Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note Edge User Thread


COZisBack

Recommended Posts

Y3mHipF.png?1
Model: SM-N915P
Processor: 2.7 GHz Quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084
Display: Curved Quad HD Super AMOLED

  • 5.6 inches / 1440 x 2560 / 524 PPI
  • wWlgucu.jpg?1

Sprint Cellular Bands:

  • CDMA EV-DO Rev. A (800, 1900 MHz)
  • FDD-LTE (Bands 25, 26)
  • TD-LTE (Bands 41)

Wireless:

  • 802.11a/b/g/n Wi-Fi
  • Bluetooth 4.1 wireless technology
  • NFC

Notes:

  • Sprint Band 41 Carrier Aggregation
  • Sprint Spark
  • Sprint Direct Connect Now
  • HD Voice
  • Wi-Fi Calling
  • Not Fully CCA/RRPP Compliant
  • Currently no Sprint VoLTE capabilities
  • No SVLTE (Spark devices don't support SVLTE)
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ok, so far 3 days with this device.

 

I held it and played with it in Best Buy last month, which made me want it. But using it as a daily driver for the last two days is a totally difference experience. I liked it back then and and I am in love with it now. Yes, it's expensive and yes, it's a bit wider than my Note 4 (which I still love too). But it is still less wider than my Mega and (i assume the Nexus 6 which I still haven't taken out of the UPS box). Granted the Note Edge is not for everyone, be it size, Touchwiz, the  curved edge, etc.

 

Much like the Note 4, I had to re-provision the device since it refused to get a signal at all. Actually before that I couldn't even sign on to Google since I swapped my Mega for it and I have that darn 2 step verification and it kept sending the code to the device I just swapped from. lol

The Edge seems as fluid as my Note 4, feels better in the hand due to the curve in both naked (no cover) and with the cover. Speaking of cover, I had to go to the death star to get a cover for it. Since it's an official OEM Edge cover, it didn't have the AT&T branding thankfully.

I received it Wed and after the provisioning, it received my home site signals very well. Thursday at work, it couldn't grab on to the signal, but neither did my Note 4. They both kept dropping in and out of LTE. By the end of the day, seems everything was fine and both stayed on LTE. 

 

I took both Notes into Manhattan today (Friday) and both grabbed onto the signal fine. Except when I was in the Museum (i put them both on wi-fi at that point). In Wi-fi it seems the Note Edge found the signal faster than the Note 4.

Back home I took a screen shot tonight of both the Note and Edge after installing SignalCheck Pro. . 

Screenshot_2014-11-21-22-small.png

 

Since the Sprint Note Edge does not have an official Root process yet and I refuse to use the T-Mobile one that some are saying works, The app doesn't reset on the Edge since it needs root, but so far I haven't had a problem with the Edge getting a signal.

Then again, I don't have the technical know how or apps/devices that can do a thorough diagnostic for comparison purposes.  

 

Battery life is a totally different issue. It does seem to drain faster than the Note 4. But since I am always plugging in my devices (in car, work, home,etc) I am rarely in a situation that I am running out of juice. I may do a battery drain test tomorrow to confirm my suspicions. 

 

Although I am a right handed, I hold my devices for the most part with my left hand. But for the Note Edge it feels great in either hand. using my right hand and I can flip through the edge panels. using my left hand i can enable the Rotate 180 degree feature and flip the device upside down. 

 

Settings for the most part are the same, the only differences are as follows...

1-In the Device section, there is now a Edge Screen selection.

Screenshot_2014-11-21-23-1-small.png

 

2-In the System section, under Accessories, the Note 4 has a S View Cover sub-section and the Edge has a Flip Wallet section.

Screenshot_2014-11-21-23-2-small.png

 

3-In the drop down Notification panel settings selection, there are quite a few buttons not available on the Note Edge for some reason. 

First part (upper section) is the same buttons.

Screenshot_2014-11-21-23-3-small.png

But that is is for the Note Edge, The Note 4 has more buttons. 

Screenshot_2014-11-21-23-4-small.png

Now I have to wait for Root to determine if that is due to an app I installed on the Note 4 like Wanam exposed or not.

 

Well that's it for now. I'll report something else if I notice anything different.

 

TS out

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Ok, so far 3 days with this device.

 

I held it and played with it in Best Buy last month, which made me want it. But using it as a daily driver for the last two days is a totally difference experience...

Excellent write up. I have been intrigued with the Note Edge. I appreciated reading your perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK Edge users, you have the opportunity to show the first 80mbps+ speed test with CA on B41! :)  No pressure!

 

Probably not even turned on yet at the tower level anywhere.

 

I thought the Edge lacked CA? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so far 3 days with this device.

 

I held it and played with it in Best Buy last month, which made me want it. But using it as a daily driver for the last two days is a totally difference experience. I liked it back then and and I am in love with it now. Yes, it's expensive and yes, it's a bit wider than my Note 4 (which I still love too). But it is still less wider than my Mega and (i assume the Nexus 6 which I still haven't taken out of the UPS box). Granted the Note Edge is not for everyone, be it size, Touchwiz, the  curved edge, etc.

