Jump to content

iPhone 7/7 Plus User's Thread


MacinJosh

Recommended Posts

For iPhones:

 

HD Voice will work over cellular Sprint to cellular Sprint calls even if either device has Wi-Fi Calling enabled on their account. This was fixed last year. 

 

If one party is using Sprint Wi-Fi calling for the call, and one is cellular, it will not be HD. 

 

If both parties are using Sprint Wi-Fi calling for the call, it will be HD. 

 

Really all that's left is the ability to do HD voice on cellular to Wi-Fi calls (or vice versa).... and then cross-carrier compatibility. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For iPhones:

 

HD Voice will work over cellular Sprint to cellular Sprint calls even if either device has Wi-Fi Calling enabled on their account. This was fixed last year.

 

If one party is using Sprint Wi-Fi calling for the call, and one is cellular, it will not be HD.

 

If both parties are using Sprint Wi-Fi calling for the call, it will be HD.

 

Really all that's left is the ability to do HD voice on cellular to Wi-Fi calls (or vice versa).... and then cross-carrier compatibility.

On my initial test, ur conclusion is wrong....

 

Turned wifi calling on, made wifi call from home and non hd of course.

 

Walked out of my wifi range and made a call, phone call is not hd....

 

More testing needed of course!!!

 

fa6542407af441fe4731d7ac9f3d4857.jpg

 

https://www.sprint.com/en/support/solutions/services/faqs-about-wi-fi-calling.html

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who/what were you calling?

 

Also, I don't know why they say HD voice is disabled with Wi-Fi calling, because it sounds glorious when talking to another Sprint user that is on Wi-Fi calling.

 

Maybe they mean it doesn't work, because they assume you'll be calling Cellular sprint users? (In which case they're right, it won't be HD from wifi to cellular)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who/what were you calling?

 

Also, I don't know why they say HD voice is disabled with Wi-Fi calling, because it sounds glorious when talking to another Sprint user that is on Wi-Fi calling.

 

Maybe they mean it doesn't work, because they assume you'll be calling Cellular sprint users? (In which case they're right, it won't be HD from wifi to cellular)

Both my dad and my sister have wifi calling enabled on their line (LG G6 and iPhone 7) and they no longer get Sprint HD calling at all while on cellular. Wifi calls sound good, but enabling wifi calling on your line even if you don't use it kills a lot of features for some reason.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tested again, hd calling is not working and won't work on iPhone until u call and have that specific soc code removed from ur line...

 

Called sprint iPhone to android and no hd voice.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tested again, hd calling is not working and won't work on iPhone until u call and have that specific soc code removed from ur line...

 

Called sprint iPhone to android and no hd voice.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This has been my families experience as well. iPhone to iPhone, iPhone to Android, Android to Android it doesn't seem to matter. It's like the wifi calling option on the line disables HD calling among other features. To be clear wifi calls still sound good, but Sprint HD calling on cellular seems to get disabled once wifi calling is enabled on that line.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only interesting thing in the update cellular-wise is that you are no longer able to display your signal strength in dBm at the top of your phone. You’re stuck with bars. And there are only four of them now, not five...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only interesting thing in the update cellular-wise is that you are no longer able to display your signal strength in dBm at the top of your phone. You’re stuck with bars. And there are only four of them now, not five...

Yeah I noticed this too. Android has 4 bars, correct?

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that Android had 5 although I may be wrong...

Android doesn't really have bars anymore, it's a little wedge and there seems to be more than five "levels" from what I can tell.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Android doesn't really have bars anymore, it's a little wedge and there seems to be more than five "levels" from what I can tell.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Oh...I was under the impression that there were five levels in the little wedge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah okay. I had thought I had seen Android devices with four bars. Maybe it was older devices with older versions of Android on them. Oh well, either way I would prefer the fifth bar in iOS 11's new signal indicator.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah okay. I had thought I had seen Android devices with four bars. Maybe it was older devices with older versions of Android on them. Oh well, either way I would prefer the fifth bar in iOS 11's new signal indicator.

 

-Anthony

Agreed. As well as the option to display dBm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Still the same old Field Test :(. Only difference is that you can’t display dBm in your status bar anymore.

It doesn't display dBm on the status bar while in Field Test anymore either?

 

Also, does the information populate faster, or is it still sporadic at times?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 7 Plus using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't display dBm on the status bar while in Field Test anymore either?

 

Also, does the information populate faster, or is it still sporadic at times?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 7 Plus using Tapatalk Pro

Seems to populate faster but need to pay more attention....

 

0e5c2e81ca85535067a866b15257a466.jpg61fc69cf1544005e28b4004f6ae6972c.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to populate faster but need to pay more attention....

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That status bar sure looks nicer with signal bars. Will definitely miss seeing dBm up there though.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 7 Plus using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...