Jump to content
dkyeager

AT&T and C-Sprire PCS

Recommended Posts

No, they gave it all to ATT like morons. 

Sprint should fight for it. Doesn't this wipe out the coverage cspire does for Sprint? TMobile should fight for the 700 mhz. Att can have the AWS

 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Sprint should fight for it. Doesn't this wipe out the coverage cspire does for Sprint? TMobile should fight for the 700 mhz. Att can have the AWS

They should fight for it but I think it's a done deal. I don't know what will happen with the roaming agreement. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They should fight for it but I think it's a done deal. I don't know what will happen with the roaming agreement. 

Cspire isn't really roaming. When I was in Mississippi I got native signal and I had boost at the time. In Jackson Mississippi there is 10x10 Cblock plus G block so I wonder what happens with that?

 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if these spectrum licences are in areas they currently do not offer service in or are they excess capacity sitting in the garage?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Cspire isn't really roaming. When I was in Mississippi I got native signal and I had boost at the time

Oh yeah it does count as native doesn't it? Yeah I don't know what will happen then. The only way it doesn't happen is if the FCC says no which I highly doubt they will. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does anyone know if these spectrum licences are in areas they currently do not offer service in or are they excess capacity sitting in the garage?

More capacity. They likely only have 5x5 B12 and will get 10x10. I say TMobile should fight cause their are areas they don't have B12 at all so it's not far. Most of the licenses are the B and C block but so what. Tho this article also says the A Block which is even more unfair as that would give them 15x15 holding

 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Mississippi TMobile holds no 700 mhz

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just surprised C-Spire and US Cellular have not been bought up yet by one of the "major four" carriers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I'm wondering from a C-spire perspective has this spectrum been in service or if it is in areas they do not currently service where the licenses are located.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks, I'm wondering from a C-spire perspective has this spectrum been in service or if it is in areas they do not currently service where the licenses are located.
Good question. I know Mississippi is one and they operate there. Florida is on this article so that I don't know

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am just surprised C-Spire and US Cellular have not been bought up yet by one of the "major four" carriers. 
Att is trying with cspire and uscc isn't willing to sell. Sprint did get them in some areas where uscc couldn't do LTE.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Brad The Beast said:

No, they gave it all to ATT like morons. 

It isn't much PCS really and where it is it is just in AL, AK, and FL.  I didn't look up those specific counties in those states, but I'd assume C Spire is pulling out of FL and AL.  Don't think they offered anything in AK. 

The 700MHz they are dumping is in the Memphis area within MS which is a bit interesting. 

AWS is interesting cause it includes MS, but most of it is just 10MHz.  

 

When Sprint acquired PCS/700 in Memphis area a few years ago, it included C-Spire gaining access to Sprint's spectrum portfolio in a handful of counties.  Not sure which counties these are but it would be interesting to go back and look that up.  

Edited by red_dog007

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It isn't much PCS really.  It is in AL, AK, and FL.  Nothing in MS.  I didn't look up those specific counties in those states, but I'd assume C Spire is pulling out of FL and AL.   The 700MHz they are dumping is in the Memphis area within MS which is a bit interesting. 

Most of it is AWS, including MS.  Most of it is just 10MHz.  

 

That article says due 700 mhz it could give them enough for 15x15 which isn't fair to other carriers 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

That article says due 700 mhz it could give them enough for 15x15 which isn't fair to other carriers 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

It is interesting that it is looking specifically at 700.  AT&T is acquiring twice as much PCS+AWS.

Wonder who it isn't fair for.  AT&T will have 73MHz average in the effected counties of low band, up from 68MHz. Looks like VZW has 49MHz and TMobile 40MHz.  So give it to Sprint!? lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is interesting that it is looking specifically at 700.  AT&T is acquiring twice as much PCS+AWS.
Wonder who it isn't fair for.  AT&T will have 73MHz average in the effected counties of low band, up from 68MHz. Looks like VZW has 49MHz and TMobile 40MHz.  So give it to Sprint!? lol
TMobile doesn't have B12 in some of the areas where they want it. Mississippi one of them

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

TMobile doesn't have B12 in some of the areas where they want it. Mississippi one of them

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

If T-Mobile wanted it bad enough, their name would be on the application.  With them owned 40MHz of 600, and there still being extra 600 to be had in the areas, getting 700 may not be as urgent for them as it once was.

