Jump to content

PCS/AWS-2 H block FCC Auction 96 results thread


WiWavelength

Recommended Posts

So what is these bid are for?

 

The PCS/AWS-2 H block.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pardon my ignorance, but why, in layman's term is 1900mhz so popular? Or can someone direct me to a location where I could my answer.

 

I wouldn't say it's any more popular than any other spectrum. The reason we are talking about 1900Mhz in this thread is because that's what this H block spectrum being bid on was, 1900Mhz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pardon my ignorance, but why, in layman's term is 1900mhz so popular? Or can someone direct me to a location where I could my answer.

Dish is interested in the 1900 MHz H Block because they already own spectrum adjacent to it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pardon my ignorance, but why, in layman's term is 1900mhz so popular? Or can someone direct me to a location where I could my answer.

All usable spectrum is popular when it becomes available. Because there is a limited quantity available.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really want to see what Dish does with this spectrum and its other spectrum. They will have to use either T-Mobile or Sprint to host it, most probably Sprint. But if they are having ambitions of OTT play, I am not sure that what they have is enough. Plus what they wanted to do with their own spectrum in conjunction with the Lightsquared spectrum is now moot (reverse uplink and downlink). It's going to be interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...

So according to the spectrum map, it looks like Dish only bought the H block for the western half of the US?  Is this true because I would have thought that Dish bought almost nationwide licenses for the H block.

 

http://specmap.sequence-omega.net/

I don't know.  But I can tell you this...there is already activity on the spectrum analyzer in Wyoming on H block.  But not in North Dakota, South Dakota and that part of Nebraska not colored in.

 

I almost drove off the road when I discovered activity on H block in Wyoming.  It started near the border and was full intensity about 30 miles in.  Staying a steady -90dBm or so.  But it was not a full 5MHz wide.  Seemed like approximately 2-3MHz wide.  And it was uniform.  No matter where I went, even 200 miles inside Wyoming.  Like it was beamed from space.  

 

It stayed within 5-6MHz of -90dBm every mile.  Behind buildings, behind hills and mountains.  It had to be a satellite.  And it went away within 20 miles of driving out of Wyoming.

 

Robert

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know.  But I can tell you this...there is already activity on the spectrum analyzer in Wyoming on H block.  But not in North Dakota, South Dakota and that part of Nebraska not colored in.

 

I almost drove off the road when I discovered activity on H block in Wyoming.  It started near the border and was full intensity about 30 miles in.  Staying a steady -90dBm or so.  But it was not a full 5MHz wide.  Seemed like approximately 2-3MHz wide.  And it was uniform.  No matter where I went, even 200 miles inside Wyoming.  Like it was beamed from space.  

 

It stayed within 5-6MHz of -90dBm every mile.  Behind buildings, behind hills and mountains.  It had to be a satellite.  And it went away within 20 miles of driving out of Wyoming.

 

Robert

Dish doing FIT tests? Or Sprint doing it for them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dish doing FIT tests? Or Sprint doing it for them?

If it's being done by satellite, it would have to be Dish.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's being done by satellite, it would have to be Dish.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

If coming from a satellite, I would think you would need a dish type antenna to be able to capture enough signal and you would have to have it pointed at he satellite.  But after saying that, if you think about a mobile GPS receiver, it captures data from multiple satellites without a dish type antenna.   I would also question if Charlie would have a satellite in orbit that could transmit on those H block frequencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If coming from a satellite, I would think you would need a dish type antenna to be able to capture enough signal and you would have to have it pointed at he satellite. But after saying that, if you think about a mobile GPS receiver, it captures data from multiple satellites without a dish type antenna. I would also question if Charlie would have a satellite in orbit that could transmit on those H block frequencies.

