Jump to content

The state of LTE in the U.S.: How the carriers’ 4G networks stack up


jamisonshaw125

Recommended Posts

 

 

The sad thing is Sprint has the spectrum resources to build the biggest, baddest LTE network in the country. It just refuses to do so. As of now, Sprint’s mobile broadband service is the slowest in the country, it has the least amount of capacity and it has the smallest coverage footprint. Maybe one day Sprint will truly live up to it’s 4G potential, but I doubt its customers will wait that long.

Gotta love the ignorance of these writers.  They don't realize Sprint's upgraded ~28,000 in the last 12 months, nor do they think they're even trying...They are right about the Spectrum holdings, though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta love the ignorance of these writers.  They don't realize Sprint's upgraded ~28,000 in the last 12 months, nor do they think they're even trying...They are right about the Spectrum holdings, though.

The problem is that even with all these upgrades, Sprint is perceived to be unable to keep up with the rest of the national operators. That, in itself, is a huge problem. Sprint's Spark isn't helping, it's making everything worse by raising people's expectations and having them crash and burn through real-world experiences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, Kevin Fitchard really blew it on his Sprint coverage in the article.  That is the worst piece I've ever read from him.  I'm really shocked.  His Band 26 info is wrong, there is even Band 26 live right this very second.  Also, no one is aggregating different bands yet.  Why would you hold that against Sprint?  

 

But worst of all, his Band 41 stuff is completely off the mark.  He know that Band 41 speeds can be kept way higher than 5-12Mbps because Sprint has so much capacity.  They can just keep deploying carrier after carrier to keep peak speeds up.  Sprint can keep average speeds way over 30Mbps on Band 41 if it wants to.  It mentions 5-12Mbps because of the signal strength many will encounter, especially deep in buildings.  Not because of network performance.

 

Since he is so familiar with carrier aggregation and holds it against Sprint for not doing it with other bands together, why doesn't he mention that Sprint is working on aggregating Band 41 carriers to bring really fast speeds surpassing even the other wireless providers?

 

I'm really disappointed in Kevin Fitchard.

 

Robert

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that even with all these upgrades, Sprint is perceived to be unable to keep up with the rest of the national operators. That, in itself, is a huge problem. Sprint's Spark isn't helping, it's making everything worse by raising people's expectations and having them crash and burn through real-world experiences.

 

That's your perception too.  Isn't that convenient?  Kevin supports your narrative.  Band 41 is helping, buddy.  Helping a lot.  You only look for evidence that supports your anti-Sprint, Magenta loving point of view.

 

Robert

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that even with all these upgrades, Sprint is perceived to be unable to keep up with the rest of the national operators. That, in itself, is a huge problem. Sprint's Spark isn't helping, it's making everything worse by raising people's expectations and having them crash and burn through real-world experiences.

 

He also makes it sound like T-Mobile has a 20MHz network everywhere.  No mention of lack of rural coverage.  No mention of the patchy LTE network.  No mention they only have 5MHz in some markets.  Only the good news.  And with Sprint, only the bad news.  And even the bad news was poorly portrayed.  It's a bad piece.

 

Robert

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that even with all these upgrades, Sprint is perceived to be unable to keep up with the rest of the national operators. That, in itself, is a huge problem. Sprint's Spark isn't helping, it's making everything worse by raising people's expectations and having them crash and burn through real-world experiences.

You don't think T-Mobile boasting their 120mbps speeds isn't setting customer's expectations high?  They've got it only in 1 city so far.  Sprint's only promising 5-12mbps, which is perfectly reasonable.  B41 will and does bring faster speeds than that but Sprint is under-promising and over-delivering.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He also makes it sound like T-Mobile has a 20MHz network everywhere.  No mention of lack of rural coverage.  No mention of the patchy LTE network.  No mention they only have 5MHz in some markets.  Only the good news.  And with Sprint, only the bad news.  And even the bad news was poorly portrayed.  It's a bad piece.

 

Robert

Err, actually, he did mention that. T-Mobile does generally have a 20MHz network in most markets, when you realize he's talking about 10MHz FDD (10+10 MHz). He refers to Verizon's AWS network as a 40MHz network, so that's a good clue to note.

 

He did also mention the lack of mobile broadband coverage outside the metro areas, too.

 

You don't think T-Mobile boasting their 120mbps speeds isn't setting customer's expectations high?  They've got it only in 1 city so far.  Sprint's only promising 5-12mbps, which is perfectly reasonable.  B41 will and does bring faster speeds than that but Sprint is under-promising and over-delivering.

Sprint is mentioning 50-60 Mbps in its press releases. Those get repeated everywhere. It's only after you actually contact Sprint PR for details do they mention the 5-12Mbps number.

