Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Colorado Market (Denver/Colo Springs/Fort Collins/Pueblo/Grand Jct)


Craig

Recommended Posts

That's not grounds for a class action lawsuit.  Your network upgrades will LARGELY be complete within the time period it said.  It did not say wall to wall LTE.  It did not even say LTE at all.  Also, you waived your right to a class action lawsuit when you signed your contract with Sprint.

 

Robert

LARGELY complete does not mean just a few isolated spots over a mile from my house and I see no indication that this will change in the next 2 weeks.  The text encouraged us to upgrade to 4g phones, advertising 10x data speeds, so this does imply we should be able to use them within a month.  Also, I am not a lawyer, but I am pretty sure a coorporation cannot make you sign away your rights when you use their product.

 

I have given Sprint the benefit of the doubt for the past year which is why I am still with them, but if they are advertising a mostly completed network with 4G in the next month, they better deliver.

Edited by davem2020
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LARGELY complete does not mean just a few isolated spots over a mile from my house and I see no indication that this will change in the next 2 weeks. The text encouraged us to upgrade to 4g phones and linked to a page with them for sale, so this does imply we should be able to use them within a month. Also, I am not a lawyer, but I am pretty sure a coorporation cannot make you sign away your rights when you use their product.

 

I have given Sprint the benefit of the doubt for the past year which is why I am still with them, but if they are advertising a mostly completed network with 4G in the next month, they better deliver.

It's sad that you don't even know what you signed, yet you're willing to argue about it. Sprint didn't make you sign anything, you walked into their store and asked for contracted service. You are only entitled to what you agreed in the contract regardless of what Sprint says in a text after the fact.

 

The network build out will be pretty much complete in your area, as Sprint said. But LTE will not. And the text didn't say it would. You are reading too much into it.

 

If you're going to threaten Sprint, find another place to do it. We aren't going to host your ignorant threats.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The network build out will be pretty much complete in your area, as Sprint said. But LTE will not.

What did he mean by this then?

 

I know it's hard to understand tone on the Internet. I'm not trying to be difficult. Lol

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What did he mean by this then?

 

I know it's hard to understand tone on the Internet. I'm not trying to be difficult. Lol

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

 

 

If you consider the number of sites that have had NV equipment installed, the build out is nearly complete. However, as Merlin said, every last site has to be installed and integrated before they can fire up the clusters.

 

So it is largely complete, but not complete. 

 

Now, it's possible they start firing things up before the end of the month, but I wouldn't count on it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see a Signal Check screenshot, and your location.

 

I suppose it's possible they have it powered down, but not likely. If you are getting a weaker 1x signal on 800 than you were on PCS, it's almost always because you're connecting to a site further away.

uploadfromtaptalk1392213896763.jpg here is screen shot from work after a prl update

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Lurking, Waiting, I went by a set of towers at Bandimere in Littleton yesterday. There were 2 techs just getting ready to hoist themselves to the the towers. Was that you??? Everytime I see someone working on a cell tower, I think of you! Santa....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will not launch Spark service in Denver until all the NV 3G upgrades are nearing completion and CSFB operational.  Currently Triband smartphones will not stay connected to Spark sites because there is very little CSFB deployed around Denver.  Only hotspots and Triband phones in LTE Only mode are able to connect to the ~100 Spark sites in the Colorado market.

 

Robert

Am I missing something, or is that assertion inconsistent with what I posted a couple pages ago?

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2172-network-visionlte-colorado-market-denvercolo-springsfort-collinspueblogrand-jct/page-87&do=findComment&comment=280428

Solid, working 4G LTE with eHRPD from my Triband phone in Golden, CO.  

Is that the only place it's working? 

Edited by Daemon42
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I missing something, or is that assertion inconsistent with what I posted a couple pages ago?

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2172-network-visionlte-colorado-market-denvercolo-springsfort-collinspueblogrand-jct/page-87&do=findComment&comment=280428

Solid, working 4G LTE with eHRPD from my Triband phone in Golden, CO.  

Is that the only place it's working? 

 

Yes, it's one of the few places where the surrounding sites are 3G upgraded with CSFB in place. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I missing something, or is that assertion inconsistent with what I posted a couple pages ago?

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2172-network-visionlte-colorado-market-denvercolo-springsfort-collinspueblogrand-jct/page-87&do=findComment&comment=280428

Solid, working 4G LTE with eHRPD from my Triband phone in Golden, CO.

Is that the only place it's working?

 

You might be connected to 4g but not to band 41

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in that context, it isn't considered a "Spark site" unless it includes connectivity to band 41? 

Just trying to get the nomenclature clear.  

 

Technically, Spark is a reference to Band 41 and the speeds associated with it. However, Sprint is calling their whole network Spark. It's a little confusing, and a bit misleading. 

 

But yes, we only consider Band 41 to be Spark sites. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess a couple of us are confused.  So we are waiting for all the towers in Denver to have the NV upgrade, that will move them to the updated version of Sprints network.  This doesn't mean 4G LTE is going to happen, just 3G on the NV Network.  Then we have to wait for the 4G LTE to roll out.  Meanwhile , those with Tri Band phones, get to play around with the "Spark" Network on some of the towers that have been upgraded to NV but not 4G LTE.  So Sprint is already rolling out another network while working on the second "4G" Network?  I didn't even get WIMAX in my neighborhood, do I have any hope for any of the new networks?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess a couple of us are confused.  So we are waiting for all the towers in Denver to have the NV upgrade, that will move them to the updated version of Sprints network.  This doesn't mean 4G LTE is going to happen, just 3G on the NV Network.  Then we have to wait for the 4G LTE to roll out.  Meanwhile , those with Tri Band phones, get to play around with the "Spark" Network on some of the towers that have been upgraded to NV but not 4G LTE.  So Sprint is already rolling out another network while working on the second "4G" Network?  I didn't even get WIMAX in my neighborhood, do I have any hope for any of the new networks?  

 

If you check out the NV Sites map, hopefully it will make more sense.

 

We are waiting for the clusters around Denver to be complete so they can fire them up. Once they bring the 3G side of things online, they can rapidly bring up LTE. If you look at Colorado Springs, it should progress similarly (though a lot more sites and a lot more work). 

 

There was one day when pretty much all the sites in the Springs were accepted and 3G was brought online. This allowed CSFB to be put in place, meaning that Tri-Band devices would be able to use LTE. Then, over the next several days, LTE was activated site by site until every one that had appropriate backhaul had LTE live. That covered most of the city.

 

Now, obviously Denver has a lot more sites, which is part of the reason it's taken longer.

 

And yes, they are currently working on TD-LTE, or Band 41 LTE in Denver, which is on Clear network sites. That upgrade has progressed pretty well, and if CSFB was in place, Tri-Band devices would be able to use it. It will have roughly the same footprint as WiMax for the time being.

 

But you don't need to worry about not getting LTE. Sprint is working to upgrade the whole network. When the clusters are fired up and 3G is activated, that means that LTE equipment is also in place. As long as appropriate backhaul has been brought in (Fiber, microwave, etc.) by the local ISP, LTE will be fired up within a couple of days.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is saying that. 

I might say that, I might not. But it wouldn't be wrong.

 

Hey Lurking, Waiting, I went by a set of towers at Bandimere in Littleton yesterday. There were 2 techs just getting ready to hoist themselves to the the towers. Was that you??? Everytime I see someone working on a cell tower, I think of you! Santa....

No, climbing towers is not in my job description, nor any ericsson, sprint, or samsung tech. We leave the climbing to the plebs. Their training is basically "don't die, don't hurt yourself, bolt goes here, cable goes here" 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...