northeast plenty of times in plenty of cities. Maybe this will be a springtime task up here, I know another member from NC said his area just got optimized down there.

Here's hoping it's soon, it would make the experience so much better.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my experience samsung devices hold on to a LTE signal better than HTC. I don't care for the Samsung as I have been loyal to HTC for years. Touch Pro, TP2, HTC EVO (wimax), EVO 3D, Evo LTE, M7, M8 and of course will be getting the M9. I have friends that use Samsung and I have used Samsung phones temporally usually your signal strength is a few points higher and they won't roll to 3G as much as the HTC's. Even an old Galaxy S3 would get 2-3 "bars" where my M8 would get one on my home tower. This is my personal experience but it's been that way for as long as I can remember even on the old wimax devices. Back in the day the sanyo phones with retractable antenna were king for reception. 

Holding on to the LTE signal for to long may actually give you worse performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why exactly would they put up equipment and not optimize it then and there? does it really take that long to 'optimize'?

Different groups of workers. I found that band 25 was optimized within weeks but band 26 that started popping up in January still is not optimized
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. B25 "initial optimization" is essentially a flip of a switch that whoever signs off on the installation can do in a few minutes. B26 optimization requires hours if not days per individual tower of testing settings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A friend of mine who works for Ericsson (Sprint's network maintenance) told me that LTE 800 can't be optimized until enough sites that neighbor each other are put into operation, almost every site needs to have 800 except two or three within a larger cluster. When they do optimize a cluster they will leave one on the edge of a cluster non-optimized as a "buffer" to the other sites that are still awaiting optimization to avoid interference.  

 

On another note I aggravate him once a week to get the last three sites in my town put into LTE operation. Good news is that he is suppose to call me before it happens so I can watch a site get integrated with LTE. :)

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're receiving -80dbm on EVDO and -110 on LTE then other you're not connected to the site you think you are, or downtillt hasn't been adjusted at the site.

 

In my experience, per signal check, the LTE (B25) signal is always 25-30dbm weaker than EVDO. I find that unless your EVDO signal is -75 or better you are at risk of dropping LTE. For example, if the evdo signal is -80dbm, the LTE signal will be -105 to -110 and will sometimes drop out completely. And I know for sure it is coming from the same tower. Places where I have almost full bars of 3G can have only 1 bar LTE. I don't know why it is so weak but I hope it improves.. Maybe something is wrong with my phone. No B26 here either so it is almost impossible to get LTE inside buildings at all.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my experience, per signal check, the LTE (B25) signal is always 25-30dbm weaker than EVDO. I find that unless your EVDO signal is -75 or better you are at risk of dropping LTE. For example, if the evdo signal is -80dbm, the LTE signal will be -105 to -110...

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-308-rssi-vs-rsrp-a-brief-lte-signal-strength-primer/

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Right, I know the RSRP is a different value that is always lower. But in terms of comparing 3g and LTE coming from the same site, my point was that on B25, the signal starts to become unusable past -105 (my experience). Since -105 LTE (b25) seems to correlate with -75 to -80 on evdo (1900mhz) from the same tower, this leads to large areas with poor or no LTE even when 3G is very strong. Basically any area where I was used to -80 to -100 evdo (perfectly useable) has marginal or nonexistant LTE coming from the same tower. This creates a lot of gaps in the LTE coverage that will hopefully be resolved by B26.

 

We do have B41 here, which oddly enough seems provide more/better coverage than B25. B41 seems to hold on to much lower RSRP values (down to -120 or -125), which actually seems to provide a better experience than the B25 at -110dbm.

 

Again this is just my experience. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, I know the RSRP is a different value that is always lower. But in terms of comparing 3g and LTE coming from the same site, my point was that on B25, the signal starts to become unusable past -105 (my experience).

 

If LTE becomes unusable below -105 dBm RSRP, your network or device is malfunctioning.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If LTE becomes unusable below -105 dBm RSRP, your network or device is malfunctioning.

 

AJ

Yes AJ, I can verify what you said by actual usage.   I can work with LTE at a -115 level but the download speed will be significantly slower than with a stronger signal.   As I go below -115, the speed gets even slower and I find that most often, it is the transmit from the phone that can not be received at the cell site.  Between -115 and 120, if the phone can successfully transmit a strong enough signal toward the cell site, you can still receive data from the cell site.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If LTE becomes unusable below -105 dBm RSRP, your network or device is malfunctioning.

 

AJ

 

Must be then I guess, although this is my second phone so it must be the towers. B41 chugs along perfectly fine to much lower RSRP, but b25 definitely falls apart for me after 105.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Ive had pretty good luck with Sprint in the back of stores with 3g. It gets me enough data to browse the web efficiently and make calls. However since getting my Nexus 5 I have much greater coverage with the band 26 LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). The do have a reserve level. It is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  They did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, RVs in Walmart parking lots where mobile needs all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71. 93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline in June for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio iirc. No reported sightings.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...