 

Much like the Note 4, I had to re-provision the device since it refused to get a signal at all. Actually before that I couldn't even sign on to Google since I swapped my Mega for it and I have that darn 2 step verification and it kept sending the code to the device I just swapped from. lol

The Edge seems as fluid as my Note 4, feels better in the hand due to the curve in both naked (no cover) and with the cover. Speaking of cover, I had to go to the death star to get a cover for it. Since it's an official OEM Edge cover, it didn't have the AT&T branding thankfully.

I received it Wed and after the provisioning, it received my home site signals very well. Thursday at work, it couldn't grab on to the signal, but neither did my Note 4. They both kept dropping in and out of LTE. By the end of the day, seems everything was fine and both stayed on LTE. 

 

I took both Notes into Manhattan today (Friday) and both grabbed onto the signal fine. Except when I was in the Museum (i put them both on wi-fi at that point). In Wi-fi it seems the Note Edge found the signal faster than the Note 4.

Back home I took a screen shot tonight of both the Note and Edge after installing SignalCheck Pro. . 

 

 

Since the Sprint Note Edge does not have an official Root process yet and I refuse to use the T-Mobile one that some are saying works, The app doesn't reset on the Edge since it needs root, but so far I haven't had a problem with the Edge getting a signal.

Then again, I don't have the technical know how or apps/devices that can do a thorough diagnostic for comparison purposes.  

 

Battery life is a totally different issue. It does seem to drain faster than the Note 4. But since I am always plugging in my devices (in car, work, home,etc) I am rarely in a situation that I am running out of juice. I may do a battery drain test tomorrow to confirm my suspicions. 

 

Although I am a right handed, I hold my devices for the most part with my left hand. But for the Note Edge it feels great in either hand. using my right hand and I can flip through the edge panels. using my left hand i can enable the Rotate 180 degree feature and flip the device upside down. 

 

Settings for the most part are the same, the only differences are as follows...

1-In the Device section, there is now a Edge Screen selection.

 

 

2-In the System section, under Accessories, the Note 4 has a S View Cover sub-section and the Edge has a Flip Wallet section.

 

 

3-In the drop down Notification panel settings selection, there are quite a few buttons not available on the Note Edge for some reason. 

First part (upper section) is the same buttons.

 

But that is is for the Note Edge, The Note 4 has more buttons. 

 

Now I have to wait for Root to determine if that is due to an app I installed on the Note 4 like Wanam exposed or not.

 

Well that's it for now. I'll report something else if I notice anything different.

 

TS out

 

Does Download Booster actually work on the Sprint Note Edge????  I was wondering if they have incorporated it back into the phone or not.  I see it in your picture as one of the icons.  So I just wonder if it works or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Download Booster actually work on the Sprint Note Edge????  I was wondering if they have incorporated it back into the phone or not.  I see it in your picture as one of the icons.  So I just wonder if it works or not.

The images I posted above are in order of Note 4 to the left and Note Edge to the right, that last image is of the Note 4 showing the additional setting buttons that it has. The Note Edge don't have them, to which to answer your question, there is no Download booster setting for the Note Edge..

 

I still do not know why there are less notifications panel setting buttons for the Edge, when it is basically is the Note 4 application wise. 

 

TS

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what day will the phone be available in stores? I want to get one next week with easy pay.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

I was at a corporate store today and they had one on display... didn't ask if they had any in stock though. I would assume that if they have it on display that they have/had some in stock.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no doubt the Edge is designed for B41.  But how is the real world performance on B25 LTE?  If you look at my chart from FCC data, the max EIRP data for B25 is 23% less for B25 than a LG G2. The other bands are also down somewhat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no doubt the Edge is designed for B41.  But how is the real world performance on B25 LTE?  If you look at my chart from FCC data, the max EIRP data for B25 is 23% less for B25 than a LG G2. The other bands are also down somewhat.

I posted a few SignalCheck Pro screenshots comparisons of the Nexus 6, Note 4, Mega and Edge over in the Nexus thread here.

 

TS

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at my chart from FCC data, the max EIRP data for B25 is 23% less for B25 than a LG G2. The other bands are also down somewhat.

 

Your calculations are way off.  Decibels are logarithmic -- you cannot calculate percentages as if the figures were linear.  For example, any 3 dB decrease is a 50 percent decrease.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your calculations are way off.  Decibels are logarithmic -- you cannot calculate percentages as if the figures were linear.  For example, any 3 dB decrease is a 50 percent decrease.

 

AJ

 

This makes the real world results shown by twospirits above even more interesting.  Based on lab tests (generalized), the Note Edge's B25 LTE performance should have been notably lower, but is on par:

 

Band 25 EIRP Maximum Lab Tests versus twospirits Real World

 

Phone        B25 EIRP Max    B25 RSRP #1   B25 RSRP #2

Note 4          22.45           -82           -84                

Note Edge       18.50           -80           -82

Nexus 6         22.92           -82           -83

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This makes the real world results shown by twospirits above even more interesting. Based on lab tests (generalized), the Note Edge's B25 LTE performance should have been notably lower, but is on par:

 

Band 25 EIRP Maximum Lab Tests versus twospirits Real World

 

Phone B25 EIRP Max B25 RSRP #1 B25 RSRP #2

Note 4 22.45 -82 -84

Note Edge 18.50 -80 -82

Nexus 6 22.92 -82 -83

Isn't the Edge using a different tower because the GCI value is different?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't the Edge using a different tower because the GCI value is different?