Edited by red_dog007

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Akron, OH - Median download speed increased from 22.7Mbps to 30.8Mbps.  Baltimore, MD - Median download speed increased from 24.4Mbps to 32.8Mbps.  Charlotte, NC - Median download speed increased from 14.7Mbps to 22Mbps.  Des Moines, IA - Median download speed increased from 16.8Mbps to 23.8Mbps. Fort Meyers, FL - Median download speed decreased from 15.5Mbps to 8.6Mbps. Mobile, AL - Median download speed increased from 18Mbps to 29.9Mbps. 
    • Sprint can't afford to go private, they can't afford to buy back shares from stockholders, going private won't happen.  Either the merger will pass (60/40 chance at this point), if not Son will find a buyer for Sprint and take a loss (hello WeWork) and as a trader the way Sprint's shares are trading its almost as if market makers are already pricing in a merger failure.  Sprint would have to do some serious trimming off its balance sheet, sale portions of its network and subs, or even file Chapter 11.  I don't really see Sprint filing bankruptcy I've seen companies with worse earnings and survive.  Son just wants out of the U.S. wireless market and merging with T-Mobile is the fastest way to do so all while pitching this "5G for all" bs <--- I don't even have faith in T-Mobile post merger if it happens.  Sprint needs someone with deep pockets like Altice or another large cable company (and most certainly not Dish). 
    • Yes, some of you disagree with me.  That's to be expected.  Sprint sucks in some places.  But Sprint is not only great in my area, but they're actually the best.  And in most metro areas, they are perfectly usable.  But guess what?  T-mobile sucks in many places.  And I can tell you here in their home market, they're the worst carrier.  Verizon also stinks in places too.  I suppose if I lived in a crappy Sprint market, I'd go.  But I can tell you I see more and more people who leave Sprint and either come back or even if they don't, admit that the network wasn't as bad as they thought and there was a complete over dramatization in the disparity in networks.  Everybody's gotta do what's best for themselves.  And if leaving Sprint is best for you, I certainly wouldn't hold it against anyone.  I've seen many go over the years.  And I still sit here plugging away behind the keyboard.  But the one thing that won't continue is the overly negative drumbeat that's happening in this thread.  You all are starting to build off each other's negativity, causing the conversation to become one sided and pointless.  Don't want to hear ad infinitum the same droll negative grumblings.  Especially the same 'ol criticisms and Sprint can't be trusted.  Frankly, the drama is not true.  Sprint took longer, yes, but it did upgrade its network, and the performance is better.  And on the whole, it's better than its ever been.  So it cannot be said Sprint didn't do it.  They did. So let's stick to the thread discussion, which is the merger.  Not on the network performance on Lower Botswana Avenue and your thoughts on changing networks because of your block. Robert 
    • Boost founder has already said he would pay $2b for the brand back. 
    • Hi, Robert While I see your points, I respectfully disagree with some of them.  Properly managed, Sprint does have the resources to compete successfully.  But the key phrase is "properly managed", and that's where Sprint has shown critical weakness time and time again. Since Dan Hesse was screwed over in the Metro PCS debacle, and then dumped after Softbank took over, Sprint hasn't shown any signs of intelligent strategic management.  Tactically, they have tried hard to succeed, and have kept up with technology, and have tried to keep up with deployments.  But Softbank's refusal to provide capital (either directly or through 3rd parties), Claure's ham-handed cost cutting,  and Masa's tunnel-vision focus on merger have all combined to put Sprint in a desperate situation. So I agree with you that Sprint could compete in the future, but I think it is unrealistic to expect Masayoshi and Softbank to actually try to compete.  If the merger fails, I think that it is far more likely that Masa will basically dump Sprint just like he dumped Hesse, and loyal Sprint employees and the few remaining independent stockholders will be left swinging in the wind.  Sprint customers (I've been with Sprint for 20+ years) will also be hung out to dry.  I hope that I am wrong.  Actually, I hope the merger goes through, but if it doesn't, then I hope that I am wrong.  But I'm not counting on it.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...