Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Missouri Market (includes St. Louis)

riddlebox

By riddlebox
in Markets

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

lilg740
lilg740

Just got this in my email. This is in St. Louis. Band 41.

lilg740
lilg740

Thanks to the selflessness of one of our members I now have a new shiny HTC ONE to play with! I am speechless! Its only a loaner but this is amazing!

sbolen
sbolen

Last night I had the Mifi at Urban Chestnut for an event and was pulling crazy good Band 41 LTE. I was feeling cocky, so I challenged friends with a Verizon phone & AT&T phone to a speedtest.

Posted Images

Flompholph Member Level: 4G WiMax

Flompholph

Posted
Posted

I've been all over St Charles county the last couple days, would that show up in the signal check pro logs?

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Yes the provider column will show "Sprint B25??". "??" is just google not understanding superscript 2. With some work you can import into Fusion tables then filter to show second carrier. The little bit of work is changing Strongest_latitude and Strongest_longitude to latitude and longitude because fusion needs location data to plot points. Just a tip it is easier to change them before you import. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dkoellerwx Member Level: LTE Advanced

Dkoellerwx

Posted
Posted

Yes the provider column will show "Sprint B25??". "??" is just google not understanding superscript 2. With some work you can import into Fusion tables then filter to show second carrier. The little bit of work is changing Strongest_latitude and Strongest_longitude to latitude and longitude because fusion needs location data to plot points. Just a tip it is easier to change them before you import.

What are you opening the logs with? Shows in mine as Sprint B25Ä2.

 

Sent from my LG G4

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dkoellerwx Member Level: LTE Advanced

Dkoellerwx

Posted
Posted

Google sheets uses ??. Not that it matters it will show Sprint B25 then something. I think excel can identify it correctly.

Weird. I open with Google Sheets and get Ä2. Open on the computer rather than my phone if that makes a difference. Just odd the difference. Doesn't really matter.

 

Sent from my LG G4

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EvanA Member Level: 4G WiMax

EvanA

Posted
Posted

Cool. Glad to see the better performance.

 

Edit: Is second carrier live? That could also account for the difference.

Yep 2nd carrier live as well. This sector was never hurting for performance though. It faces a lightly populated area.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

Pretty good speeds on the new bridge in Chesterfield.

 

Check out my Ookla Speedtest result. What's your speed? http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/1626231366

Maybe we do have Nexus 6P Carrier Aggregation confirmed after all? It'd be nice if it had Engineering screens, though that showed it.

 

Sent from OnePlus 2 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cardsfan96 Member Level: 3G EVDO

Cardsfan96

Posted
Posted

Maybe we do have Nexus 6P Carrier Aggregation confirmed after all? It'd be nice if it had Engineering screens, though that showed it.

 

Sent from OnePlus 2 using Tapatalk

Are the clearwire sites with 2 carriers able to do carried aggregation in stl?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dkoellerwx Member Level: LTE Advanced

Dkoellerwx

Posted
Posted

Maybe we do have Nexus 6P Carrier Aggregation confirmed after all? It'd be nice if it had Engineering screens, though that showed it.

 

Sent from OnePlus 2 using Tapatalk

I think it was the Moto X (pure?) that we haven't been able to confirm CA with.

 

Sent from my LG G4

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Pretty good speeds on the new bridge in Chesterfield.

 

Check out my Ookla Speedtest result. What's your speed? http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/1626231366

 

You were speed testing while driving across the Missouri River bridge on I-64?  Somebody, alert the Missouri Highway Patrol.  We have an inattentive driver.  Not to mention, you were speed testing.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

I think it was the Moto X (pure?) that we haven't been able to confirm CA with.

 

Sent from my LG G4

Yes, I know of the MXPE issue, but I recall some posts about concerns that possibly the N5X and N6P may not support CA also.

 

Sent from OnePlus 2 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dkoellerwx Member Level: LTE Advanced

Dkoellerwx

Posted
Posted

Yes, I know of the MXPE issue, but I recall some posts about concerns that possibly the N5X and N6P may not support CA also.

 

Sent from OnePlus 2 using Tapatalk

Oh. I didn't recall seeing that. There have been several 100+ speed tests from 6P and 5Xs, didn't know there was still concern.

 

Sent from my LG G4

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

Oh. I didn't recall seeing that. There have been several 100+ speed tests from 6P and 5Xs, didn't know there was still concern.

 

Sent from my LG G4

It's certainly possible that it was proven a long time ago, and I'm just late to the party. Wouldn't be the first time.

 

Sent from OnePlus 2 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Oh. I didn't recall seeing that. There have been several 100+ speed tests from 6P and 5Xs, didn't know there was still concern.

It's certainly possible that it was proven a long time ago, and I'm just late to the party. Wouldn't be the first time.

 

I like to plant seeds of doubt and uncertainty.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • mikejeep
      SignalCheck - Android app to monitor your Wi-Fi/2G/3G/4G LTE/5G-NR signal strengths

      By mikejeep · Posted

      After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • clbowens
      Galaxy S23

      By clbowens · Posted

      Oct security update is out.
    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • mikejeep
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mikejeep · Posted

      It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • mdob07
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mdob07 · Posted

      Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...