Here are the two photos used:

http://santafemods.com/Forum/s4gru/Screenshots/Nexus6/Mega-Note4-Edge-Nexus6-4.png

http://santafemods.com/Forum/s4gru/Screenshots/Nexus6/Mega-Note4-Edge-Nexus6-5.png

Further into the photos the same site sector changes to 1A indicating B26.  Thus these are all B25 from the same site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This makes the real world results shown by twospirits above even more interesting.  Based on lab tests (generalized), the Note Edge's B25 LTE performance should have been notably lower, but is on par:

 

Your informal comparison is running into problems again because you are conflating two different things:  EIRP and RSRP.  The former is transmitted power, the latter received power.  For regulation purposes, the FCC is concerned with only transmission, not reception.  So, all FCC OET published test results are for transmission.  We do not routinely get test results for reception -- other than anecdotal reports, such as twospirits' observations.

 

But the gist of it is this:  transmission performance does not necessarily correlate with reception performance -- and vice versa.  Compared to a superior transmitter, a poor/average transmitter may exhibit little, if any difference in reception.  And the two different devices may perform much the same in strong signal areas.  For reference, twospirits had very strong band 25 signal across his tests.  However, in weak signal areas, that poor/average transmitter more quickly will run out of power on the uplink.  In such cases, downlink reception is irrelevant, and the link will fail, dropping to EV-DO, CDMA1X, roaming service, or no service in more locations.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

btw, those test results were from my home, at work its a different story.  :wall: 

 

But the gist of it is this:  transmission performance does not necessarily correlate with reception performance -- and vice versa.  Compared to a superior transmitter, a poor/average transmitter may exhibit little, if any difference in reception.  And the two different devices may perform much the same in strong signal areas.  For reference, twospirits had very strong band 25 signal across his tests.  However, in weak signal areas, that poor/average transmitter more quickly will run out of power on the uplink.  In such cases, downlink reception is irrelevant, and the link will fail, dropping to EV-DO, CDMA1X, roaming service, or no service in more locations.

 

AJ

 

hmmm with what you said above AJ, I would assume that the poor/average transmitter (here near my work) is being received well on the Note Edge (which stays on LTE, regardless of the band) and that my Note 4 continues to refuse to stay on LTE and drops down to eHRPD.

That seems to be the only reason why the Note 4 refuses to grab on to a LTE signal. Unless the Note 4 is a dud and needs to be replace. aarrgghh.

 

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmmm with what you said above AJ, I would assume that the poor/average transmitter (here near my work) is being received well on the Note Edge...

 

No, per its FCC OET published test results, the "poor/average transmitter" is the Galaxy Note Edge itself.  Did you take the "poor/average transmitter" to mean the serving cell site?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your informal comparison is running into problems again because you are conflating two different things:  EIRP and RSRP.  The former is transmitted power, the latter received power.  For regulation purposes, the FCC is concerned with only transmission, not reception.  So, all FCC OET published test results are for transmission.  We do not routinely get test results for reception -- other than anecdotal reports, such as twospirits' observations.

 

But the gist of it is this:  transmission performance does not necessarily correlate with reception performance -- and vice versa.  Compared to a superior transmitter, a poor/average transmitter may exhibit little, if any difference in reception.  And the two different devices may perform much the same in strong signal areas.  For reference, twospirits had very strong band 25 signal across his tests.  However, in weak signal areas, that poor/average transmitter more quickly will run out of power on the uplink.  In such cases, downlink reception is irrelevant, and the link will fail, dropping to EV-DO, CDMA1X, roaming service, or no service in more locations.

 

AJ

 

Thank you for your well written, concise, and informative clarification. You are correct that I was assuming a high correlation between transmission and reception performance, given today's use of standardized modems.  The possibility of the transmission and reception being out of "sync" with each other raises interesting possibilities for bad design/marketing deception.  Having purchased boosters in the past, I was aware of the importance of uplink power.  A very good description of weak uplink issues. Thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, per its FCC OET published test results, the "poor/average transmitter" is the Galaxy Note Edge itself.  Did you take the "poor/average transmitter" to mean the serving cell site?

 

AJ

Yes I the village idiot did take that to mean the serving cell site. lol

I really need to slow down on my Evelyn Wood speed reading.  :D

Thanks for the clarification.

 

I played with this phone at best buy. It's so pretty lol. The screen looks amazing

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 on Crapatalk

It's funny, but my niece says the same thing. Must be something an iPhone user would say.  :P

but yeah it is pretty darn gorgeous. No gaps, nice curves, nice to hold, responsive to my touch and yes I am talking about the phone. lol

 

TS

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really need to slow down on my Evelyn Wood speed reading.  :D

 

Maybe you signed up for the Evelyn Ashford speed running course by mistake.  That could explain why you are so out of sync and your grades so bad.

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...