Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Missouri Market (includes St. Louis)


riddlebox

Recommended Posts

I couldn't see any evidence of recently-disturbed ground, though.  Do they run fiber to every single site, I guess?

 

There has to be existing backhaul of some type there, whether fiber, microwave, or copper wire, if there is existing copper then there is existing conduit, and all they have to do pull new fiber in the existing conduit.  We do it all the time in traffic signal design, we replace existing 7-wire or twisted pair interconnect with fiber using the existing conduits.  They should be able to put the fiber lines in the conduit and keep the existing copper in place to keep the legacy equipment up and running. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed as I was driving home on 70 this evening, that it looked like the tower at 70 & Bercher looked like it had RRUs up on the rack.  My phone never showed 4G however.  I will try to get a look at that tower tomorrow on my way home again, unless anyone can beat me to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed as I was driving home on 70 this evening, that it looked like the tower at 70 & Bercher looked like it had RRUs up on the rack.  My phone never showed 4G however.  I will try to get a look at that tower tomorrow on my way home again, unless anyone can beat me to it.

Top or bottom rack?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was the bottom rack, but I'm not positive.  Just happened to see it while driving past on 70. 

Just looked at the street view of that site. Bottom rack is most likely sprint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nowhere even remotely close. 10 miles apart.

 

Looks about the same distance as the columbia/255 blips from telegraph.

 

But hey, I hope it's a new tower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks about the same distance as the columbia/255 blips from telegraph.

 

But hey, I hope it's a new tower.

Just got 4G on Main St in Alton. I will try to check it out during Lunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

speaking of distance, I know if varies depending on frequency, terrain & line of site but does anyone know the rough distance to expect for a Sprint cell site?

It all depends on the site. Could be 1 mile. Could be 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

speaking of distance, I know if varies depending on frequency, terrain & line of site but does anyone know the rough distance to expect for a Sprint cell site?

 

2 blocks to 10 miles. There really is no such thing as a typical rough distance. For the reasons you cite, and more. What height are the antennas mounted? What is the downtilt of the panels? Where is the device in relation to the panels? Are there RF shadows caused by large buildings, hills or mountains?

 

Every cell is specifically designed to cover an area. Very few cells are full sized at 5-10 miles. Most are engineered to be much smaller to provide a better signal and capacity in denser areas.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 blocks to 10 miles. There really is no such thing as a typical rough distance. For the reasons you cite, and more. What height are the antennas mounted? What is the downtilt of the panels? Where is the device in relation to the panels? Are there RF shadows caused by large buildings, hills or mountains?

 

Every cell is specifically designed to cover an area. Very few cells are full sized at 5-10 miles. Most are engineered to be much smaller to provide a better signal and capacity in denser areas.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

That said, could the extremely high and rising floodwaters in the Mississippi and Missouri rivers make the signal travel further?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That said, could the extremely high and rising floodwaters in the Mississippi and Missouri rivers make the signal travel further?

 

That's a good little stretch there...  fog will affect it more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 blocks to 10 miles. There really is no such thing as a typical rough distance. For the reasons you cite, and more. What height are the antennas mounted? What is the downtilt of the panels? Where is the device in relation to the panels? Are there RF shadows caused by large buildings, hills or mountains?

 

Every cell is specifically designed to cover an area. Very few cells are full sized at 5-10 miles. Most are engineered to be much smaller to provide a better signal and capacity in denser areas.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

The tower I get a signal off of in St Peters has a weak signal. I don't get a signal at all in my basement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

2 blocks to 10 miles. There really is no such thing as a typical rough distance. For the reasons you cite, and more. What height are the antennas mounted? What is the downtilt of the panels? Where is the device in relation to the panels? Are there RF shadows caused by large buildings, hills or mountains?

 

 

Every cell is specifically designed to cover an area. Very few cells are full sized at 5-10 miles. Most are engineered to be much smaller to provide a better signal and capacity in denser areas.

 

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

The tower I get a signal off of in St Peters has a weak signal. I don't get a signal at all in my basement.

4G?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The connection I got in Alton this morning is definitely fringe connecton from 270 and Riverview...went down there again signal was between -108 and -120 and Serving cell stayed on 138... mapped a couple points....I know I'm not supposed to with my GNex but I just had to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...