Jump to content

Crowd sourced coverage


mhammett
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://www.cellmapper.net/ is another one. Even before I found S4GRU, I felt that Sensorly was the most popular service, and they had the best mobile app. OpenSignal has some strange things in their app (like the "which direction is your tower" estimator that I have never observed working with any accuracy) that make me scratch my head.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've used both Sensorly and OpenSignal, but Sensorly is far less buggy and feels more polished. Doesn't Root Metrics use crowd sourcing for their coverage maps? I have installed and poked around a couple more but quickly deleted them. Most everything out there for "signal info" or "coverage comparisons" is crap besides SignalCheck (Pro) and Sensorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.cellmapper.net/ is another one. Even before I found S4GRU, I felt that Sensorly was the most popular service, and they had the best mobile app. OpenSignal has some strange things in their app (like the "which direction is your tower" estimator that I have never observed working with any accuracy) that make me scratch my head.

 

-Mike

I was looking for that one the other day! I used it back in the day on my Epic. Thanks for the link!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been messing around with an app called Net Monitor. When it's active it will log your location, signal strength and your SID, NID and BID that you can export to a KML file. That can be opened by Google maps and you can selectively see how the coverage is working on a sector by sector basis. It's pretty neat. It's not crowd sourced at all which was the next step I was wanting to take it. Find a way to take uploaded KML files, average the data and make it publicly accessible. That's the part where I've not dabbled much at all. 

 

My personal experience is that the KML files can get quite excessive in size which makes GMaps very unresponsive when opening it the first time. 

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been messing around with an app called Net Monitor. When it's active it will log your location, signal strength and your SID, NID and BID that you can export to a KML file. That can be opened by Google maps and you can selectively see how the coverage is working on a sector by sector basis. It's pretty neat. It's not crowd sourced at all which was the next step I was wanting to take it. Find a way to take uploaded KML files, average the data and make it publicly accessible. That's the part where I've not dabbled much at all.

 

My personal experience is that the KML files can get quite excessive in size which makes GMaps very unresponsive when opening it the first time.

 

Thoughts?

Netmonitor only works if the sites in your market broadcast their true locations. In most markets, they do not. Rather they broadcast some point offset, sometimes quite sways away, for each sector.

 

Sent from my HTC ONE

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Netmonitor only works if the sites in your market broadcast their true locations. In most markets, they do not. Rather they broadcast some point offset, sometimes quite sways away, for each sector.

 

Sent from my HTC ONE

That may be true. I know in the Columbus market they've been accurate. But the site's location is irrelevant if you're mapping signal quality. Your GPS location, the RSSI and the site's SID/NID/BID are relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That may be true. I know in the Columbus market they've been accurate. But the site's location is irrelevant if you're mapping signal quality. Your GPS location, the RSSI and the site's SID/NID/BID are relevant.

True. I just automatically assumed you were wanting the site location. Reading it again, I see you didn't actually mention that.

 

Sent from my HTC ONE

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just figured out this is a waste of time. US Mobile and Verizon lock the eSim to the emei while T-Mobile only uses it to see that you have a capable phone, like Red Pocket does with physical sims (although RP does keep track of what phone you are using it on with the emei.)  So @Trip was right in this case on liking physical sims.
    • Verizon has a reputation for being frugal with MVNOs. After looking around, I also decided US Mobile was my best option. People have gotten C band on it.  Hoping for esim for my S21 Ultra.  No luck so far.  Red Pocket does not claim Verizon 5g, although they say Soon!(TM).  I do see some 5g with it. Typically MVNOs are deprioritized, thus I am reluctant to claim truly getting top speeds with one.
    • Did some exploring yesterday/last night and didn't find a shred of C-Band, including with my brand new US Mobile SIM. Did find 4CA CBRS but the site seemed backhaul constrained; both that plus 15x15 B2 and band-locked 2/66 got me 190 Mbps or so.
    • Did some more exploring yesterday/last night and I think I spotted some LAA downtown but didn't get a chance to confirm before it went away in favor of mmW, which also went away pretty quickly. Also saw another n66 site, as well as an n2 site, making AT&T the second carrier to run n2 DSS within a few miles of me. I think at this point they won't be able to advertise anything flashy, but due to the sheer amount of CA they're throwing at customers here they can keep their network at 50+ Mbps until they can deploy both 3.45 and 3.7, and that's probably enough.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...