Jump to content

HTC EVO 4G LTE


P_M_G

Recommended Posts

In the specs I read it says its capable of the 800mhz channel. Is this the LTE channel that Sprint will be switching on in a year or two to compliment the 1900 band (when Nextel is switched off) ? Maybe its a stupid question. In other words is it future proof?

Edited by tampaflusa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the specs I read it says its capable of the 800mhz channel. Is this the LTE channel that Sprint will be switching on in a year or two to compliment the 1900 band (when Nextel is switched off) ? Maybe its a stupid question. In other words is it future proof?

 

On Sprint's network, it will only do 800 Voice/1xAdvanced. No LTE on 800. It supports LTE on 1900 only. However, it will be almost two years before 800 LTE is out in a big way on Sprints network anyway. That wouldn't hold me up from upgrading at this point for a device I want.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In other words is it future proof?

 

Not even close. No handset is ever "future proof." Under the 18-24 month contract-subsidy system, by the time that you are eligible for a fully subsidized upgrade, no matter what handset you choose, it will be woefully outdated. A dozen years ago, I seriously thought that this would be just about the only cellphone that I would ever need. How naive was that?!

 

7wql7jr.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it possible that even though the phone is listed as supporting just 1900 LTE, that in the future when Clear's 2.5GHz LTE is up live, or when Sprints 800MHz LTE is live that they could update the radio/baseband and enable support for more later on?

Would require another pass through FCC getting approved of course, but is it possible?

 

Would one be able to tell if the specs of the antennae supported such theory at all from FCC docs or teardown pics? I know FCC only lists freq tested at but maybe specs/details listed of antennae could determine if its plausible?

 

Sgt., to address your questions more seriously, the chances that the EVO 4G LTE will go through FCC authorization for LTE 1900 (band class 25) now, then FCC authorization for LTE 800 (band class 18 or 26) and/or TD-LTE 2600 (band class 41) in the future are slim to none.

 

When a grantee files a follow up application, it is almost always for 1) a minor modification prior to commercial release or 2) a revision for release on another carrier. But it is rarely to add a substantial radio feature after a device has already been released.

 

The converse, though, is often true. A device may be tested and authorized for radio capabilities that are never utilized or are even locked out through firmware. AT&T, for example, is known to lock out AWS 2100+1700 MHz on some of its devices, presumably so that they cannot be as readily used on T-Mobile.

 

Now, as I am known to remind my students, the absence of certain information does not imply the negation of that information. In other words, that nothing has been stated about LTE 800 nor TD-LTE 2600 in the EVO 4G LTE does not tell us that it lacks those capabilities. At this point, we just have an incomplete picture. Maybe it comes through the FCC OET next week with authorization for LTE 800 or TD-LTE 2600 or both. Such is possible, albeit doubtful, because neither the LG Viper nor the Samsung Galaxy Nexus applications have sought beyond 5 MHz x 5 MHz LTE 1900.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sgt., to address your questions more seriously, the chances that the EVO 4G LTE will go through FCC authorization for LTE 1900 (band class 25) now, then FCC authorization for LTE 800 (band class 18 or 26) and/or TD-LTE 2600 (band class 41) in the future are slim to none.

 

When a grantee files a follow up application, it is almost always for 1) a minor modification prior to commercial release or 2) a revision for release on another carrier. But it is rarely to add a substantial radio feature after a device has already been released.

 

The converse, though, is often true. A device may be tested and authorized for radio capabilities that are never utilized or are even locked out through firmware. AT&T, for example, is known to lock out AWS 2100+1700 MHz on some of its devices, presumably so that they cannot be as readily used on T-Mobile.

 

Now, as I am known to remind my students, the absence of certain information does not imply the negation of that information. In other words, that nothing has been stated about LTE 800 nor TD-LTE 2600 in the EVO 4G LTE does not tell us that it lacks those capabilities. At this point, we just have an incomplete picture. Maybe it comes through the FCC OET next week with authorization for LTE 800 or TD-LTE 2600 or both. Such is possible, albeit doubtful, because neither the LG Viper nor the Samsung Galaxy Nexus applications have sought beyond 5 MHz x 5 MHz LTE 1900.

 

AJ

 

Thank you! about what I expected, just didn't know if it was possible...figured since its rare to see devices go through FCC cert a 2nd time that it would be less likely to be done here....I guess the absence of 2.5GHz is whats more disappointing given Clearwire's plan to have 5k sites up by next year... would think sprint would plan ahead for this in the device...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice the pics show 4G in the same spot as 3G which I guess for the sake its using 1900MHz makes sense...Now the big question will be if they will do the same when we can connect to 2.5GHz or 800MHz in the future...as signal will not be near the same as the 1900MHz....I for one would like to be able to force the device to connect to 2.5 or not...rather than have the phone constantly be looking to connect to the 2.5....will be interested to see how they handle this in the future..I assume it will have to do with the smith micro deal and the recently announced new sprint feature they are going to test on the OG EVO4G first...

 

Lot of ?'s regarding the implementation of 2.5GHz LTE now....but guess really should hold off on them till next year at this point...though I would expect to see some Clearwire LTE sites live this year if they plan to get 5k up by next june/july...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no more than 1 page back from here its mentioned already bud...

