Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Missouri Market (includes St. Louis)


riddlebox

Recommended Posts

I had 3 bars LTE on the corner of 4th and chestnut downtown yesterday....anybody else picked this up?

This is most likely one of the newly accepted sites down there. Can you go to your field test mode and see if the Cell Identity is still there? Also if you get it again in that area or in any other non identified area please let us know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is most likely one of the newly accepted sites down there. Can you go to your field test mode and see if the Cell Identity is still there? Also if you get it again in that area or in any other non identified area please let us know.

I'm in edwardsville now, no luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What were you seeing?

A user who emails me got an SCID that should have been from a Creve Couer site but I guess there was another discrepency in the "cheat sheet". He got 05611D, which should have been Creve Couer Park, but it was actually the site downtown(site ID's are 173 and 174)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know which Building it is at Westport?

 

I thought this site was @ Creve Coeur Park?

 

I'm at Page & Ball Dr., so getting to Creve Coeur Park is pretty easy... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used the Sensorly "Map Trip" yesterday. I drove I-64 East from downtown to I-170 North to I-70 and according to this app I received ZERO 4G-LTE hits.

 

Sad.

 

I haven't checked the map to see if you SHOULD have gotten a LTE signal but if you just run sensorly on 'map trip' it will constantly be using data and therefore doesn't scan for 4G as well.  It will switch over when no data is being used a lot quicker than when constantly flowing (like using maps/sensorly/streaming audio/etc).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought this site was @ Creve Coeur Park?

 

I'm at Page & Ball Dr., so getting to Creve Coeur Park is pretty easy... 

The site lilg740 thought he needed checked out was at Creve Coeur Park.  I was wondering if you by chance new which building it is at Westport that has the Sprint Equipment on it.  our office is near Craig & Borman, just south of Westport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used the Sensorly "Map Trip" yesterday. I drove I-64 East from downtown to I-170 North to I-70 and according to this app I received ZERO 4G-LTE hits.

 

Sad.

If you were downtown and were heading east, you would have went into Illinois  :P. Anyways, you should have connected at least at 170 and 64 and again a little north of there. Please verify that you have your phone set to LTE/CDMA and have eHRPD enabled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW: A lone True North tech is working on something in the cabinets at site near 94 thats in progress in Cottleville.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you were downtown and were heading east, you would have went into Illinois  :P. Anyways, you should have connected at least at 170 and 64 and again a little north of there. Please verify that you have your phone set to LTE/CDMA and have eHRPD enabled.

 

Oops.. yes, I was headed WEST! I am not sure what or where eHRPD is located but LTE/CDMA is enabled

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops.. yes, I was headed WEST! I am not sure what or where eHRPD is located but LTE/CDMA is enabled

Go to Settings, About Phone, Status. If under Network type it reads eHRPD you are fine. Anything else, let me know and I will assist you further.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go to Settings, About Phone, Status. If under Network type it reads eHRPD you are fine. Anything else, let me know and I will assist you further.

 

That too is enabled.

 

I just drove from 170 to 70 on the Rock Road, nothing. I then took 270 to South County. Finally at 270 and Gravois I started getting 4G/LTE.

 

If the roll out is this slow, I would think it may be a few years before we get full coverage. This is absolutly atrocious.

 

Sprint is screwing us over. We are paying for 4G speeds with these phones but the are delivering MUCH less.

 

Time to say fugg it and move on to Verizon. I would glady pay a bigger bill but at least i am getting what I am paying for!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That too is enabled.

 

I just drove from 170 to 70 on the Rock Road, nothing. I then took 270 to South County. Finally at 270 and Gravois I started getting 4G/LTE.

 

If the roll out is this slow, I would think it may be a few years before we get full coverage. This is absolutly atrocious.

 

Sprint is screwing us over. We are paying for 4G speeds with these phones but the are delivering MUCH less.

 

Time to say fugg it and move on to Verizon. I would glady pay a bigger bill but at least i am getting what I am paying for!!

