Jump to content

Paynefanbro

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,347

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    210

Paynefanbro last won the day on April 21

Paynefanbro had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
    Unlocked iPhone 15 Pro Max
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Brooklyn, NY
  • Here for...
    4G Information

Recent Profile Visitors

21,768 profile views

Paynefanbro's Achievements

Member Level: LTE Advanced

Member Level: LTE Advanced (12/12)

6.4k

Reputation

  1. Paynefanbro
    T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  2. Paynefanbro
    T-Mobile and EQT Announce Joint Venture to Acquire Lumos and Build Out the Un-carrier’s First Fiber Footprint https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-eqt-jv-to-acquire-lumos
  3. Paynefanbro
    Unable to confirm if it's really off but I noticed this morning that I'm no longer connecting to Band 41 on my home site. Switching my phone to LTE-only pretty much always put me on Band 41 since it was the least used band on T-Mobile's network. Now I'm only able to connect to Band 2/66. Not complaining because it means speeds are faster on LTE and maybe 150MHz n41 is around the corner.
  4. Paynefanbro
    Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  5. Paynefanbro
    New T-Mobile site went live earlier this year at 5 W 86th St, just off of Central Park. It's not a Sprint conversion so I hope this means more new builds are gonna stop popping up in areas that need coverage the most. — — — — — Also spotted a unicorn (mapped a new AT&T site) in Greenpoint. It's eNB ID 115932/119932. I spotted the permit a super long time ago but it looks like it finally went live earlier this month. That makes 5 new AT&T sites in Brooklyn in the past 2 years. — — — — — Noticed that I touched a Sprint conversion site while mapping today. It has been live since at least December and is already on the keep site map. Sprint eNB 74215 -> T-Mobile gNB 1371628 Located at: 40.767977371545726, -73.96146218469505 Still a bunch more we've found that don't have any decommission permits submitted yet. — — — — — Adding a bunch of gig+ sites I haven't reported yet. eNB 44076 Located at 40.72513188568983, -73.95130108843207 eNB 44110 Located at 40.78671665921442, -73.97831748836762 eNB 47002 Located at 40.71818871096234, -73.97553242675835 eNB 48023 Located at 40.70014576627346, -73.95511802661758 eNB 129912/130917 Located at 40.71727220756978, -73.95652417532955 eNB 875917 Located at 40.72274052431834, -73.84403351784677 eNB 49849 Located at 40.72181611705532, -73.86627810663067
  6. Paynefanbro
    Here in NYC I don’t think NextWave even has any clients. By my count they only have about two dozen sites deployed across the entire city. It’s pretty much a network only put up to try to pressure T-Mobile into buying them by forcing T-Mobile to switch their n41 configuration from 140MHz to 80MHz over a growing portion of the city. That’s not competitive with Verizon who has 160MHz citywide. I hope we get to the point soon where T-Mobile decides it’s worth it to just buy out NextWave, take over their leases, and finally have a full 190MHz across the city.
  7. Paynefanbro
    NextWave is complaining about interference from T-Mobile's network again. It's super annoying considering the area where T-Mobile operates a full 150MHz of BRS/EBS shrank significantly in late 2023. In a place as dense as NYC, have two operators with such split holdings of this band doesn't make sense. Interference seems nearly inevitable. Next Wave has only submitted permits for 22 sites so far, they honestly should just sell. https://www.lightreading.com/5g/redzone-nextwave-also-complain-of-interference-from-t-mobile-s-5g
  8. Paynefanbro
    Yeah they definitely have 160MHz live but no idea if SCP reports properly. I only have Cellmapper on my Android device and only map AT&T and T-Mobile at the moment. Also no standalone on Verizon here.
  9. Paynefanbro
    There's a permit for a new 47 story building at 205 Montague St in Downtown Brooklyn. The problem is that T-Mobile eNB 48352 is on the building next door and this new building will block two out of 3 sectors of the site. For reference, the new building will be roughly as tall as 16 Court St which is right across the street. This site is the primary site covering Cadman Plaza so I wonder what the plan is. Will they just try to change sector placement, move to a different building, or will this just speed up the conversion of the Sprint site at 25 Monroe Place?
  10. Paynefanbro
    I'm confused. The screenshot in the post shows a 90MHz secondary carrier and a 20MHz n25 carrier, not a third 10MHz n41 carrier.
  11. Paynefanbro
    Mapped a bit of Perth Amboy since it seemed undermapped on Cellmapper. There are no Sprint conversions in the city however I did map a new build and one older site that had never been mapped before. The part that stood out to me while mapping the city is T-Mobile's site density in comparison to AT&T specifically since those are the two networks that I map. T-Mobile has 10 sites within city limits in comparison to AT&T's 4 sites. AT&T still performs great there thanks to their combo of C-band and DoD spectrum. I got max speeds of about 650Mbps right under a site but those speeds quickly drop off the farther you go from the site. In some parts of the city I couldn't get any more than ~40Mbps on AT&T because I was at the edge of the C-band cell and I'm certain most of the throughput was coming from the lowband I was aggregating with. T-Mobile on the other hand couldn't get the peak speeds that AT&T had because of NextWave encumbering them. They only have 40+40 n41 but had much more consistent 300-400Mbps speeds virtually everywhere I went and a much stronger signal. The only area where they struggled in terms of speed was around Five Corners where T-Mobile has a site on top of the Perth Amboy National Bank Building but it hasn't been upgraded just yet. They only have n71 and n25 on that site. I got speeds of about 150-200Mbps under that site which isn't bad but it's also the busiest area of the city so they definitely could use the capacity.
  12. Paynefanbro
    T-Mobile eliminated the 10MHz Band 41 carrier in Suffolk County and is now running 150MHz n41. Here's a screenshot of the 50MHz second carrier. I'm guessing it'll make its way west toward NYC in the coming weeks.
  13. Paynefanbro
    Following up on this. I just went up to City Island and it looks like T-Mobile is giving them the Broad Channel treatment by adding a bunch of small cells throughout the island. I mapped three new ones today bringing them to a total of seven small cells. It's still not a replacement for actual macros though. They need to join Verizon and AT&T in adding at least one more site closer to the north end of the island. Also snapped a pic of the upgraded site. Gone is the old split sector antenna they had on the east facing sector. — — — — — I mapped a recently upgraded site in Cobble Hill earlier and noticed that the gNB IDs for n41 and n25/71 are separated by two. Maybe it's a sneak peak into the numbering scheme going forward? gNB ID 1089448 is n41 and 1089450 is n25/71. Maybe n66 or n77 will be given 1089449.
  14. Paynefanbro
    New AT&T speed record for me. I encountered an AT&T site with upgraded backhaul in Crown Heights. I'm certain I can hit 1Gbps on this site off-peak.
  15. Paynefanbro
    Dish marks 5G drive test milestone, validating its network speeds https://www.fiercewireless.com/5g/dish-marks-5g-drive-test-milestone And yet barely anyone can use it. That's probably the only reason why they're able to meet these network speed milestones.
×
×
  • Create New...