Jump to content

Sprint blames vendor execution for Network Vision delays


Recommended Posts

I know fiber created a huge delay for the site below...It was winter at the time though, but it wasn't too bad. CenturyLink should have been there the week in December when they were doing the road bore to the site.

 

Site history...MS03NP137

 

10/05/2012 - (eHRPD)

11/07/2012 - (cabinets delevered)

11/12/2012 - (RRU/panel assembly - 2 days)

11/26/2012 - (cabinets install - 2 days)

11/28/2012 - (RRU/panel install on tower - 300ft crane - 2 days)

12/21/2012 - (fiber road bore to site service road - 3 blocks - 3 days) (3 week delay)

12/26/2012 - (Inspection - Ericsson and American Tower trucks)

02/26/2013 - (run fiber from end of the service road to cabinets - Centurylink) (2 month delay)

03/23/2013 - (4G accepted, but not broadcasting yet)

03/28/2013 - (4G went live)

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biased title is biased. They easily could have used " Sprint cites vendor execution for Network Vision delays" instead of the sensationalist one they did. Pet peeve about "journalistic integrity", something sorely lacking in every "news" site in the US, or that focuses on US news. It may work on the uninformed that watch mainstream media, but I'd like to think the more technically apt among us aren't swayed by sensationalism.

 

That being said, it doesn't surprise me at all that the backhaul vendors are likely the cause for many of the delays. Inclement weather probably wasn't helping either, especially hurricanes and tornadoes.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know fiber created a huge delay for the site below...It was winter at the time though, but it wasn't too bad. CenturyLink should have been there the week in December when they were doing the road bore to the site.

 

Site history...MS03NP137

 

10/05/2012 - (eHRPD)

11/07/2012 - (cabinets delevered)

11/12/2012 - (RRU/panel assembly - 2 days)

11/26/2012 - (cabinets install - 2 days)

11/28/2012 - (RRU/panel install on tower - 300ft crane - 2 days)

12/21/2012 - (fiber road bore to site service road - 3 blocks - 3 days) (3 week delay)

12/26/2012 - (Inspection - Ericsson and American Tower trucks)

02/26/2013 - (run fiber from end of the service road to cabinets - Centurylink) (2 month delay)

03/23/2013 - (4G accepted, but not broadcasting yet)

03/28/2013 - (4G went live)

Where did you get the site info from ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ericsson has great network engineers and 3GPP engineers but their people to execute on the ground...not so much. I'd still take the RBS 6102 CDMA edition over the products by the other NV vendors, though the same Samsung stuff is no slouch either.

 

It is a shame that the CDMA Flexi wasn't ready by the time NV vendor selection was started so NSN couldn't bid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think with all these current delays and potential future ones, I can see Network Vision not largely completed until end of 2014.

 

They seem to be staying right around 4-5 months behind schedule at most. No further slippage since the beginning of the year. They just need to stay at the current level or pick up speed.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Mapped two n41 small cell sin Jersey City today. They're the first two to be mapped there in Jersey City as far as I can tell and interestingly they're consecutive gNBs, possibly indicating they were installed around the same time. gNB 1088335 appears to be an upgrade of an older small cell. It looks identical to the T-Mobile n41 small cell I mapped earlier this year in Old Westbury.   I also mapped gNB 1088334 in Newport. This small cell appears to be a new build as I couldn't find any evidence of an older small cell in that area. Unfortunately no pic of it since I didn't even notice that I mapped it until I got home and I can't find it in Streetview.
    • Someone told me a couple years ago, that there were problems getting certain modems to aggregate overlapping spectrum even if the overlapping parts were actually blanked. So I think there might be firmware issues that need to be resolved first, which T-Mobile might not consider worth the effort for 4MHz at this time.
    • Tbh not that surprising. Every ISP seems to want to have an MVNO to pitch to their customers to make them stickier and maybe make some money in the process. And unlike USCC the MVNO should be able to cover TDS's entire wireline area, with infrastructure costs that are borne by someone else. Entertaining, yes. Surprising, not really...particularly when competing against Comcast or Spectrum, or even eventually T-Mobile fixed + mobile. This also strengthens my bet that they'll rebrand all their fixed wireless stuff as TDS, as that runs on spectrum they're keeping for now.
    • No? RCS on Google messages works great for me, messages between anyone with RCS enabled go through with no problems. Don't remember the last time I had an issue. I only have issues with people on iPhones on different carriers from T-Mobile.
    • Has anyone experienced a ridiculous amount of difficulty with Google messages with RCS enabled?  It has been a train wreck for me for the past year so I now use WhatsApp.  That works very well for all of us.... Android and iOS.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...