Jump to content

Sprint vs AT&T vs T-Mobile LTE via Sensorly


Recommended Posts

Well i won't Include Verizon lol and we all know why xD
But here:
LAST UPDATE: 8-3-13

Sprint :

6lnr.png
 



Alaska:

No 4G shown.

 
 

Tmobile:

cv4n.png
 



Alaska:

NO 4G shown.

 

 

 

ATT:

vhgj.png

Alaska:

uHZDHkr.png

 

Verizon:

 

No map yet. Not comparable just quite yet.

 

Alaska:

5r1j.png

As of 7-24-2013
It Seems as if att and Sprint are close.
I'll try to update this once a month. I just thought this was interesting. It says alot lol
Only ATT and Verizon have a dot of coverage in Alaska.

 

 

 

 

Update on 8-3-2013

 

Sprint

2ZwSOuY.png

ATT:

e0aW8mq.png

Tmobile:

CN87YqY.png

Note:No change in Alaska.

ATT has changed a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I approve of this thread

 

 

Okay, maybe you are not Mitt Romney...

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You did. But.

 

You're missing some of the west coast on AT&T, plus Florida, Texas and some of Maine in all the maps.

 

I'm going to change your name to "the lol guy"

 

lol

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not sure how accurate that is on the whole.

 

Sprint users tend to use Sensorly way more that the other carriers.

Comparing my local maps show Sprint with WAY more coverage than the other carriers.  having come from Big Red a few months ago i know this is not accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not sure how accurate that is on the whole.

 

Sprint users tend to use Sensorly way more that the other carriers.

Comparing my local maps show Sprint with WAY more coverage than the other carriers.  having come from Big Red a few months ago i know this is not accurate.

That's why I said Via sensorly In the title sir :)

 

What's the point of this thread?

I was bored.. Why you gotta hate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I said Via sensorly In the title sir :)

 

I was bored.. Why you gotta hate?

 

Lol no hate at all.. Was just wondering...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like Sprint is close to AT&T in terms of city.... But AT&T covers alot more interstates that connect those cities, but Sprint will get there..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T has a lot of grey lines.  Obviously LTE got picked up in those areas but since its a really weak signal is it even really useable?

 

 

What are the grey lines?

btw lol I watched then saw ur avatar xD

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=546817512045974&set=vb.590222454329569&type=2&theater

haha that is a great video clip.  With a few things that are talked about on this site, my face does the same thing as the shorter minion so thats why I have it.  Plus I love the movie.  Anyway the grey lines in sensorly just mean weak signal so -112 dbm or less (I think thats it or its less then -110 dbm something like that) anyway so I was curious if where the grey is with a weak signal if LTE is even usable or if you can just discredit that mapping.  Because connecting lots of places AT&T has lots of grey areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha that is a great video clip.  With a few things that are talked about on this site, my face does the same thing as the shorter minion so thats why I have it.  Plus I love the movie.  Anyway the grey lines in sensorly just mean weak signal so -112 dbm or less (I think thats it or its less then -110 dbm something like that) anyway so I was curious if where the grey is with a weak signal if LTE is even usable or if you can just discredit that mapping.  Because connecting lots of places AT&T has lots of grey areas.

 

I thought grey was when a phone mapped no signal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T has a lot of grey lines.  Obviously LTE got picked up in those areas but since its a really weak signal is it even really useable?

 

 

What are the grey lines?

btw lol I watched then saw ur avatar xD

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=546817512045974&set=vb.590222454329569&type=2&theater

Grey means no signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well i won't Include Verizon lol and we all know why xD

But here:

 

Sprint :

6lnr.png

 

Alaska:

No 4G shown.

 

 

Tmobile:

cv4n.png

 

Alaska:

NO 4G shown.

 

 

 

ATT:

vhgj.png

Alaska:

uHZDHkr.png

 

Verizon:

 

No map yet. Not comparable just quite yet.

 

Alaska:

5r1j.png

As of 7-24-2013

It Seems as if att and Sprint are close.

I'll try to update this once a month. I just thought this was interesting. It says alot lol

Only ATT and Verizon have a dot of coverage in Alaska.

 

This will be super interesting to see once 800 kicks into high gear. There's gonna be a whole lot of purple for Sprint :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...