Jump to content

iPhone 6 omnibus thread


sbolen

Recommended Posts

iphone-6-all-2.jpg

Above: a mockup of an iPhone 5S, iPhone 6 (4.7"), iPhone 6 (5.5"), and Current iPad Mini

 

All aboard the leaked parts rumor train! Here's a thread to post what you find/what's leaked, etc. As more details come forward closer to launch, I'll edit/update this post with the relevant information and link it to replies to this topic.

 

I think it would be a lot easier to contain everything relating to the new iPhone 6 ("iPhone Air"?) in one central location. B)

 

iPhone 6 Omnibus Thread Topics

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were early rumors of only the larger 5.5" iPhone 6 model getting a sapphire crystal display... but a wild video appears:

 

If the 4.7" iPhone 6 has a Sapphire display, I'm selling my iPhone 5S outright to get one shortly after launch. I love the sapphire crystal domes on my nicer watches, so I'm really pumped to see what it looks like on top of a retina display.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never having to worry about a cracked screen.... That would be amazing. I would consider selling my 5s and getting the 6 if it does have a sapphire crystal screen. And if I can't afford it, I'll just be very upset each day I can't afford it until February lol.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never having to worry about a cracked screen.... That would be amazing. I would consider selling my 5s and getting the 6 if it does have a sapphire crystal screen. And if I can't afford it, I'll just be very upset each day I can't afford it until February lol.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's the scratches that are killing me. I have one from a rivet on my jeans in the top third of the display that drives me slowly insane. I have AppleCare+ on the phone, so I may swallow the $50 closer to the launch of the new phones to boost my trade in/resale value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

February :(. I might do easy pay for this phone if it proves worth it. I don't want too. But I also can't buy a phone full retail right now. AGH

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

February :(. I might do easy pay for this phone if it proves worth it. I don't want too. But I also can't buy a phone full retail right now. AGH

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's why I always have two newer phones. To use one while I'm selling the other to pay for the next device. :)
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I always have two newer phones. To use one while I'm selling the other to pay for the next device. :)

 

The Robert M. Herron Museum of Modern Cellphones cannot comprehend phone sales.  You are giving up technological works of art.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I always have two newer phones. To use one while I'm selling the other to pay for the next device. :)

I usually finance the full retail price every other year on a Barclaycard Apple 0% financing option - last year I sold my iPhone 4S outright and paid the difference on the carrier subsidy price (to net the 64GB size).

 

This year, it's full retail (financed), and a lump payment to Barclaycard once I sell the 5S. Split over 12 months with that actual trade-in/Craigslist/eBay cash, it's still not that bad.

 

My wife hates it. Lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But what about the band support?

 

*Sits back, watches flame war erupt*

I could probably guarantee Band 41 support, but probably not carrier aggregation. We'll leave that to the Android devices so that I'm envious of them for yet another year...  <_<

 

-Anthony

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could probably guarantee Band 41 support, but probably not carrier aggregation. We'll leave that to the Android devices so that I'm envious of them for yet another year... <_<

 

-Anthony

I'm betting on both. One thing Apple excels at is LTE band support, and I can definitely see them implementing CA. The technology is available.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MDM 9x35 chipset it is a Category 6 part capable of 300 Mbps on the downlink and 50 Mbps on uplink. Getting to 300 Mbps of downstream throughput requires aggregation of two 20 MHz wide LTE carriers. If Apple uses this part and it is widely available, then it  will be capable of CA. If not, then not, I guess not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm betting on both. One thing Apple excels at is LTE band support, and I can definitely see them implementing CA. The technology is available.

 

I'll take that bet on CA. Band 41 was available when the iPhone 5s was released and well.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

http://tktechnewsblog.wordpress.com/2014/07/08/exclusive-first-images-of-iwatch-prototype-designer-emerge-with-display-on/

 

Someone is trying to make a name for himself this year.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Dead link. And what was that picture taken with? A potato?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dead link. And what was that picture taken with? A potato?