If you want to rant about Sprint, this is not the place to do it. The rest of us are all waiting patiently for the rollout go be complete.

Now you are saying that you were mapping your trip with sensorly. If you are using data (sensorly does in fact use data when you are mapping a trip because it is uploading your 3g points that you are plotting. It is also loading the map.) you're phone will not switch to 4g (or at least has a very hard time). So it's not that there was no 4g coverage there, but your phone did not connect to it because it was being used.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That too is enabled.

 

I just drove from 170 to 70 on the Rock Road, nothing. I then took 270 to South County. Finally at 270 and Gravois I started getting 4G/LTE.

 

If the roll out is this slow, I would think it may be a few years before we get full coverage. This is absolutly atrocious.

 

Sprint is screwing us over. We are paying for 4G speeds with these phones but the are delivering MUCH less.

 

Time to say fugg it and move on to Verizon. I would glady pay a bigger bill but at least i am getting what I am paying for!!

 

You have had some pretty good posts on here, but this is edging on rant.

 

As a reminder, we do not host rants against Sprint, continuations will result in a temporary or permanent vacation. 

 

To address your points, you need to understand what goes into this. Sprint, unlike any other carrier, is allowing access to each sites AS SOON AS IT'S READY. Work has only been going on in St. Louis for a couple months, and is moving along at a pretty good rate. But this policy of activating each tower when it's done is giving the perception that they are moving slow.

 

Now, lets look at AT&T. When I moved to Springfield last September, I almost immediately noticed AT&T crews working on their towers. They were installing LTE Antennas and RRUs and other equipment. There were already a couple of towers done. Remember, this is in September. It took them all the way to JUNE before they launched LTE here. That's 9 months! And Springfield is not that big. But no one else knew that they took that long, all they knew was that one day they didn't have LTE, and the next they did. So before you complain about Sprint taking forever, they're not going any slower than the duopoly, if anything they're going much faster. 

 

The only one that has been moving faster is T-Mobile, but they have a completely different set of circumstances that has allowed them to blaze through their LTE deployment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True this isn't the place to complain, go to Sprint and do that. That being said on their tech segment Monday on KTRS at the end of getting his questions answered a caller said "Do yourself a favor don't sign up for Sprint". After NV is done the have a lot of pr work to do. It may be great then but old opinions die hard

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would

That too is enabled.

 

I just drove from 170 to 70 on the Rock Road, nothing. I then took 270 to South County. Finally at 270 and Gravois I started getting 4G/LTE.

 

If the roll out is this slow, I would think it may be a few years before we get full coverage. This is absolutly atrocious.

 

Sprint is screwing us over. We are paying for 4G speeds with these phones but the are delivering MUCH less.

 

Time to say fugg it and move on to Verizon. I would glady pay a bigger bill but at least i am getting what I am paying for!!

To add to what chaz said. In 3 months Sprint has completed its network vision upgrades on 20% of its sites in the MO Market. Before i came here i thought just like you did. But then i saw progress and a light at the end of thr tunnel. Remember if you go to VZW ATT or TMo, you will have to worry about caps/throttling and pay a higher rate. As for me and my household, we will stay with the Now Network and await LTE at EVERY SINGLE SPRINT SITE. Not to mention the thought of LTE being rolled out on 800 and 2500 and tri band

phones. Also, i guarantee you once the Softbank dealbis complete things will be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget Sprint is the only one replacing every thing at each tower and not just adding a bandaid.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want to rant about Sprint, this is not the place to do it. The rest of us are all waiting patiently for the rollout go be complete.

Now you are saying that you were mapping your trip with sensorly. If you are using data (sensorly does in fact use data when you are mapping a trip because it is uploading your 3g points that you are plotting. It is also loading the map.) you're phone will not switch to 4g (or at least has a very hard time). So it's not that there was no 4g coverage there, but your phone did not connect to it because it was being used.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Not true, because it did post 4G points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...