Jump to content

Sprint in Talks to Acquire FreedomPOP

marioc21

By marioc21
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

marioc21 Member Level: eHRPD

marioc21

Posted
Posted

Well, I remember a fiercewireless story about freedompop talking to one of the big 4. Speculated that it was probably sprint. Now we have a little more light on the subject.

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/shinal/2014/11/12/tech-earnings-wrapup-new-tech-economy-john-shinal/18801555/

 

SAN FRANCISCO — Sprint Corp., the struggling No. 3 U.S. wireless player now owned by Japan's Softbank, is in talks with a Los Angeles-based wireless startup about a possible acquisition that could boost Sprint's revenue growth and lower its subscriber-acquisition costs, said two people familiar with the talks.

 

The talks are fluid, meaning they could lead to an investment, an acquisition or no deal between the companies. Other suitors have emerged for FreedomPop, among them a large U.S. technology company and a smaller wireless carrier, said these people.

 

An acquisition would likely value all of FreedomPop in a range between $250 million and $450 million, while an investment would value it closer to $200 million.

 

...

 

"Our goal next will be to get to postpaid phone net additions," which are the path to profitability for Sprint, Claure said on the conference call.

 

FreedomPop has been acquiring post-paid wireless subscribers on the cheap, then has held onto them thanks to plans that begin at $5 a month and a peer-to-peer platform for trading minutes.

 

The startup, which began life as a wireless hotspot provider, acquires 95% of its subscribers online, making its customer-acquisition costs of $4 per user a tiny fraction of Sprint's.

 

FreedomPop is converting 50% of consumers who try its free service into paying customers, company officials told me in an interview earlier this year.

 

The two companies have had a partnership for more than a year, with Sprint adding thousands of the startups users onto its wholesale wireless network.

..

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sbolen Member Level: 4G WiMax

sbolen

Posted
Posted

Every story I see the begins like this: Sprint Corp., the struggling No. 3 U.S. wireless player now owned by Japan's Softbank ...

 

... reminds me of the mid-90s, when Apple couldn't be mentioned in any write-up without seeing the word beleaguered somewhere. It turned out OK for Apple, and it'll likely turn out OK for Sprint. It's just funny seeing the parallels. 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Conan Kudo Member Level: eHRPD

Conan Kudo

Posted
Posted

Every story I see the begins like this: Sprint Corp., the struggling No. 3 U.S. wireless player now owned by Japan's Softbank ...

 

... reminds me of the mid-90s, when Apple couldn't be mentioned in any write-up without seeing the word beleaguered somewhere. It turned out OK for Apple, and it'll likely turn out OK for Sprint. It's just funny seeing the parallels. 

On the flip side, the same thing was said of Commodore International, Palm, Northern Telecom (Nortel), WorldCom, and many others. They all eventually failed.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sbolen Member Level: 4G WiMax

sbolen

Posted
Posted

On the flip side, the same thing was said of Commodore International, Palm, Northern Telecom (Nortel), WorldCom, and many others. They all eventually failed. 

 

tumblr_ln4prk6FYV1qafeogo1_500.jpg

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites
themuffinman Member Level: LTE Advanced

themuffinman

Posted
Posted

On the flip side, the same thing was said of Commodore International, Palm, Northern Telecom (Nortel), WorldCom, and many others. They all eventually failed.

 

, 

buzzkill.png

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Destroyallcubes Member Level: 4G LTE

Destroyallcubes

Posted
Posted

I dont think sprint will fail. The wireless industry cant take just 3 competitors, according to the FCC. So if sprint did fail, how do you think the spectrum would get divided? If it ks a pay for spectrum thing Tmobile gets left out, and then screwed. Customer wise it would be a huge chunk headed for the Top 2 , a lot less of a percentage to Tmobile. Would be a bad scenario for Tmobile in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thewezgrays Member Level: eHRPD

thewezgrays

Posted
Posted

I would love this to remain a thread about Freedompop being bought out... would be interesting to see what Sprint changes -- as well as what others think will happen etc...

 

Right now I am very happy with my Freedompop phone as my second phone and I am not paying anything for it!  I miss tri-band but, it is saving me a lot of money. (I think it makes a great 2nd phone -- but I wouldn't use it as my primary phone due to being restricted to voip -- and data isn't always strong enough for that)... 

 

As far as the off topic discussion, I loved the Sprint compared Apple comment -- but that was rightfully followed up to a comment to Sprint compared to Commodore/Palm/etc... both are rather ludicrous comparisons, but funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • 4GHoward
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By 4GHoward · Posted

      This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • Yuhfhrh
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By Yuhfhrh · Posted

      The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • Paynefanbro
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...