Jump to content

PRL 25015/56015/51097

Mooeydj

By Mooeydj
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

digiblur
digiblur

Just going to go throw this out there.... this is just a piece of the changes.  The cool piece!!!  Is it June 30th yet?  I also noticed 22429 wasn't added so they can keep hiding it in testing.   -A

nobius
nobius

Maybe there should be a "Current PRL" sticky thread that is updated by digiblur similar to the NV Sites Map that lists the current PRLs and links to discussions about them.

digiblur
digiblur

I see this issue.. my post was too big or something got cut off.   There's more....  well to make it easier let's just say what's not 800SMR scanned now:   Here are the only 4 800SMR SIDs that are N

Posted Images

digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

What about prl 2001 for the note 2, I can't find much about it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

Definitely weird... I snagged a 2000 along with a few others, some other folks snagged a 2002.  Now you have a 2001.  Odd.  Trying to get some of these to do any analysis on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

I see one of my biggest pet peeves pervades this thread, too.

 

So, we need to start a "3G" jar. Anyone who calls EV-DO generically "3G" has to put a dollar in the jar that then gets donated to the site.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
omega Member Level: 1x Advanced

omega

Posted
Posted

I see one of my biggest pet peeves pervades this thread, too.

 

 

So, we need to start a "3G" jar. Anyone who calls EV-DO generically "3G" has to put a dollar in the jar that then gets donated to the site.

 

 

AJ

Hmm well evdo is 3g or did the redo it to be 5g now lmao ?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Hmm well evdo is 3g or did the redo it to be 5g now lmao ?

 

No, but CDMA1X has always been 3G, too.

 

So, referring to EV-DO as "3G" is akin to referring to Coke as a "cola" -- yet insisting that Pepsi is not one.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites
digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

What about prl 2001 for the note 2, I can't find much about it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

My initial suspicions were correct. The weird number is due to an emergency temporary PRL for certain devices. They removed every single bit of 800SMR scans out of the PRL. And yes, 2000 is the standard account PRL with no VZW EVDO roaming. The 2002 is the corporate EVDO roaming PRL. I bet this PRL will be here until they can fire up a bunch of 800SMR after 6/30/13.

 

I bet the 2001 is the business EVDO roaming PRL.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
omega Member Level: 1x Advanced

omega

Posted
Posted

 

 

What about prl 2001 for the note 2, I can't find much about it.

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

My initial suspicions were correct. The weird number is due to an emergency temporary PRL for certain devices. They removed every single bit of 800SMR scans out of the PRL. And yes, 2000 is the standard account PRL with no VZW EVDO roaming. The 2002 is the corporate EVDO roaming PRL. I bet this PRL will be here until they can fire up a bunch of 800SMR after 6/30/13.

 

I bet the 2001 is the business EVDO roaming PRL.

Interesting Thank You for looking into them.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
digiblur Member Level: LTE Advanced

digiblur

Posted
Posted

Galaxy s4 in Memphis TN area 55015 prl

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

 

I suspect if you hit update PRL you won't be anymore.  The 2xxx PRLs are only on worldphone devices right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
southaven1981 Member Level: Smoke Signals

southaven1981

Posted
Posted

 

 

Galaxy s4 in Memphis TN area 55015 prl

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

I suspect if you hit update PRL you won't be anymore. The 2xxx PRLs are only on worldphone devices right now.

No sir still 55015. After updating prl and profile

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jreuschl Member Level: 4G WiMax

jreuschl

Posted
Posted

I have a Note II.  I hope this is not some kind of "bug" with the 800 SMR band on this device that they are disabling access to that band.

 

We know the iPhone has a special PRL that gives lowest priority to 800.  I hope the Note II doesn't need complete lack of priority!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rukin1 Member Level: eHRPD

Rukin1

Posted
Posted

I have a Note II.  I hope this is not some kind of "bug" with the 800 SMR band on this device that they are disabling access to that band.

 

We know the iPhone has a special PRL that gives lowest priority to 800.  I hope the Note II doesn't need complete lack of priority!

rofl my mothers got the note 2, there is 800 launched here and it will NOT connect to it lol. I can't even access PRL write.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
omega Member Level: 1x Advanced

omega

Posted
Posted

I had tons of issues here in Indiana I would connect fine with 800 MHz just no voice or SMS service.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rukin1 Member Level: eHRPD

Rukin1

Posted
Posted

My initial suspicions were correct. The weird number is due to an emergency temporary PRL for certain devices. They removed every single bit of 800SMR scans out of the PRL. And yes, 2000 is the standard account PRL with no VZW EVDO roaming. The 2002 is the corporate EVDO roaming PRL. I bet this PRL will be here until they can fire up a bunch of 800SMR after 6/30/13.

 

I bet the 2001 is the business EVDO roaming PRL.

rofl explains y my mothers is 2000. But mines still at 25015

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nobius Member Level: eHRPD

nobius

Posted
Posted

Maybe there should be a "Current PRL" sticky thread that is updated by digiblur similar to the NV Sites Map that lists the current PRLs and links to discussions about them.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Dkoellerwx
      T-Mobile to acquire UScellular

      By Dkoellerwx · Posted

      Probably a lot of Midwest towers. Slight bias since Nebraska is a weird market, but there are tons of USCC sites that T-Mobile isn't yet co-located on. Think a similar situation in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Missouri. But some other markets, like yours, probably don't have that issue!
    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Bubble Gum
    • chamb
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By chamb · Posted

      Sticky Customers - YES, and leave them flip to the T-Mobile PLMN when needed and they will be even more likely to Stick.
    • Trip
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By Trip · Posted

      It seems to me that if the goal is to improve rural, the US Cellular buy-out would get them only part of the way there, considering there are plenty of rural areas that US Cellular does not serve.  But I also have a hard time reading it the way I think that article is, that the cost of this deal comes straight out of the $9 billion.  I mean, they're getting spectrum for their existing operations in US Cellular markets, including places that I wouldn't call rural.  (Roanoke, VA is the 9th largest city in the state, for example.)  It seems like some of it should be allocated to rural expansion, but certainly not the whole purchase price. There's also something to be said for getting the customer base of potentially sticky customers who have been used to US Cellular being the only game in town for potentially decades. - Trip
    • dkyeager
      T-Mobile to acquire UScellular

      By dkyeager · Posted

      T-Mobile has stated 15% of their sites don't have 5g triband. In WV I know WISPs had a lot of 2.5GHz, but T-Mobile was trying to buy as much as possible. More rural FWA would be a big selling point that might overcome any soft bandwidth cap slight overages. Especially since UScellular likely started offering it on c-band.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...