It was on a spectrum analyzer, not a phone. If I can keep a rock steady signal through 200 miles of desert mountains, it can only be from space. I can come up with no other conceivable explanation for the signal. I can pick up satellite signals in 2000MHz on a spectrum analyzer. They are beaming the signal to the surface of the earth.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was on a spectrum analyzer, not a phone. If I can keep a rock steady signal through 200 miles of desert mountains, it can only be from space. I can come up with no other conceivable explanation for the signal. I can pick up satellite signals in 2000MHz on a spectrum analyzer. They are beaming the signal to the surface of the earth.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

It would amaze me that the antenna in a Spectrum analyzer could pick up that strong of a signal from a satellite without a dish type antenna.  I have some hands on experience in installing and aiming a directv satellite dish and I assure you, it better be aimed at the correct spot or you ain't going to get a signal good enough to use.  Very hard to aim and capture the signal.

   If this was from one of Charlie's satellites, he was probably using a "Spot Beam" to cover a small area.

I have to wonder how much power he would have to use to get a strong enough signal on the ground that you could pick it up without much trouble.  You may have really stumbled into something that was previously unknown to the general public.

 

I would not think that any of Charlie's older satellites would have been equipped to broadcast on the H Block unless Charlie had bought a satellite from another bankrupt satellite company that had previously been allowed to transmit on those frequencies. Since Charlie only recently acquired the H Block, he would not have had time to build and launch a new satellite equipped to use the H Block.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would amaze me that the antenna in a Spectrum analyzer could pick up that strong of a signal from a satellite without a dish type antenna. I have some hands on experience in installing and aiming a directv satellite dish and I assure you, it better be aimed at the correct spot or you ain't going to get a signal good enough to use. Very hard to aim and capture the signal.

If this was from one of Charlie's satellites, he was probably using a "Spot Beam" to cover a small area.

I have to wonder how much power he would have to use to get a strong enough signal on the ground that you could pick it up without much trouble. You may have really stumbled into something that was previously unknown to the general public.

 

I would not think that any of Charlie's older satellites would have been equipped to broadcast on the H Block unless Charlie had bought a satellite from another bankrupt satellite company that had previously been allowed to transmit on those frequencies. Since Charlie only recently acquired the H Block, he would not have had time to build and launch a new satellite equipped to use the H Block.

-90dBm is not a very strong signal. But it was consistent. At best it was -86dBm. At worst, -93dBm. I'd love to hear another explanation. There were no towers of any type in most of the area, and this is pretty high frequency spectrum. It's not coming from a mountain top or boomers. There would have been a lot of variability. Also, the signal just magically appeared within the past 2-3 weeks. Wasn't there in Mid July.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But after saying that, if you think about a mobile GPS receiver, it captures data from multiple satellites without a dish type antenna.

 

Yes, but at the Earth's surface, GPS signals are typically on the order of -150 dBm RSSI.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-90dBm is not a very strong signal. But it was consistent. At best it was -86dBm. At worst, -93dBm. I'd love to hear another explanation. There were no towers of any type in most of the area, and this is pretty high frequency spectrum. It's not coming from a mountain top or boomers. There would have been a lot of variability. Also, the signal just magically appeared within the past 2-3 weeks. Wasn't there in Mid July.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

You were probably picking up signal from Dish's adjacent S-Band 2000-2020MHz bleeding over. But as far as I know that is supposed to be an uplink and not a downlink. Is Dish testing it as a downlink? They have not filed their application to turn it into a downlink yet, as far as I know.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but at the Earth's surface, GPS signals are typically on the order of -150 dBm RSSI.

 

AJ

OK AJ, if the GPS signals are typically -150 RSSI, do you know what the signal levels are on a Directv or Dish satellite?  Why does it take a carefully aimed dish at home to pick up those signals while a GPS can pick up a -150 with a cheapie built in antenna?  Is the GPS satellite transmitting at a much higher power?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK AJ, if the GPS signals are typically -150 RSSI, do you know what the signal levels are on a Directv or Dish satellite?  Why does it take a carefully aimed dish at home to pick up those signals while a GPS can pick up a -150 with a cheapie built in antenna?  Is the GPS satellite transmitting at a much higher power?

 

GPS signals are very low data rate CDMA.  So, the spreading gain between the data rate and the signal bandwidth is massive.  DBS signals do not have that advantage.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Saw that for a while. Now back to n25 + n71 + n41-100Mhz + n41-90Mhz.
    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...