He took it down between the time I posted it and now. I knew he was going overboard.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He took it down between the time I posted it and now. I knew he was going overboard.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

I take anything he says with a semi truckload full of salt. He hates sprint. I once commented on his video about the 5% throttling and he argued with me and told me it was all customers that would be throttled whenever sprint wants too because sprint's network sucks. If he is trying to make something of himself, he's doing a really bad job at it. Providing unconvincing false information. Uh what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are so many rumors out there, it is hard to know what is truth and what is not.  A couple of thoughts:

 

All three bands being supported, I would have to say yes.  Apple would shoot themselves in the foot if the iPhone 6 did not support all three.  There are so many people awaiting the release. Samsung's sales are poor right now for the S5 due to people waiting for the release of the next iPhone.  If the i6 is a home run, Samsung will lose a fair amount of market share.

 

I will say that I am going to purchase the 5.5" 6 due to the amount of documents I have to read through for work.  I also hope that if the rumor of the larger i6 having128GB of memory is true also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone is trying to make a name for himself this year.

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

He also posted this gem: http://tktechnewsblog.wordpress.com/2014/07/08/sprint-bends-customers-over-again-welcome-to-tiered-data-plans/

 

Speculate much? Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm betting on both. One thing Apple excels at is LTE band support, and I can definitely see them implementing CA. The technology is available.

MDM 9x35 chipset it is a Category 6 part capable of 300 Mbps on the downlink and 50 Mbps on uplink. Getting to 300 Mbps of downstream throughput requires aggregation of two 20 MHz wide LTE carriers. If Apple uses this part and it is widely available, then it  will be capable of CA. If not, then not, I guess not...

I'll take that bet on CA. Band 41 was available when the iPhone 5s was released and well.....

 

I will take that bet.  iPhone 6 will support carrier aggregation -- for AT&T, not for Sprint.

 

iPhone 6 was certainly in development, maybe even in production, before the category 6 MDM9635 became widely available.  So, like last year when Apple used the category 3 MDM9615 for the second year in a row, it will be about a year behind the curve on the latest baseband, going with the category 4 MDM9625 this year.  That will limit LTE bandwidth to a maximum of 20 MHz FDD/TDD.  Carrier aggregation will be possible only in combinations that sum to 20 MHz FDD/TDD or less -- such as the band 17 + band 4 configuration that AT&T is using in Chicago, etc.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will take that bet.  iPhone 6 will support carrier aggregation -- for AT&T, not for Sprint.

 

iPhone 6 was certainly in development, maybe even in production, before the category 6 MDM9635 became widely available.  So, like last year when Apple used the category 3 MDM9615 for the second year in a row, it will be about a year behind the curve on the latest baseband, going with the category 4 MDM9625 this year.  That will limit LTE bandwidth to a maximum of 20 MHz FDD/TDD.  Carrier aggregation will be possible only in combinations that sum to 20 MHz FDD/TDD or less -- such as the band 17 + band 4 configuration that AT&T is using in Chicago, etc.

 

AJ

 

You might be right, AJ. We will see. But 9635 samples have been floating around since last year. Now, can they produce enough for Apple's needs? Who are the target carriers? Does China Mobile, Softbank and Sprint add up to enough iPhones for Apple to place a large enough order for 9635s? Or does everybody get 9625s? None of the other US carriers need a 20+20 CA except Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see Apple segregating the two versions with the 4.7" getting the 9625 and the 5.5" getting the 9635. Same segmentation strategy as the S5 Prime and the One M8 Prime. Here is a discussion of the S5 Prime:

 

http://www.zdnet.com/samsung-galaxy-s5-prime-to-support-225-mbps-download-7000029652/

 

BTW, the 9635 was released last November. The iPhones usually go into production couple of months before introduction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Video is not playing anymore. Maybe apple had it removed because it's a legit leak.

I wouldn't hold it past Apple.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
    • It took NINE MONTHS for contractors to replace the traffic light pole they took down for this, but Verizon contractors finally returned to install an oDAS unit in Downtown Brooklyn. I only saw it in the states of having no antennas and then mmWave antenna, so I'm not sure if they added more on top. I'm once again very confused by the placement of this site since it's on the same block as a macro site with mmWave, and standing in this position I can get 2.5Gbps download speeds. What is Verizon doing?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...