Haha yeah, I was reading through the first page and completely missed all the other pages... so I edited my comment. Running on a couple hours of sleep this morning haha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think I'm going to pick this phone up though. I'll just have to pick it up off-contract as I'm not due for an upgrade til August 2013. I was really surprised that the Sprint towers around me were getting NV/LTE ... so I've gotta test out that LTE. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even close. No handset is ever "future proof." Under the 18-24 month contract-subsidy system, by the time that you are eligible for a fully subsidized upgrade, no matter what handset you choose, it will be woefully outdated. A dozen years ago, I seriously thought that this would be just about the only cellphone that I would ever need. How naive was that?!

 

7wql7jr.jpg

 

AJ

 

Is that badboy rocking ICS yet?? :lol:

 

Any thoughts on the fingerprint attracting plastic surrounding the camera that I saw in a hands on demo?? Personally not an issue for me since I have used a silicon case to protect since my OG EVO...I'll take the added thickness since I've been known to drop a phone or two...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that badboy rocking ICS yet?? :lol:

 

Any thoughts on the fingerprint attracting plastic surrounding the camera that I saw in a hands on demo?? Personally not an issue for me since I have used a silicon case to protect since my OG EVO...I'll take the added thickness since I've been known to drop a phone or two...

 

Mine will be wraped with the Case-Mate Tough case more likely...thing lasted a long time on the 3D and been perfect so far. like it a lot better than the Seido Active case...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if the phone isn't enough as it is.....how bout EVO 3D LTE?.......

 

http://www.theverge....c-evo-3d-4g-lte

 

 

Pause it at 25sec mark....uh oh...

 

 

 

the video is really cool there, and very well the dual camera thing was just part of the design process and something they were toying around with during the development of the phone...as you can see int he video there are MANY different shades of the EVO 4G LTE...some had one camera with 2 LED's below 3D without the lower camera...

 

though they could have it ready to go, it could very well just of been something scratched through the process of development...ie they realized they couldn't' get the battery size they wanted or something else...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am curious about his impressions as well being that he is in so much love with that damn galaxy note, LOL.

lol

 

Leave my obssession with the Note out of this. :P

 

Ok, tried posted this earlier but got home late, got up too early and work as usual is making me work.

So without further ado, my view of the EVO HTC 4G LTE event.

 

TS out

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything looks really BA, but I sure hope that with the camera being raised like that, the glass is recessed. The way the 3D's camera was, if you didn't have a thick case on it, you could easily scratch the glass over the lens, gorilla glass or not. If it is as thin and light as the E4GT and has a unibody, any sales of E4GT will stop almost instantly when this is released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything looks really BA, but I sure hope that with the camera being raised like that, the glass is recessed. The way the 3D's camera was, if you didn't have a thick case on it, you could easily scratch the glass over the lens, gorilla glass or not. If it is as thin and light as the E4GT and has a unibody, any sales of E4GT will stop almost instantly when this is released.

 

if you look at all the pics its much more recessed than in the past so wouldn't worry about it too much...I ran mine without a case for a while 4G and 3D and never had a scratch on the lens. I beat the heck outa my phone too.

 

heres a pic kinda showing the more recessed protective lens and the actual camera below that. So if anything does somehow get down there the backing plastic part would be easy to replace out in store...

 

http://cdn.androidcentral.com/sites/androidcentral.com/files/articleimage/684/2012/03/evo-4g-lte/evo-4g-lte-6.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said before, my sources say that Sprint will not be using SIMs. Do people feel there is some benefit to SIMs?

 

Uh oh...Korey over at xda just mentioned the device has a Sina card for lte...the young kid is a sprint tech who does briefmobile.com too...

Said he's got an article on it coming soon.

 

He's been preaching simless lte from the get go...said its built in and only accessible VIA teardown...though still I'm surprised the number isn't listed on the sticker that lists your imei and sn...

 

 

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh oh...Korey over at xda just mentioned the device has a Sina card for lte...the young kid is a sprint tech who does briefmobile.com too...

Said he's got an article on it coming soon.

 

He's been preaching simless lte from the get go...said its built in and only accessible VIA teardown...though still I'm surprised the number isn't listed on the sticker that lists your imei and sn...

 

 

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

 

I've been seeing SIM references in lab docs for awhile. :)

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I've been seeing SIM references in lab docs for awhile.

 

Robert

 

oh now you tell us. LOL

 

Still I think its odd they wouldn't have the SIM ID listed on the sticker...no?

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been preaching simless lte from the get go...said its built in and only accessible VIA teardown...though still I'm surprised the number isn't listed on the sticker that lists your imei and sn...

 

The ICCID (SIM) number is actually visible on some of the pictures from the event that show the microSD slot; it's the bottom number w/barcode of the three, below the MEIDs, on the sticker.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The ICCID (SIM) number is actually visible on some of the pictures from the event that show the microSD slot; it's the bottom number w/barcode of the three, below the MEIDs, on the sticker.

 

 

Ugh facepalm.........been starring at it the whole time LOL. Never put 2+2 together there....LOL DOH!

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Quote from wsj; "The T-Mobile deal could be reached as soon as later this month, while discussions with Verizon on a separate transaction are expected to take longer or might not result in an agreement, the people said." "The rising value of wireless licenses is a driving force behind the deal. U.S. Cellular’s spectrum portfolio touches 30 states and covers about 51 million people, according to regulatory filings." https://specmap.sequence-omega.net/
    • From WSJ which is paywalled but they're reporting that T-Mobile and Verizon are working on a joint deal to buy and split up U.S. Cellular. https://www.wsj.com/business/telecom/t-mobile-verizon-in-talks-to-carve-up-u-s-cellular-46d1e5e6?st=qwngrnh4s3bcr76 — — — — —  Summary from a user in the Reddit thread:  
    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...