 

I don't specifically recall any mentions of 120Mbps outside of Dallas, where it exists today. They've been using Ookla data to show T-Mobile is the fastest, on average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He quotes every other providers peak speeds, but mentions Sprint's advertised speeds and holds it against them. Mentions other carriers aggregating bands which hasn't been done, and says Sprint won't do the same. Certainly had a bone to pick going into writing that article.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's your perception too. Isn't that convenient? Kevin supports your narrative. Band 41 is helping, buddy. Helping a lot. You only look for evidence that supports your anti-Sprint, Magenta loving point of view.

 

Robert

Is he a paid tmo salesman? Sure sounds like it.

 

Jim, Sent from my Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert, I have a bad feeling about this thread... <_<

 

I'm watching.  Trolls will be executed on sight.

 

Robert

  • Like 18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's your perception too.  Isn't that convenient?  Kevin supports your narrative.  Band 41 is helping, buddy.  Helping a lot.  You only look for evidence that supports your anti-Sprint, Magenta loving point of view.

 

Robert

Hardly. I refuse to make any judgement on Spark until I can witness it myself. The only judgement I can make is that I am not likely to be able to try it for at least a year or two, since it'll have to make its way down from Tier 1 cities to Tier 3 cities. I'm hopeful that I'll be able to travel to a Tier 1 city soon to try it.

 

I'm only saying what most of the people I talk to say.

 

While I was forced to cancel my Sprint service again and return my Moto X because of costs (I needed cash to pay for new glasses, since they broke on Christmas), I do plan to re-establish service soon. I do currently still own a Galaxy S4 mini, which is a tri-band device. I would have rather sold it to buy a Nexus 5, but it'll do.

 

And LTE multi-carrier will help, in places where Sprint actually has Band 41 deployed. The number of places it is accessible is growing almost every day, but it's still not going to be very large before the end of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardly. I refuse to make any judgement on Spark until I can witness it myself. The only judgement I can make is that I am not likely to be able to try it for at least a year or two, since it'll have to make its way down from Tier 1 cities to Tier 3 cities. I'm hopeful that I'll be able to travel to a Tier 1 city soon to try it.

 

I'm only saying what most of the people I talk to say.

 

While I was forced to cancel my Sprint service again and return my Moto X because of costs (I needed cash to pay for new glasses, since they broke on Christmas), I do plan to re-establish service soon. I do currently still own a Galaxy S4 mini, which is a tri-band device. I would have rather sold it to buy a Nexus 5, but it'll do.

 

Don't you have to say that you have to wait to see Tmo 20MHz service yourself?  And see it spread to all areas of the country?  Say, Starkville??  Get off it, man.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Anthony

Anyone using Doctor Who references, gets bonus points!   :coolbeans: 

 

I need to get a Dalek emoticon!

 

Robert

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Article was disgusting and straight ignorance. S**t like that makes me want sprint and SoftBank come with a bang this year!

Hopefully they exceed their deployment goals for 800. & 2600. Also I hope they start to deploy 20+ 20 end of this year.

I kind of wish sprint waited to announce spark though. I personally think they should of started deploying it and then once they completed the 1900 lte rollout then announce spark.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't you have to say that you have to wait to see Tmo 20MHz service yourself?  And see it spread to all areas of the country?  Say, Starkville??  Get off it, man.

 

Robert

I want both Sprint and T-Mobile LTE service in Starkville. Honestly, I don't care too much about LTE from T-Mobile, as the HSPA+ is plenty fast. But I do care about LTE from Sprint, because the EvDO is horrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want both Sprint and T-Mobile LTE service in Starkville. Honestly, I don't care too much about LTE from T-Mobile, as the HSPA+ is plenty fast. But I do care about LTE from Sprint, because the EvDO is horrible.

 

If WCDMA is plenty fast for you, then you certainly are not in a position to complain about Spark/B41 high speeds.  So you must at least dispute Kevin's Band 41 conclusions, correct?  Also, Sprint has launched LTE service in Starkville, and all over the Golden Triangle.  I know you once claimed that you couldn't connect, but surely it is live now.  Sprint shows it on their coverage maps.  So this also must make you happy?  Correct?

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If WCDMA is plenty fast for you, then you certainly are not in a position to complain about Spark/B41 high speeds.  So you must at least dispute Kevin's Band 41 conclusions, correct?  Also, Sprint has launched LTE service in Starkville, and all over the Golden Triangle.  I know you once claimed that you couldn't connect, but surely it is live now.  Sprint shows it on their coverage maps.  So this also must make you happy?  Correct?

 

Robert

How can I dispute what I've never used? I've only managed to used Band 25 LTE in the last week before returning the Moto X. The low latency (~80ms) was impressive, but the throughput is depressingly low, averaging around 4Mbps, despite the low number of Sprint subscribers in the area. I also had some difficulty maintaining a connection, even in a strong area, but I'm not sure if that was a problem with the Moto X.

 

I am hopeful that if Band 41 service were to launch here, the speeds would be raised to >15Mbps (meeting or exceeding T-Mobile's HSPA+21 average speed).

 

And seriously, why the heck are you mad at me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...