Jump to content

Sprint announces more small LTE cities


marioc21

Recommended Posts

Sprint just announced more LTE cities. Small ones, but more is better than none.

  • Lawrence, KS
  • Topeka, KS
  • Wichita, KS
  • Waukegan-Lake County, IL
  • Barnstable-Hyannis/Mid-Cape, MA

Press release: http://newsroom.sprint.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=2395

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice how they don't even mention the EVO anymore for LTE?

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

Excellent catch, not encouraging at all for my EVOLTE. Sad really that Sprints first flagship phone line that was actually worthy of the term flagship has been reduced to stepchild status. I wonder if there is a hardware issue similar to the One X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, they also don't mention it on their website as one of the "Showcase" phones. Only phones there are GSIII and the Photon Q.

 

I've been gunshy about the EVO LTE and I guess this just confirms my worries. Man, I really liked that phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice how they don't even mention the EVO anymore for LTE?

Excellent catch, not encouraging at all for my EVOLTE.

I've been gunshy about the EVO LTE and I guess this just confirms my worries. Man, I really liked that phone.

 

The EVO LTE is not for everyone. It is the LTE experts' phone. Like a sports car with a stick shift, you gotta know how to drive it.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw on another site where someone was ripping Sprint pretty saying that there was no LTE in Atlanta. Someone tried to explain to him that the problem, at least in part, likely was his Evo LTE. He wasn't trying to hear it though and ported to t-mobile. HTC really needs to get the Evo LTE sorted out or else Sprint should consider pulling it. It's making Sprint look bad and they certainly don't need any more help in that regard.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The EVO LTE is not for everyone. It is the LTE experts' phone. Like a sports car with a stick shift, you gotta know how to drive it.

 

AJ

 

Seems to me more like a jaguar. You need a second to drive around while one is in the shop.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me more like a jaguar. You need a second to drive around while one is in the shop.

 

Hah that reminds of the mad men episodes where they were trying to get jaguar as a client

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The EVO LTE is not for everyone. It is the LTE experts' phone. Like a sports car with a stick shift, you gotta know how to drive it.

 

AJ

 

I feel ya... but it just doesn't seem worth it unless maybe the phone was free to start with. A sports car with stick shift has advantages over an automatic. What advantages does having to mess with the LTE settings have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 2009 minted old stable rule to "never buy htc again" hasnt failed me yet and still works out to my advantage.

 

Loving these press releases from sprint. The other carriers have announced tiny towns and communities in "running list" order, so regardless of size, this is no different. Verizon announced its first lte city in my state last year. It was canton , mississippi... a town of 13,000 people

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice how they don't even mention the EVO anymore for LTE?

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

Anyone notice they didn't mention any device older than the GS3. They dropped LG & the tri-band modem. It appears they are permoting their new devices with their new cities.

 

Sent from my EVO using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon announced its first lte city in my state last year. It was canton , mississippi... a town of 13,000 people

 

Maybe actor Kiefer Sutherland said, "You tell them boys we need some LTE down here in Canton."

 

(Now, will anyone at all recognize this obscure reference?)

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 2009 minted old stable rule to "never buy htc again" hasnt failed me yet and still works out to my advantage.

 

Loving these press releases from sprint. The other carriers have announced tiny towns and communities in "running list" order, so regardless of size, this is no different. Verizon announced its first lte city in my state last year. It was canton , mississippi... a town of 13,000 people

 

And I went with the don't get burned by Samsung rule this time after the Epic4g GPS and radio train wreck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And I went with the don't get burned by Samsung rule this time after the Epic4g GPS and radio train wreck.

 

Good point.

 

Samsung did resolve the gps issues with the 3 (at least best i can tell) ... i find fault in my initial statement however since lte connectivity is a mute point in my city/ state for the majority of my upgrade cycle anyway. Either would have served me well while in ole dirty.

 

Pardon my thread hijack :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I went with the don't get burned by Samsung rule this time after the Epic4g GPS and radio train wreck.

 

They finally fixed that ordeal with the GS3. The GPS on the GS3 is about the best of any device I've ever used. Locks very fast and almost always with 10+ sats. My GS2, on the other hand, is a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice how they don't even mention the EVO anymore for LTE?

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

I am willing to bet that the EVO line ends here and now with the EVO LTE. I think the next HTC phone on Sprint will be a new flagship model under the standard name like Samsung did this year with the Galaxy series. I went by the same thing you did as everyone I know who has had Samsung Android phones in the past has been burned bad from GPS, radio issues and to some never getting basic updates. Now Samsung decides to turn it all around. I blame HTC for not doing more as they should have Jelly Bean out already for the HOX line and descendants. That would have been the deciding factor and would have given them an edge against Samsung, which technically has better hardware (specs). But now Samsung is already releasing Jelly Bean when there hasn't been word one on the issue from HTC. My next phone will probably end up being a Samsung. If I start having issues with the LTE I will probably go to the Note 2. Sad as I really love HTC products.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Htc said jb for one series next Month. So hopefully Evo gets it late oct/nov

I don't believe that actually came from HTC. If I remember correctly that was an insider who said that was the plan he thinks. It doesn't matter now as Samsung has almost beat them to the line. They need to release something to let users know they mean business.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...