Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Dakotas Market (including Fargo, Grand Forks, Alexandria MN)


mozamcrew

Recommended Posts

ok guys im in the Denver area and will be going to Sturgis next year and looking at the maps im a bit discouraged.

Obviously thats a long ways away and things are changing by the minute so just like some info on what service is like there now.

 

However im wondering what swiftell is?

I read on here that sprint is building new towers and if they are do we know where?

 

Thanks

Jeff

Swiftel is just in far Eastern South Dakota and NW Iowa (Sioux Falls, Sioux City, Brookings). Western South Dakota (Rapid City, Sturgis, Black Hills) has no Sprint service at all. None. You will roam on Verizon 1x in this area.

 

There are rumors that Sprint is building out service in some places in North Dakota. But that is unsubstantiated. I can tell you without any doubt that Sprint has not started building anything in Western South Dakota.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ironically, after my post yesterday, I saw digging equipment by a Sprint tower that I drive by everyday. I am hoping that is for the fiber backhaul?

It sure sounds like it. :fingers:

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swiftel is just in far Eastern South Dakota and NW Iowa (Sioux Falls, Sioux City, Brookings). Western South Dakota (Rapid City, Sturgis, Black Hills) has no Sprint service at all. None. You will roam on Verizon 1x in this area.

 

There are rumors that Sprint is building out service in some places in North Dakota. But that is unsubstantiated. I can tell you without any doubt that Sprint has not started building anything in Western South Dakota.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

thanks Robert.

I figured Verizon was there. It's amazing how they are freaking everywhere.

 

I was just hoping for at least data in Sturgis. Oh well. Well maybe in a year they will have service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I just got home tonight. From what I can tell, all three around Fergus plus the one to the east in Underwood is out. The site by Battle Lake was still up though, as was the one up I94 between Fergus and Rothsay. I'm curious as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called today as well and was told they were doing some kind of tower upgrade here and would be done tomorrow. There are at least 4 of them down though. At least there were last night.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seen people on the tower on Stanton today. Good things coming perhaps?

Well I don't have any signal from it now, so I hope so. I keep bouncing between the one north of town, roaming, and occasionally 1x800 from Underwood. Does anyone know who the NV backhaul vendor is for that tower? If it's Century link, why not just move the whole thing to the empty site in the CenturyLink parking lot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I don't have any signal from it now, so I hope so. I keep bouncing between the one north of town, roaming, and occasionally 1x800 from Underwood. Does anyone know who the NV backhaul vendor is for that tower? If it's Century link, why not just move the whole thing to the

empty site in the CenturyLink parking lot!

⬆⬆⬆ Edited by tyvarga
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That tower has been down since last Friday. There has to be a reason

 

Acutally I was able to use it both Wed and Thursday night. Both nights it came back on about 8pm. It just wasn't up during the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still 1x

Unless you are running Signal Check, your phone won't tell you you are on 800Mhz now. It will still just say 1x. You might notice improved signal inside buildings though. I don't think they have any LTE on that site yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the last few weeks i have been excited seeing crews putting new panels on towers in Grand Forks, and crews laying fiber.

But yesterday, I was talking to Sprint reps, and they said there is a holdup now with everything because of some issues with the FCC and the Canadian border.

I have seen some forum topics on Canadian IBEZ, and seen the map of it here, but I have'nt read anything that really explains it, or what it means to anyone in it.

Grand Forks is about 78 miles from the border.

So, my questions are:

1. Is this normal procedure that needs to run its course.

2. AT&T, Verizon have LTE here with seemingly no problem.

3. Will Spark ever be able to be here, or are some of the bands the problem.

 

Just hoping for some light at the end of the tunnel. thanks for any info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If my memory is correct ibez deals with 800mhz only. You should be able to get LTE on 1900 and 2600. I thought sprint already had PCS only panels they were using for the Canada ibez. Someone might of screwed up and had the wrong panels to install and didn't think before they shipped them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the last few weeks i have been excited seeing crews putting new panels on towers in Grand Forks, and crews laying fiber.

But yesterday, I was talking to Sprint reps, and they said there is a holdup now with everything because of some issues with the FCC and the Canadian border.

I have seen some forum topics on Canadian IBEZ, and seen the map of it here, but I have'nt read anything that really explains it, or what it means to anyone in it.

Grand Forks is about 78 miles from the border.

So, my questions are:

1. Is this normal procedure that needs to run its course.

3. Will Spark ever be able to be here, or are some of the bands the problem.

 

 

First: stop listening to the reps. 

Second I think this explains it very well. 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1704-frequently-asked-questions/?p=305867

 

 

GLOSSARY OF S4GRU TERMS         IBEZ = International Boundary Exclusion Zone

This refers to the roughly 70 mile area from the Canadian and Mexican borders (there's varying accounts of the actual area, but 70 miles is what I've seen the most of). The US and Canada / Mexico must reach an agreement for the use of the 800 MHz SMR spectrum that Sprint owns before Sprint can fully deploy that spectrum, otherwise there will be interference with the owners of the same spectrum on the other side of the border (Telus Mike on the Canadian side). The SMR (800 MHz) spectrum is what Sprint obtained from Nextel and is far better at building penetration and traveling distances than the 1.9 ghz PCS spectrum Sprint operates on now.          

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the last few weeks i have been excited seeing crews putting new panels on towers in Grand Forks, and crews laying fiber.

But yesterday, I was talking to Sprint reps, and they said there is a holdup now with everything because of some issues with the FCC and the Canadian border.

I have seen some forum topics on Canadian IBEZ, and seen the map of it here, but I have'nt read anything that really explains it, or what it means to anyone in it.

Grand Forks is about 78 miles from the border.

So, my questions are:

1. Is this normal procedure that needs to run its course.

2. AT&T, Verizon have LTE here with seemingly no problem.

3. Will Spark ever be able to be here, or are some of the bands the problem.

 

Just hoping for some light at the end of the tunnel. thanks for any info.

 

 

The IBEZ affects 800 LTE deployment only. It will not affect PCS/1900 LTE deployment, or Spark deployment if/when that happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First: stop listening to the reps. 

Second I think this explains it very well. 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1704-frequently-asked-questions/?p=305867

I have learned to not listen to them when they try fill me full of sunshine and lollipops, but when they have some potentially bad news, that caught my attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...